Cited by 155Corporate Social Responsibility ReportingCorporate Social Responsibility and SustainabilityEnvironmental Sustainability in Business

Improving how sustainability reports drive change: A critical discourse analysis

Open access
Higgins, Colin, Coffey, Brian·2016·Journal of Cleaner Production

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.101

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The evolution of sustainability reporting as an endpoint for any framework for sustainability performance management is strongly influenced by a number of contingent factors, of which two stand out: guidance documents and quasi-standards such as the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) and International Integrated Reporting Council, and reporting, competitions, and rankings.

    “The evolution of sustainability reporting as an endpoint for any framework for sustainability performance management is strongly influenced by a number of contingent factors, of which two stand out: guidance documents and quasi-standards such as the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) and International Integrated Reporting Council, and reporting, competitions, and rankings [62,63].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 74 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Higgins, C., & Coffey, B.
Affiliations
  • Deakin University (AU)
  • RMIT University (AU)
Corresponding author
Higgins, Colin
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-11
Volume
136
Pages
18-29
ISSN
0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2277029416
Cited by
155
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4
FWCI
30.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cleaner Production (publishedVersion)
  • RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
Keywords
sustainability reporting, strategic communication, stakeholder engagement, dialogue, corporate sustainability strategy, business discourse

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review