Cited by 68Endometriosis Research and TreatmentGynecological conditions and treatmentsEctopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management

Fine‐needle aspiration cytology of scar endometriosis: Study of seven cases and literature review

Medeiros, Francisco das Chagas, Cavalcante, Diane Isabelle Magno, Medeiros, Maria Angelina da Silva, Eleutério, José·2011·Diagnostic Cytopathology

Abstract

Endometriosis is defined as the presence of endometrial‐like glands and stroma outside the uterine endometrial lining. Endometrial tissue has also been identified in numerous surgical or procedure scars, including cesarean section and laparoscopic trocar tract. A prospective study was conducted at Maternidade‐Escola Assis Chateaubriand, Faculty of Medicine, Federal University of Ceara, Brazil in seven patients with abdominal wall mass pathologically proven as scar endometriosis from January 2004 to December 2008. All cases were submitted to fine‐needle aspiration cytology (FNAC). Age ranged from 21 to 42 years old (mean: 30) with parity ranging from 0 to 3 (mean: 1.4). The preceding history of pelvic procedures was miomectomy (1 of 7), cesarean section (3 of 7), and diagnostic laparoscopy (3 of 7). The complaints occurred about 18 months after the surgical proceeding. The FNAC findings were endometrial‐like epithelial cells (6 of 7) and stromal cells (6 of 7); decidualization occurred in 2 of 7 cases. Hemosiderin‐laden macrophages were present in all cases. FNAC is a fast and accurate method to make the diagnosis before the surgery, avoiding errors in the approach of the abdominal wall endometriosis' scars. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2011;39:18–21. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/dc.21319

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Medeiros, F. D. C., Cavalcante, D. I. M., Medeiros, M. A. D. S., & Eleutério, J.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Federal do Ceará (BR)
  • Universidade de Fortaleza (BR)
Corresponding author
Eleutério, José
Venue
Diagnostic Cytopathology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-12-15
Volume
39
Issue
1
Pages
18-21
ISSN
  • 1097-0339 (ISSN-L)
  • 8755-1039
OpenAlex
W2008964324
Cited by
68
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
FWCI
5.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diagnostic Cytopathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management
Keywords
scar endometriosis, abdominal wall endometriosis, fine needle aspiration cytology, cesarean section scar, hemosiderin-laden macrophages, decidualization, preoperative diagnosis
MeSH terms
Adult, Cicatrix, Endometriosis, Female, Humans, Prospective Studies, Abdominal Wall, Biopsy, Fine-Needle, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review