The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prevalence and epidemiologic characteristics of FASD from various research methods with an emphasis on recent in‐school studies
Abstract
Researching the epidemiology and estimating the prevalence of fetal alcohol syndrome (FAS) and other fetal alcohol spectrum disorders (FASD) for mainstream populations anywhere in the world has presented a challenge to researchers. Three major approaches have been used in the past: surveillance and record review systems, clinic‐based studies, and active case ascertainment methods. The literature on each of these methods is reviewed citing the strengths, weaknesses, prevalence results, and other practical considerations for each method. Previous conclusions about the prevalence of FAS and total FASD in the United States (US) population are summarized. Active approaches which provide clinical outreach, recruitment, and diagnostic services in specific populations have been demonstrated to produce the highest prevalence estimates. We then describe and review studies utilizing in‐school screening and diagnosis, a special type of active case ascertainment. Selected results from a number of in‐school studies in South Africa, Italy, and the US are highlighted. The particular focus of the review is on the nature of the data produced from in‐school methods and the specific prevalence rates of FAS and total FASD which have emanated from them. We conclude that FAS and other FASD are more prevalent in school populations, and therefore the general population, than previously estimated. We believe that the prevalence of FAS in typical, mixed‐racial, and mixed‐socioeconomic populations of the US is at least 2 to 7 per 1,000. Regarding all levels of FASD, we estimate that the current prevalence of FASD in populations of younger school children may be as high as 2–5% in the US and some Western European countries. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. Dev Disabil Res Rev 2009; 15:176–192.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Abel, E. L. (1998) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-5217-5 · Cited by 198
Cited by
Sex and gender differences in substance use disorders
McHugh, R. K., Votaw, V. R., Sugarman, D. E., & Greenfield, S. F. (2018) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2017.10.012 · Cited by 1,076
Popova, S., Lange, S., Probst, C., Gmel, G., & Rehm, J. (2017) · The Lancet Global Health · doi:10.1016/s2214-109x(17)30021-9 · Cited by 937
Comorbidity of fetal alcohol spectrum disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Popova, S., Lange, S., Shield, K., Mihic, A., Chudley, A. E., Mukherjee, R. A. S., Bekmuradov, D., & Rehm, J. (2016) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(15)01345-8 · Cited by 541
Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders
Williams, J. F., Smith, V. C., & the COMMITTEE ON SUBSTANCE ABUSE (2015) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2015-3113 · Cited by 332
May, P. A., Blankenship, J., Marais, A., Gossage, J. P., Kalberg, W. O., Barnard, R., De Vries, M., Robinson, L. K., Adnams, C. M., Buckley, D., et al. (2013) · Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research · doi:10.1111/acer.12033 · Cited by 234
Self-citationDonald, K. A., Eastman, E., Howells, F. M., Adnams, C., Riley, E. P., Woods, R. P., Narr, K. L., & Stein, D. J. (2015) · Acta Neuropsychiatrica · doi:10.1017/neu.2015.12 · Cited by 185
O’Keeffe, L. M., Greene, R. A., & Kearney, P. M. (2014) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/2046-4053-3-1 · Cited by 192
May, P. A., de Vries, M. M., Marais, A.-S., Kalberg, W. O., Adnams, C. M., Hasken, J. M., Tabachnick, B., Robinson, L. K., Manning, M. A., Jones, K. L., et al. (2016) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.12.023 · Cited by 76
Self-citationAlcohol Use, Partner Violence, and Depression
Rotheram-Borus, M. J., Tomlinson, M., Roux, I. L., & Stein, J. A. (2015) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2015.05.004 · Cited by 71
May, P. A., Marais, A.-S., de Vries, M. M., Kalberg, W. O., Buckley, D., Hasken, J. M., Adnams, C. M., Barnard, R., Joubert, B., Cloete, M., et al. (2016) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.09.025 · Cited by 50
Self-citationUrban, M. F., Olivier, L., Viljoen, D., Lombard, C., Louw, J. G., Drotsky, L., Temmerman, M., & Chersich, M. F. (2015) · Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research · doi:10.1111/acer.12726 · Cited by 49
Technology-Based Alcohol Interventions in Primary Care: Systematic Review
Ramsey, A. T., Satterfield, J. M., Gerke, D. R., & Proctor, E. K. (2019) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/10859 · Cited by 40
Tang, S., Xu, S., Waddell, J., Zhu, W., Gullapalli, R. P., & Mooney, S. M. (2019) · Developmental Neuroscience · doi:10.1159/000499183 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- May, P. A., Gossage, J. P., Kalberg, W. O., Robinson, L. K., Buckley, D., Manning, M., & Hoyme, H. E.
- Venue
- Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-01
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 176-192
- ISSN
- 1940-5510 (ISSN-L)
- 1940-5529
- OpenAlex
- W2152948116
- Cited by
- 906
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 44.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
