The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Improving the Performance of Formamidinium and Cesium Lead Triiodide Perovskite Solar Cells using Lead Thiocyanate Additives
Abstract
Formamidinium lead triiodide (FAPbI 3) is considered as an alternative to methylammonium lead triiodide (MAPbI 3) because of its lower band gap and better thermal stability. However, owing to the large size of FA cations, it is difficult to synthesize high‐quality FAPbI 3 thin films without the formation of an undesirable yellow phase. Smaller sized cations, such as MA and Cs, have been successfully used to suppress the formation of the yellow phase. Whereas FA and MA lead triiodide perovskite solar cells (PVSCs) have achieved power conversion efficiencies (PCEs) higher than 20 %, the PCEs of formamidinium and cesium lead triiodide (FA 1−xCsxPbI 3) PVSCs have been only approximately 16.5 %. Herein, we report our examination of the main factors limiting the PCEs of (FA 1−xCsxPbI 3) PVSCs. We find that one of the main limiting factors could be the small grain sizes (≈120 nm), which leads to relatively short carrier lifetimes. We further find that adding a small amount of lead thiocyanate [Pb(SCN)2] to the precursors can enlarge the grain size of (FA 1−xCsxPbI 3) perovskite thin films and significantly increase carrier lifetimes. As a result, we are able to fabricate (FA 1−xCsxPbI 3) PVSCs with significantly improved open‐circuit voltages and fill factors and, therefore, enhanced PCEs. With an optimal 0.5 mol % Pb(SCN)2 additive, the average PCE is increased from 16.18±0.50 (13.45±0.78) % to 18.16±0.54 (16.86±0.63) % for planar FA 0.8 Cs 0.2 PbI 3 PVSCs if measured under reverse (forward) voltage scans. The champion cell registers a PCE of 19.57 (18.12) % if measured under a reverse (forward) voltage scan, which is comparable to that of the best‐performing MA‐containing planar FA‐based lead halide PVSCs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kim, H.-S., Lee, C.-R., Im, J.-H., Lee, K.-B., Moehl, T., Marchioro, A., Moon, S.-J., Humphry-Baker, R., Yum, J.-H., Moser, J. E., et al. (2012) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep00591 · Cited by 8,092
Solvent engineering for high-performance inorganic–organic hybrid perovskite solar cells
Jeon, N. J., Noh, J. H., Kim, Y. C., Yang, W. S., Ryu, S., & Seok, S. I. (2014) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat4014 · Cited by 6,723
Cited by
Synthetic Approaches for Halide Perovskite Thin Films
Dunlap-Shohl, W. A., Zhou, Y., Padture, N. P., & Mitzi, D. B. (2019) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00318 · Cited by 631
Progress on Perovskite Materials and Solar Cells with Mixed Cations and Halide Anions
Ono, L. K., Juarez-Perez, E. J., & Qi, Y. (2017) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/acsami.7b06001 · Cited by 593
Recent progress in flexible–wearable solar cells for self-powered electronic devices
Hashemi, S. A., Ramakrishna, S., & Aberle, A. G. (2020) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c9ee03046h · Cited by 527
Recent advances in perovskite solar cells: efficiency, stability and lead-free perovskite
Yang, S., Fu, W., Zhang, Z., Chen, H., & Li, C.-Z. (2017) · Journal of Materials Chemistry A · doi:10.1039/c7ta00366h · Cited by 486
A review of aspects of additive engineering in perovskite solar cells
Mahapatra, A., Prochowicz, D., Tavakoli, M. M., Trivedi, S., Kumar, P., & Yadav, P. (2020) · Journal of Materials Chemistry A · doi:10.1039/c9ta07657c · Cited by 369
Bi, D., Li, X., Milić, J. V., Kubicki, D. J., Pellet, N., Luo, J., LaGrange, T., Mettraux, P., Emsley, L., Zakeeruddin, S. M., et al. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-06709-w · Cited by 339
Metadata
- Authors
- Yu, Y., Wang, C., Grice, C. R., Shrestha, N., Chen, J., Zhao, D., Liao, W., Cimaroli, A. J., Roland, P. J., Ellingson, R. J., & Yan, Y.
- Venue
- ChemSusChem
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-10-26
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 3288-3297
- ISSN
- 1864-5631 (ISSN-L)
- 1864-564X
- OpenAlex
- W2545092135
- Cited by
- 200
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 13.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.