Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 200

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Improving the Performance of Formamidinium and Cesium Lead Triiodide Perovskite Solar Cells using Lead Thiocyanate Additives

Yu, Yue, Wang, Changlei, Grice, Corey R., Shrestha, Niraj, Chen, Jing, Zhao, Dewei, Liao, Weiqiang, Cimaroli, Alexander J., Roland, Paul J., Ellingson, Randy J., Yan, Yanfa·2016·ChemSusChem

Abstract

Formamidinium lead triiodide (FAPbI 3) is considered as an alternative to methylammonium lead triiodide (MAPbI 3) because of its lower band gap and better thermal stability. However, owing to the large size of FA cations, it is difficult to synthesize high‐quality FAPbI 3 thin films without the formation of an undesirable yellow phase. Smaller sized cations, such as MA and Cs, have been successfully used to suppress the formation of the yellow phase. Whereas FA and MA lead triiodide perovskite solar cells (PVSCs) have achieved power conversion efficiencies (PCEs) higher than 20 %, the PCEs of formamidinium and cesium lead triiodide (FA 1−xCsxPbI 3) PVSCs have been only approximately 16.5 %. Herein, we report our examination of the main factors limiting the PCEs of (FA 1−xCsxPbI 3) PVSCs. We find that one of the main limiting factors could be the small grain sizes (≈120 nm), which leads to relatively short carrier lifetimes. We further find that adding a small amount of lead thiocyanate [Pb(SCN)2] to the precursors can enlarge the grain size of (FA 1−xCsxPbI 3) perovskite thin films and significantly increase carrier lifetimes. As a result, we are able to fabricate (FA 1−xCsxPbI 3) PVSCs with significantly improved open‐circuit voltages and fill factors and, therefore, enhanced PCEs. With an optimal 0.5 mol % Pb(SCN)2 additive, the average PCE is increased from 16.18±0.50 (13.45±0.78) % to 18.16±0.54 (16.86±0.63) % for planar FA 0.8 Cs 0.2 PbI 3 PVSCs if measured under reverse (forward) voltage scans. The champion cell registers a PCE of 19.57 (18.12) % if measured under a reverse (forward) voltage scan, which is comparable to that of the best‐performing MA‐containing planar FA‐based lead halide PVSCs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cssc.201601027

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 200

Metadata

Authors
Yu, Y., Wang, C., Grice, C. R., Shrestha, N., Chen, J., Zhao, D., Liao, W., Cimaroli, A. J., Roland, P. J., Ellingson, R. J., & Yan, Y.
Venue
ChemSusChem
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-10-26
Volume
9
Issue
23
Pages
3288-3297
ISSN
  • 1864-5631 (ISSN-L)
  • 1864-564X
OpenAlex
W2545092135
Cited by
200
References
2
FWCI
13.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improving the Performance of Formamidinium and Cesium Lead Triiodide Perovskite Solar Cells using Lead Thiocyanate Additives. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cssc.201601027
The paper
Yu, Y., Wang, C., Grice, C. R., Shrestha, N., Chen, J., Zhao, D., Liao, W., Cimaroli, A. J., Roland, P. J., Ellingson, R. J., & Yan, Y. (2016). Improving the Performance of Formamidinium and Cesium Lead Triiodide Perovskite Solar Cells using Lead Thiocyanate Additives. ChemSusChem. https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201601027

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.