Cited by 172Endometriosis Research and TreatmentGynecological conditions and treatmentsDiagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis

Presentation of endometriosis to general surgeons: A 10-year experience

Singh, K K, Lessells, A M, Adam, D J, Jordan, C, Miles, W F A, MacIntyre, I M C, Greig, J D·1995·Journal of British Surgery

Abstract

The presentation and management of 24 patients with endometriosis (median age 34 (range 21–68) years) presenting to general surgeons over a period of 10 years (1985–1994) was reviewed. Patients presented with an abdominal wall swelling related to a previous Pfannenstiel incision (seven patients), umbilical swelling (four), inguinal canal swelling (two), incidentally following appendicectomy (five), terminal ileal obstruction (two), rectal bleeding (two) and urinary symptoms (two). Endometriosis was not suspected in most patients but was confirmed by surgical excision or resection with minimal morbidity. No recurrence occurred during a median follow-up of 53 (range 9–113) months. Endometriosis is a disease rarely seen by general surgeons and is often diagnosed incidentally or on histological examination. Cyclical symptoms associated with menstruation are present in 50 per cent of patients and should suggest the diagnosis in those presenting with scar-related and/or subcutaneous swellings. Simple excision or resection of the presenting lesion provides adequate treatment but, since pelvic endometriosis may be present, referral to a gynaecologist is recommended in every case.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/bjs.1800821017

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The frequency of AWE has been estimated to be 0.04%-5.5%.

    “The frequency of AWE has been estimated to be 0.04%‐5.5%.”

    From Extra-pelvic endometriosis: a review. (2020) · cites this paper as [13]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 18 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Singh, K. K., Lessells, A. M., Adam, D. J., Jordan, C., Miles, W. F. A., MacIntyre, I. M. C., & Greig, J. D.
Affiliations
Western General Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Greig, J D
Venue
Journal of British Surgery
Published
1995-10-01
Volume
82
Issue
10
Pages
1349-1351
ISSN
  • 0007-1323 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2168
OpenAlex
W2113171143
Cited by
172
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 8
FWCI
1.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • British journal of surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis
Keywords
endometriosis, incidental diagnosis, Pfannenstiel incision, appendectomy, rectal bleeding, surgical excision, surgical resection, recurrence, general surgery
MeSH terms
Abdominal Muscles, Adult, Aged, Appendix, Urinary Bladder Diseases, Cecal Diseases, Colonic Diseases, Endometriosis, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Inguinal Canal, Middle Aged, Muscular Diseases, Umbilicus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review