The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Guidelines on use of interventions to enhance healing of chronic foot ulcers in diabetes (IWGDF 2019 update)
Open accessAbstract
The International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) has published evidence‐based guidelines on the prevention and management of diabetic foot disease since 1999. In conjunction with advice from internal and external reviewers and expert consultants in the field, this update is based on a systematic review of the literature centred on the following: the Population (P), Intervention (I), Comparator (C) and Outcomes (O) framework; the use of the SIGN guideline/Cochrane review system; and the 21 point scoring system advocated by IWGDF/EWMA. This has resulted in 13 recommendations. The recommendation on sharp debridement and the selection of dressings remain unchanged from the last recommendations published in 2016. The recommendation to consider negative pressure wound therapy in post‐surgical wounds and the judicious use of hyperbaric oxygen therapy in certain non‐healing ischaemic ulcers also remains unchanged. Recommendations against the use of growth factors, autologous platelet gels, bioengineered skin products, ozone, topical carbon dioxide, nitric oxide or interventions reporting improvement of ulcer healing through an alteration of the physical environment or through other systemic medical or nutritional means also remain. New recommendations include consideration of the use of sucrose‐octasulfate impregnated dressings in difficult to heal neuro‐ischaemic ulcers and consideration of the use of autologous combined leucocyte, platelet and fibrin patch in ulcers that are difficult to heal, in both cases when used in addition to best standard of care. A further new recommendation is the consideration of topical placental derived products when used in addition to best standard of care.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
Guyatt, G. H., Oxman, A. D., Vist, G. E., Kunz, R., Falck-Ytter, Y., Alonso-Coello, P., & Schünemann, H. J. (2008) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.ad · Cited by 23,305 · cited 2×
“of the available evidence, followed by developing recommendations and their rationale.(2,3)”
BackgroundMethodAlonso-Coello, P., Oxman, A. D., Moberg, J., Brignardello-Petersen, R., Akl, E. A., Davoli, M., Treweek, S., Mustafa, R. A., Vandvik, P. O., Meerpohl, J., et al. (2016) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.i2089 · Cited by 814
Hyperbaric oxygen therapy facilitates healing of chronic foot ulcers in patients with diabetes.
Löndahl, M., Katzman, P., Nilsson, A., & Hammarlund, C. (2010) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc09-1754 · Cited by 441 · cited 1×
“Of two early RCTs(38,39) with low risk of bias, the larger demonstrated a significantly improved outcome in the intervention group, whose ulcers were more likely to heal within 12 months.(39) Of note, the intervention”
BackgroundA clinical trial of Integra Template for diabetic foot ulcer treatment
Driver, V. R., Lavery, L. A., Reyzelman, A. M., Dutra, T. G., Dove, C. R., Kotsis, S. V., Kim, H. M., & Chung, K. C. (2015) · Wound Repair and Regeneration · doi:10.1111/wrr.12357 · Cited by 291
Self-citationEdmonds, M., Lázaro-Martínez, J. L., Alfayate-García, J. M., Martini, J., Petit, J.-M., Rayman, G., Lobmann, R., Uccioli, L., Sauvadet, A., Bohbot, S., et al. (2018) · The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/s2213-8587(17)30438-2 · Cited by 275
Self-citationJeffcoate, W. J., Bus, S. A., Game, F. L., Hinchliffe, R. J., Price, P. E., & Schaper, N. C. (2016) · The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/s2213-8587(16)30012-2 · Cited by 234
Self-citationNegative pressure wound therapy for treating foot wounds in people with diabetes mellitus.
Liu, Z., Dumville, J. C., Hinchliffe, R. J., Cullum, N., Game, F., Stubbs, N., Sweeting, M., & Peinemann, F. (2018) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd010318.pub3 · Cited by 173
Self-citation
Cited by
Falanga, V., Isseroff, R. R., Soulika, A. M., Romanelli, M., Margolis, D., Kapp, S., Granick, M., & Harding, K. (2022) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/s41572-022-00377-3 · Cited by 1,020
Guidelines on the prevention of foot ulcers in persons with diabetes (IWGDF 2019 update)
Bus, S. A., Lavery, L. A., Monteiro‐Soares, M., Rasmussen, A., Raspovic, A., Sacco, I. C. N., van Netten, J. J., & on behalf of the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (2020) · Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews · doi:10.1002/dmrr.3269 · Cited by 517
Chen, P., Vilorio, N. C., Dhatariya, K., Jeffcoate, W., Lobmann, R., McIntosh, C., Piaggesi, A., Steinberg, J., Vas, P., Viswanathan, V., et al. (2024) · Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews · doi:10.1002/dmrr.3644 · Cited by 246
Metadata
- Authors
- Rayman, G., Vas, P., Dhatariya, K., Driver, V., Hartemann, A., Londahl, M., Piaggesi, A., Apelqvist, J., Attinger, C., Game, F., & on behalf of the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF)
- Venue
- Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-03
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- S1
- Pages
- e3283-e3283
- ISSN
- 1520-7552 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-7560
- OpenAlex
- W3012353290
- Cited by
- 205
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 24.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
