Cited by 512Corporate Social Responsibility ReportingAuditing, Earnings Management, GovernanceEnvironmental Sustainability in Business

Corporate environmental disclosures about the effects of climate change

Stanny, Elizabeth, Ely, Kirsten·2008·Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management

Abstract

We examine factors associated with the US S&P 500 firms' decisions to disclose information about the current and projected effects of climate change to institutional investors. Through the Carbon Disclosure Project, 315 institutional investors representing 41 trillion USD in assets asked the largest public firms to respond to a questionnaire about climate change. We explore whether firms' disclosures directed specifically to institutional investors are related to factors that have been found to explain voluntary disclosures to investors in general. In particular, we consider factors related to the level of scrutiny, since extant literature predicts that the cost of not disclosing increases with level of scrutiny. We find that size, previous disclosures and foreign sales are related to whether firms disclose information about climate change requested by institutional investors through the Carbon Disclosure Project. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/csr.175

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Approaches used in climate analytics include NLP for identifying climate risks and investment opportunities in company disclosures, NLP for analyzing media climate coverage to dynamically hedge climate change risk, econometric approaches for arbitrage strategies using carbon risk factor, and ML for forecasting carbon price in emission exchanges.

    “Approaches used in this field include: natural language processing techniques for identifying climate risks and investment opportunities in disclosures made by companies [254,442,498,752] as well as for analyzing the evolution of climate coverage in the media to dynamically hedge climate change risk [221]; econometric approaches for developing arbitrage strategies that take advantage of the carbon”

    From Tackling climate change with machine learning (2023) · cites this paper as [752]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stanny, E., & Ely, K.
Affiliations
Sonoma State University (US)
Corresponding author
Stanny, Elizabeth
Venue
Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-10-23
Volume
15
Issue
6
Pages
338-348
ISSN
  • 1535-3958 (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-3966
OpenAlex
W2080820493
Cited by
512
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 22
FWCI
26.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
Keywords
corporate environmental disclosure, climate change disclosure, institutional investors, Carbon Disclosure Project, voluntary disclosure, disclosure costs, scrutiny, firm size, export sales, S&P 500 firms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review