The DOI matches its Crossref record; 74 of the 74 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Predictive factors for diabetic foot ulceration: a systematic review
Abstract
Summary: Improving ability to predict and prevent diabetic foot ulceration is imperative because of the high personal and financial costs of this complication. We therefore conducted a systematic review in order to identify all studies of factors associated with DFU and assess whether available DFU risk stratification systems incorporate those factors of highest potential value. We performed a search in PubMed for studies published through April 2011 that analysed the association between independent variables and DFU. Articles were selected by two investigators‐independently and blind to each other. Divergences were solved by a third investigator. A total of 71 studies were included that evaluated the association between diabetic foot ulceration and more than 100 independent variables. The variables most frequently assessed were age, gender, diabetes duration, BMI, HbA 1c and neuropathy. Diabetic foot ulceration prevalence varied greatly among studies. The majority of the identified variables were assessed by only two or fewer studies. Diabetic neuropathy, peripheral vascular disease, foot deformity and previous diabetic foot ulceration or lower extremity amputation – which are the most common variables included in risk stratification systems – were consistently associated with diabetic foot ulceration development. Existing diabetic foot ulceration risk stratification systems often include variables shown repeatedly in the literature to be strongly predictive of this outcome. Improvement of these risk classification systems though is impaired because of deficiencies noted, including a great lack of standardization in outcome definition and variable selection and measurement. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
von Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gøtzsche, P. C., Vandenbroucke, J. P., & Initiative, F. T. S. (2007) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0040296 · Cited by 23,020
The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration
Altman, D. G., Schulz, K. F., Moher, D., Egger, M., Davidoff, F., Elbourne, D., Gøtzsche, P. C., Lang, T., & for the CONSORT Group (2001) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-134-8-200104170-00012 · Cited by 3,835
The global burden of diabetic foot disease
Boulton, A. J., Vileikyte, L., Ragnarson-Tennvall, G., & Apelqvist, J. (2005) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(05)67698-2 · Cited by 2,566
Abbott, C. A., Carrington, A. L., Ashe, H., Bath, S., Every, L. C., Griffiths, J., Hann, A. W., Hussein, A., Jackson, N., Johnson, K. E., et al. (2002) · Diabetic Medicine · doi:10.1046/j.1464-5491.2002.00698.x · Cited by 1,056
A prospective study of risk factors for diabetic foot ulcer. The Seattle Diabetic Foot Study.
Boyko, E. J., Ahroni, J. H., Stensel, V, Forsberg, R. C., Davignon, D. R., & Smith, D. G. (1999) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.22.7.1036 · Cited by 699
Self-citationPham, H., Armstrong, D. G., Harvey, C., Harkless, L. B., Giurini, J. M., & Veves, A. (2000) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.23.5.606 · Cited by 654 · cited 9×
“With this cut-off, one study [52] reported a sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 85% for active or recently healed DFU, another [67] 92% and 39%, respectively, for the detection of active or past DFU and still another [20] of 86% and 56%, respectively, for the prediction of DFU development.”
BackgroundInfluentialPractical Criteria for Screening Patients at High Risk for Diabetic Foot Ulceration
Lavery, L. A., Armstrong, D. G., Vela, S. A., Quebedeaux, T. L., & Fleischli, J. G. (1998) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.158.2.157 · Cited by 482
Role of Neuropathy and High Foot Pressures in Diabetic Foot Ulceration
Frykberg, R. G., Lavery, L. A., Pham, H., Harvey, C., Harkless, L., & Veves, A. (1998) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.21.10.1714 · Cited by 464
Choosing a Practical Screening Instrument to Identify Patients at Risk for Diabetic Foot Ulceration
Armstrong, D. G., Lavery, L. A., Vela, S. A., Quebedeaux, T. L., & Fleischli, J. G. (1998) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.158.3.289 · Cited by 451
Skin Temperature Monitoring Reduces the Risk for Diabetic Foot Ulceration in High-risk Patients
Armstrong, D. G., Holtz-Neiderer, K., Wendel, C., Mohler, M. J., Kimbriel, H. R., & Lavery, L. A. (2007) · The American Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2007.06.028 · Cited by 437
Cited by
Diabetic foot ulcers and their recurrence
Armstrong, D. G., Boulton, A. J. M., & Bus, S. A. (2017) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra1615439 · Cited by 4,376
Guidelines on the prevention of foot ulcers in persons with diabetes (IWGDF 2019 update)
Bus, S. A., Lavery, L. A., Monteiro‐Soares, M., Rasmussen, A., Raspovic, A., Sacco, I. C. N., van Netten, J. J., & on behalf of the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (2020) · Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews · doi:10.1002/dmrr.3269 · Cited by 517
Self-citationHinchliffe, R. J., Forsythe, R. O., Apelqvist, J., Boyko, E. J., Fitridge, R., Hong, J. P., Katsanos, K., Mills, J. L., Nikol, S., Reekers, J., et al. (2020) · Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews · doi:10.1002/dmrr.3276 · Cited by 383
Self-citationThe independent contribution of diabetic foot ulcer on lower extremity amputation and mortality risk
Martins-Mendes, D., Monteiro-Soares, M., Boyko, E. J., Ribeiro, M., Barata, P., Lima, J., & Soares, R. (2014) · Journal of Diabetes and its Complications · doi:10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2014.04.011 · Cited by 286
Self-citationGuidelines on the prevention of foot ulcers in persons with diabetes (IWGDF 2023 update)
Bus, S. A., Sacco, I. C. N., Monteiro‐Soares, M., Raspovic, A., Paton, J., Rasmussen, A., Lavery, L. A., & van Netten, J. J. (2024) · Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews · doi:10.1002/dmrr.3651 · Cited by 279
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Monteiro‐Soares, M., Boyko, E. J., Ribeiro, J., Ribeiro, I., & Dinis‐Ribeiro, M.
- Venue
- Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-10
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 574-600
- ISSN
- 1520-7552 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-7560
- OpenAlex
- W1560874819
- Cited by
- 322
- References
- 74
- FWCI
- 1.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predictive factors for diabetic foot ulceration: a systematic review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/dmrr.2319
- The paper
- Monteiro‐Soares, M., Boyko, E. J., Ribeiro, J., Ribeiro, I., & Dinis‐Ribeiro, M. (2012). Predictive factors for diabetic foot ulceration: a systematic review. Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1002/dmrr.2319
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
