Cited by 2,132Privacy, Security, and Data ProtectionTechnology Adoption and User BehaviourInformation and Cyber Security

Building consumer trust online

Open access
Hoffman, Donna L., Novak, Thomas P., Peralta, Marcos·1999·Communications of the ACM

Abstract

The reason more people have yet to shop online or even provide information to Web providers in exchange for access to information, is the fundamental lack of faith between most businesses and consumers on the Web today. In essence, consumers simply do not trust most Web providers enough to engage in "relationship exchanges" involving money and personal information with them. Research reveals that this lack of trust arises from the fact that cyberconsumers feel they lack control over the access that Web merchants have to their personal information during the online navigation process. These concerns over privacy span dimensions of environmental control and secondary use of information control. Recognizing consumers' rights to data ownership on the Internet is an important first step in this rebalancing process. At a minimum, it means market-driven industry acceptance and enforcement of opt-out policies regarding information exchange. Eventually, the industry should accede to consumer demand and move toward opt-in, informed-consent policies in computer-mediated environments.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/299157.299175

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [1]1. Achs, N. 1998 Online Shopping Report: Strategies for Driving Consumer Transactions . Jupiter Communications, Digital Commerce Group, New York, 1997 (www.jup.com).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hoffman, D. L., Novak, T. P., & Peralta, M.
Affiliations
Vanderbilt University (US)
Venue
Communications of the ACM
Published
1999-04
Volume
42
Issue
4
Pages
80-85
ISSN
  • 0001-0782 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7317
OpenAlex
W2065189722
Cited by
2,132
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 71 · 2021: 77 · 2020: 80 · 2019: 74 · 2018: 69 · 2017: 54 · 2016: 93 · 2015: 111 · 2014: 99 · 2013: 98 · 2012: 120
FWCI
169.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Communications of the ACM (publishedVersion)
  • UCLA - Biblioteca de Ciencias y Tecnologia Felix Morales Bueno (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
Keywords
online consumer trust, privacy, personal data control, data ownership, opt-in consent, informed consent, online shopping

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review