The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Digital technology innovation and corporate environmental, social, and governance performance: Evidence from a sample of listed firms in China
Abstract
Corporate environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance is gaining significance in global sustainable development. Corporations can improve ESG performance through digital technology innovation (DTI). However, few studies systematically examined the relationship between DTI and ESG performance. This study uses digital technology patent application data as a proxy for DTI to provide empirical evidence. Analysis of Chinese A‐share firms from 2009 to 2021 shows that DTI significantly improves ESG performance, particularly for small‐sized and non‐state‐owned firms. Mediation analysis indicates that DTI promotes ESG performance by increasing internal control quality and human capital. Institutional environment and government digital attention optimization enhances DTI's promotion effect on ESG performance. Firms with advanced digital transformation can better improve ESG performance through DTI. The findings expand the theoretical understanding of DTI's role in corporate sustainability and provide practical insights into how managers can leverage DTI opportunities to strengthen ESG performance.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Implementing sustainable HR strategies, including continuous learning, upskilling, and leadership development programs, ensures that employees remain relevant amid technological disruptions and industry changes (Feng & Nie, 2024).”
From Evaluation of the Sustainability of Organizational Welfare and Human Resources to Improving Long-Term Performance (2025) · cites this paper as Feng & Nie, 2024
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 75
- 10.1002/bse.2937 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121016 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.gfj.2022.100711 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10551-021-04850-z · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1467-937X.2007.00426.x · DOI
- 10.1002/csr.2343 · DOI
- 10.1287/mnsc.2017.2960 · DOI
- 10.1080/09638180.2020.1776626 · DOI
- 10.3389/fenvs.2022.955055 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jik.2022.100173 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jeem.2018.01.010 · DOI
- 10.2308/TAR-2019-0506 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.respol.2021.104289 · DOI
- 10.1111/0022-1082.00121 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113397 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.econmod.2022.106101 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.eap.2022.12.020 · DOI
- 10.3390/land12030701 · DOI
- 10.1111/beer.12671 · DOI
- 10.1080/09640568.2023.2220898 · DOI
- 10.1177/10704965231225781 · DOI
- 10.1093/rfs/hhv050 · DOI
- 10.1002/bse.3288 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.08.045 · DOI
- 10.1080/0960085X.2020.1747365 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102550 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.infoandorg.2018.02.004 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/09537325.2024.2309296 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102810 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101904 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.econmod.2022.106102 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104730 · DOI
- 10.2307/2171884 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113648 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.iref.2023.01.024 · DOI
- 10.1002/csr.2520 · DOI
- 10.1108/EJIM-09-2022-0496 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102458 · DOI
- 10.1080/13504851.2022.2098238 · DOI
- 10.1002/bse.3494 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.frl.2022.103426 · DOI
- 10.25300/MISQ/2017/41:1.03 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.eap.2024.02.020 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jik.2023.100326 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.01.038 · DOI
- 10.3390/joitmc5030056 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105220 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.pacfin.2023.102019 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106073 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bushor.2022.07.003 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.econmod.2022.106148 · DOI
- 10.1002/csr.2761 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.frl.2024.104983 · DOI
- 10.1108/EJIM-08-2021-0431 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097‐0266(199708)18:7<509::AID‐SMJ882>3.0.CO;2‐Z · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/csr.2335 · DOI
- 10.5465/ambpp.2014.14174abstract · DOI
- 10.1080/09537325.2021.1991575 · DOI
- 10.3390/su142416597 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.frl.2023.104101 · DOI
- 10.3390/app13052862 · DOI
- 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.897080 · DOI
- 10.1111/beer.12573 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102545 · DOI
- 10.1108/EJIM-08-2020-0324 · DOI
- 10.1002/csr.2506 · DOI
- 10.1108/K-03-2023-0521 · DOI
- 10.1108/SAMPJ-08-2023-0553 · DOI
- 10.1002/csr.2546 · DOI
- 10.1108/BPMJ-11-2022-0551 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106756 · DOI
- 10.1002/csr.2503 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.frl.2023.104223 · DOI
- 10.1002/bse.3211 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
R.A, R. A., Hardy, H., Asrul, A., Maslim, M., & Megawaty, M. (2025) · PARADOKS Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi · doi:10.57178/paradoks.v8i2.1157 · Cited by 3
“Implementing sustainable HR strategies, including continuous learning, upskilling, and leadership development programs, ensures that employees remain relevant amid technological disruptions and industry changes (Feng & Nie, 2024).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Feng, Y., & Nie, C.
- Affiliations
- Jiangxi Normal University (CN)
- Nanchang University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Nie, Changfei
- Venue
- Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2024-03-18
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 3836-3854
- ISSN
- 1535-3958 (ISSN-L)
- 1535-3966
- OpenAlex
- W4392965617
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 6
- FWCI
- 16.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digital Economy and Transformation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Sustainability and Innovation in Business
- Keywords
- digital technology innovation, corporate ESG performance, ESG performance, digital transformation, internal control quality, human capital, institutional environment, firm size, state ownership, Chinese listed companies, corporate sustainability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Digital technology innovation and corporate environmental, social, and governance performance: Evidence from a sample of listed firms in China. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/csr.2781
- The paper
- Feng, Y., & Nie, C. (2024). Digital technology innovation and corporate environmental, social, and governance performance: Evidence from a sample of listed firms in China. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2781