The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Consumer awareness of name removal procedures: Implications for direct marketing
Abstract
Providing consumers an opportunity to remove their names from mailing lists is one method for addressing rising consumer concerns about privacy. Name removal is also central to the success of the industry's self-regulatory programs. However, 52 percent of the public, including 45 percent of those who shop by mail, are not aware of name removal procedures. This study investigates how consumers who are aware of name removal differ from those who are not, based on an analysis of the raw data from the 1991 Harris-Equifax Consumer Privacy Survey (17). Consumers who are unaware of name removal are more likely to be young and to be African-American, and less likely to be well-educated, to have shopped by mail, and are less likely to be concerned about privacy than consumers who are aware.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Culnan, M. J. (1993) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249775 · Cited by 618
Self-citationPrivacy: Recognition of a Consumer Right
Goodwin, C. (1991) · Journal of Public Policy & Marketing · doi:10.1177/074391569101000111 · Cited by 393
Cited by
Internet Users' Information Privacy Concerns (IUIPC): The Construct, the Scale, and a Causal Model
Malhotra, N. K., Kim, S. S., & Agarwal, J. (2004) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1040.0032 · Cited by 3,173
Building consumer trust online
Hoffman, D. L., Novak, T. P., & Peralta, M. (1999) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/299157.299175 · Cited by 2,132
Information Privacy Research: an Interdisciplinary Review1
Smith, H. J., Dinev, T., & Xu, H. (2011) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/41409970 · Cited by 2,013
Information Privacy Concerns, Procedural Fairness, and Impersonal Trust: An Empirical Investigation
Culnan, M. J., & Armstrong, P. K. (1999) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.10.1.104 · Cited by 1,870
Self-citationThe Privacy Paradox: Personal Information Disclosure Intentions versus Behaviors
NORBERG, P. A., HORNE, D. R., & HORNE, D. A. (2007) · Journal of Consumer Affairs · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6606.2006.00070.x · Cited by 1,526
Metadata
- Authors
- Culnan, M. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Direct Marketing
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1995-05
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 10-19
- ISSN
- 0892-0591 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-7138
- OpenAlex
- W2050412482
- Cited by
- 226
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.