The DOI matches its Crossref record; 110 of the 110 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Trends in the dynamic evolution of board gender diversity and corporate social responsibility
Abstract
A bibliometric and bibliographic review was carried out to determine the effect that gender diversity in a board of directors has on the level of business commitment to sustainable development and stakeholder engagement through the dissemination of social and environmental information. The review included 89 articles published in the 66 most prestigious journals on business, management, ethics and environmental sciences according to the journal citation reports on the ISI Web of Knowledge. There has been spectacular growth in this line of research since 2016, led by Spanish and American researchers. There is currently a paradigm shift in the theoretical frameworks that support these investigations in examining the organisational and institutional environments that favour the advantages associated with the presence of women in bodies responsible for business strategy. However, the latest papers are based on the use of the Critical mass theory and moderating factors in order to explaining the divergence of results.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Separation of Ownership and Control
Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983) · The Journal of Law and Economics · doi:10.1086/467037 · Cited by 19,058
Some Effects of Proportions on Group Life: Skewed Sex Ratios and Responses to Token Women
Kanter, R. M. (1977) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/226425 · Cited by 3,154
Bear, S., Rahman, N., & Post, C. (2010) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-010-0505-2 · Cited by 2,236
Board of Director Diversity and Firm Financial Performance
Erhardt, N. L., Werbel, J. D., & Shrader, C. B. (2003) · Corporate Governance: An International Review · doi:10.1111/1467-8683.00011 · Cited by 1,898
Gender diversity, board independence, environmental committee and greenhouse gas disclosure
Liao, L., Luo, L., & Tang, Q. (2015) · The British Accounting Review · doi:10.1016/j.bar.2014.01.002 · Cited by 1,802
Women Directors on Corporate Boards: A Review and Research Agenda
Terjesen, S., Sealy, R., & Singh, V. (2009) · Corporate Governance: An International Review · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00742.x · Cited by 1,680
Corporate Governance and Firm Value: The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility
Jo, H., & Harjoto, M. A. (2011) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-011-0869-y · Cited by 1,600
Business Ethics: Corporate Responses to Scandal
Fombrun, C., & Foss, C. (2004) · Corporate Reputation Review · doi:10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540226 · Cited by 1,597
Women Directors on Corporate Boards: From Tokenism to Critical Mass
Torchia, M., Calabrò, A., & Huse, M. (2011) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-011-0815-z · Cited by 1,492
Green Governance: Boards of Directors’ Composition and Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility
Post, C., Rahman, N., & Rubow, E. (2011) · Business & Society · doi:10.1177/0007650310394642 · Cited by 1,241
Metadata
- Authors
- Amorelli, M., & García‐Sánchez, I.
- Venue
- Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-11-04
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 537-554
- ISSN
- 1535-3958 (ISSN-L)
- 1535-3966
- OpenAlex
- W3096597240
- Cited by
- 264
- References
- 110
- FWCI
- 39.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Trends in the dynamic evolution of board gender diversity and corporate social responsibility. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/csr.2079
- The paper
- Amorelli, M., & García‐Sánchez, I. (2021). Trends in the dynamic evolution of board gender diversity and corporate social responsibility. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2079
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
