Cited by 23Bone Metabolism and DiseasesBone health and osteoporosis researchRheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies

A novel modified RANKL variant can prevent osteoporosis by acting as a vaccine and an inhibitor

Open access
Ko, Young Jong, Sohn, Hong Moon, Jang, Yuria, Park, Mineon, Kim, Bora, Kim, Beomchang, Park, Jae‐Il, Hyun, Hoon +3 more·2021·Clinical and Translational Medicine

Abstract

Background: The discovery of receptor activator of nuclear factor‐ĸB ligand (RANKL) as the final effector in the pathogenesis of osteoporosis has led to a better understanding of bone remodeling. When RANKL binds to its receptor (RANK), osteoclastic differentiation and activation are initiated. Herein, we propose a strategy using a novel RANKL variant as a competitive inhibitor for RANKL. The RANKL variant activates LGR4 signaling, which competitively regulates RANK and acts as an immunogen that induces anti‐RANKL antibody production. Methods: We modified the RANK‐binding site on RANKL using minimal amino acid changes in the RANKL complex and its counterpart receptor RANK and tried to evaluate the inhibitory effects on osteoclastogenesis. Results: The novel RANKL variant did not bind RANK in osteoclast progenitor cells, but activated LGR4 through the GSK3‐β signaling pathway, thereby suppressing activated T cell cytoplasmic nuclear factor calcineurin‐dependent 1 (NFATc1) expression and activity during osteoclastogenesis. Our RANKL variant generated high levels of RANKL‐specific antibodies, blocked osteoclastogenesis, and inhibited osteoporosis in ovariectomized mouse models. Generated anti‐RANKL antibodies showed a high inhibitory effect on osteoclastogenesis in vivo and in vitro. Conclusions: We observed that the novel RANKL indeed blocks RANKL via LGR4 signaling and generates anti‐RANKL antibodies, demonstrating an innovative strategy in the development of general immunotherapy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ctm2.368

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A variant of RANKL with changes in the RANK binding site still activates LGR4 signaling and inhibits osteoclastogenesis; it acts as an immunogen triggering anti-RANKL antibodies and might reduce risks linked to abrupt suspension of denosumab.

    “This variant still activates LGR4 signaling and inhibits osteoclastogenesis. Moreover, it has been observed that this variant acts as an immunogen triggering the production of anti‐RANKL antibodies, and its use might reduce the risks linked to the abrupt suspension of denosumab use.173,70”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 44 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [36]Wu T, Li F, Sha X, et al. A novel recombinant RANKL vaccine prepared by incorporation of an unnatural amino acid into RANKL and its preventive effect in a murine model of collagen‐induced arthritis. Int Immunopharmacol. 2018; 64: 326‐ 332. 30243068
  2. [43]Nelson CA, Warren JT, Wang MW‐H, Teitelbaum SL, Fremont DH. RANKL employs distinct binding modes to engage RANK and the osteoprotegerin decoy receptor. Structure. 2012; 20: 1971‐ 1982. 23039992 PMC3607351

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ko, Y. J., Sohn, H. M., Jang, Y., Park, M., Kim, B., Kim, B., Park, J., Hyun, H., Jeong, B., Hong, C., & Lim, W.
Affiliations
  • Chosun University Hospital (KR)
  • Chonnam National University (KR)
  • Chosun University (KR)
Corresponding author
Lim, Wonbong
Venue
Clinical and Translational Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-03
Volume
11
Issue
3
Pages
e368-e368
ISSN
2001-1326 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3139176863
Cited by
23
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3
FWCI
1.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical and Translational Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF‐2018R1D1A1B07047024, NRF‐2017R1D1A1A02018589, NRF‐2020R1F1A1056573)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bone Metabolism and Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
Keywords
osteoporosis, GSK3β, NFATc1, osteoclastogenesis, anti-RANKL antibody, immunotherapy, competitive inhibitors, ovariectomy, bone remodeling
MeSH terms
Animals, Bone Resorption, Cell Differentiation, Osteoclasts, Osteogenesis, Osteoporosis, Vaccines, Mice, RANK Ligand

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review