The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multiplex bead array assays for detection of soluble cytokines: Comparisons of sensitivity and quantitative values among kits from multiple manufacturers
Open accessAbstract
Background: Multiplex bead array assays permit simultaneous cytometric quantitation of multiple cytokines in solution by capturing these to spectrally distinct beads. Because several manufacturers offer reagents to quantitate the same cytokines on a single instrument, a comparison should be made to determine whether these kits yield similar data and whether these data are comparable to enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Methods: This study compared cytokine detection kits by using Luminex 100. Twenty‐six serum samples from seven subjects were analyzed for interferon‐γ, interleukins 1β, 6, and 8, and tumor necrosis factor‐α by using multiplex kits from LINCO Research, Bio‐Rad Laboratories, R&D Systems, and BioSource International. Each assay was performed according to the manufacturers' specifications. Standard curves were generated by using reference concentrations supplied by each manufacturer. ELISAs for interleukin‐8 were performed by using kits from R&D and BioSource. Results: Cytokine levels followed similar patterns, although absolute concentrations differed among kits. ELISA and Luminex values for interleukin‐8 were similar in kits from the same manufacturer. Conclusions: Because relative cytokine measurements are often valuable when performed serially, it may be possible to make interlaboratory comparisons by using different kits. When comparison of absolute values is crucial, kits from the same supplier should be used. Within‐vendor, bead array, and ELISA values appear comparable. Published 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
de Jager, W., te Velthuis, H., Prakken, B. J., Kuis, W., & Rijkers, G. T. (2003) · Clinical and Vaccine Immunology · doi:10.1128/cdli.10.1.133-139.2003 · Cited by 568
Dunbar, S. A., Vander Zee, C. A., Oliver, K. G., Karem, K. L., & Jacobson, J. W. (2003) · Journal of Microbiological Methods · doi:10.1016/s0167-7012(03)00028-9 · Cited by 284
Suffredini, A. F., Reda, D., Banks, S. M., Tropea, M., Agosti, J. M., & Miller, R. (1995) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.155.10.5038 · Cited by 205
Self-citationSimultaneous quantification of proinflammatory cytokines in human plasma using the LabMAP™ assay
Prabhakar, U., Eirikis, E., & Davis, H. M. (2002) · Journal of Immunological Methods · doi:10.1016/s0022-1759(01)00543-9 · Cited by 184
Suffredini, A. F., Hochstein, H. D., & McMahon, F. G. (1999) · The Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/314717 · Cited by 154
Self-citationCytokines as Mediators for or Effectors against Rotavirus Disease in Children
Jiang, B., Snipes-Magaldi, L. J., Dennehy, P. H., KEYSERLING, H. L., Holman, R., Bresee, J., Gentsch, J., & Glass, R. I. (2003) · Clinical and Vaccine Immunology · doi:10.1128/cdli.10.6.995-1001.2003 · Cited by 151
Pickering, J. W., Martins, T. B., Schroder, M. C., & Hill, H. R. (2002) · Clinical and Vaccine Immunology · doi:10.1128/cdli.9.4.872-876.2002 · Cited by 131
A novel monoclonal antibody screening method using the Luminex-100™ microsphere system
Seideman, J. H., & Peritt, D. (2002) · Journal of Immunological Methods · doi:10.1016/s0022-1759(02)00168-0 · Cited by 71
Keyes, K. A., Mann, L. L., Cox, K. L., Treadway, P., Iversen, P. W., Chen, Y.-F., & Teicher, B. A. (2003) · Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00280-003-0572-5 · Cited by 63
Preas, H. L., Reda, D., Tropea, M., Vandivier, R. W., Banks, S., Agosti, J. M., & Suffredini, A. F. (1996) · PubMed · Cited by 56
Self-citation
Cited by
Diagnosing COVID-19: The Disease and Tools for Detection
Udugama, B., Kadhiresan, P., Kozlowski, H. N., Malekjahani, A., Osborne, M., Li, V. Y. C., Chen, H., Mubareka, S., Gubbay, J. B., & Chan, W. C. W. (2020) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.0c02624 · Cited by 1,754
Elevated immune response in the brain of autistic patients
Li, X., Chauhan, A., Sheikh, A. M., Patil, S., Chauhan, V., Li, X.-M., Ji, L., Brown, T., & Malik, M. (2009) · Journal of Neuroimmunology · doi:10.1016/j.jneuroim.2008.12.002 · Cited by 786
Cytokine Levels in Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19 and Other Conditions
Kox, M., Waalders, N. J. B., Kooistra, E. J., Gerretsen, J., & Pickkers, P. (2020) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2020.17052 · Cited by 333
A live-cell assay to detect antigen-specific CD4+ T cells with diverse cytokine profiles
Chattopadhyay, P. K., Yu, J., & Roederer, M. (2005) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm1293 · Cited by 320
Bioanalytical Chemistry of Cytokines–a Review
Stenken, J. A., & Poschenrieder, A. J. (2015) · Analytica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.aca.2014.10.009 · Cited by 302
Metadata
- Authors
- Khan, S. S., Smith, M. S., Reda, D., Suffredini, A. F., & McCoy, J. P.
- Venue
- Cytometry Part B: Clinical Cytometry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-08-03
- Volume
- 61B
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 35-39
- ISSN
- 1552-4949 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-4957
- OpenAlex
- W1968827381
- Cited by
- 354
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 8.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multiplex bead array assays for detection of soluble cytokines: Comparisons of sensitivity and quantitative values among kits from multiple manufacturers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cyto.b.20021
- The paper
- Khan, S. S., Smith, M. S., Reda, D., Suffredini, A. F., & McCoy, J. P. (2004). Multiplex bead array assays for detection of soluble cytokines: Comparisons of sensitivity and quantitative values among kits from multiple manufacturers. Cytometry Part B: Clinical Cytometry. https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.b.20021
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
