Cited by 89Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersPersonality Disorders and PsychopathologyAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

DBT-enhanced habit reversal treatment for trichotillomania: 3- and 6-month follow-up results

Keuthen, Nancy J., Rothbaum, Barbara O., Falkenstein, Martha J., Meunier, Suzanne, Timpano, Kiara R., Jenike, Michael A., Welch, Stacy Shaw·2011·Depression and Anxiety

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Maintenance of gains with cognitive-behavioral treatment for trichotillomania (TTM) has historically been problematic. METHODS: We conducted follow-up assessments 3 and 6 months after completion of a 3-month maintenance phase on 10 individuals with DSM-IV-TR TTM who participated in an open trial of a dialectical behavior therapy (DBT)-enhanced habit reversal treatment (HRT). RESULTS: Significant improvement from baseline was reported at 3-and 6-month follow-up on all measures of hair pulling severity and emotion regulation, although some worsening was reported on some measures from earlier study time points. At 6-month follow-up, five and four participants were full and partial responders, respectively. Significant correlations were reported at both follow-up time points between changes in hair pulling severity and emotion regulation capacity. CONCLUSIONS: DBT-enhanced HRT offers promise for improved long-term treatment results in TTM. Changes in TTM severity from baseline to 3-and 6-month follow-up is correlated with changes in emotion regulation capacity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/da.20778

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • At both follow-up time points, significant correlations were reported between changes in hair pulling severity and emotion regulation capacity.

    “At both follow-up time points, significant correlations were reported between changes in hair pulling severity and ER capacity.”
  • At 3- and 6-month follow-up after the 3-month maintenance period, significant improvement from baseline still occurred for all hair pulling severity and emotion regulation measures.

    “At 3- and 6-month follow-up after the 3-month maintenance period, significant improvement from baseline still occurred for all hair pulling severity and ER measures (Keuthen et al., 2011).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Keuthen, N. J., Rothbaum, B. O., Falkenstein, M. J., Meunier, S., Timpano, K. R., Jenike, M. A., & Welch, S. S.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Emory University (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Keuthen, Nancy J.
Venue
Depression and Anxiety
Published
2010-12-15
Volume
28
Issue
4
Pages
310-313
ISSN
1091-4269 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2145361587
Cited by
89
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Depression and Anxiety (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
trichotillomania, dialectical behavior therapy, maintenance of treatment gains, emotion regulation, long-term follow-up, treatment response
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Combined Modality Therapy, Emotions, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Habits, Humans, Pilot Projects, Trichotillomania, Comorbidity, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Meditation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review