The DOI matches its Crossref record; 296 of the 296 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Chronic wounds
Open accessAbstract
Chronic wounds are characterized by their inability to heal within an expected time frame and have emerged as an increasingly important clinical problem over the past several decades, owing to their increasing incidence and greater recognition of associated morbidity and socio-economic burden. Even up to a few years ago, the management of chronic wounds relied on standards of care that were outdated. However, the approach to these chronic conditions has improved, with better prevention, diagnosis and treatment. Such improvements are due to major advances in understanding of cellular and molecular aspects of basic science, in innovative and technological breakthroughs in treatment modalities from biomedical engineering, and in our ability to conduct well-controlled and reliable clinical research. The evidence-based approaches resulting from these advances have become the new standard of care. At the same time, these improvements are tempered by the recognition that persistent gaps exist in scientific knowledge of impaired healing and the ability of clinicians to reduce morbidity, loss of limb and mortality. Therefore, taking stock of what is known and what is needed to improve understanding of chronic wounds and their associated failure to heal is crucial to ensuring better treatments and outcomes. Chronic wounds are wounds that do not heal in an expected time frame owing to prolonged dysregulated inflammation. In this Primer, Falanga and colleagues review the epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment of chronic wounds as well as their effects on patients’ quality of life.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1992) · PubMed · Cited by 33,716
The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual Framework and Item Selection
Ware, J. E., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002 · Cited by 30,033
MicroRNAs: Target Recognition and Regulatory Functions
Bartel, D. P. (2009) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.002 · Cited by 20,068
EuroQol: a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life
(1990) · Health Policy · doi:10.1016/0168-8510(90)90421-9 · Cited by 15,736
Pattern Recognition Receptors and Inflammation
Takeuchi, O., & Akira, S. (2010) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2010.01.022 · Cited by 8,895
Diabetic foot ulcers and their recurrence
Armstrong, D. G., Boulton, A. J. M., & Bus, S. A. (2017) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra1615439 · Cited by 4,376
Wound repair and regeneration: Mechanisms, signaling, and translation
Eming, S. A., Martin, P., & Tomic-Canic, M. (2014) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3009337 · Cited by 3,562
Preventing Foot Ulcers in Patients With Diabetes
Singh, N. (2005) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.293.2.217 · Cited by 3,097
Wound Healing: A Cellular Perspective
Rodrigues, M., Kosaric, N., Bonham, C. A., & Gurtner, G. C. (2019) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00067.2017 · Cited by 3,013
Human skin wounds: A major and snowballing threat to public health and the economy
Sen, C. K., Gordillo, G. M., Roy, S., Kirsner, R., Lambert, L., Hunt, T. K., Gottrup, F., Gurtner, G. C., & Longaker, M. T. (2009) · Wound Repair and Regeneration · doi:10.1111/j.1524-475x.2009.00543.x · Cited by 2,965
Cited by
Living Microecological Hydrogels for Wound Healing
Chen, G., Wang, F., Zhang, X., Shang, Y., & Zhao, Y. (2023) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.adg3478 · Cited by 196
Johnson, J., Law, S. Q. K., Shojaee, M., Hall, A. S., Bhuiyan, S., Lim, M. B. L., Silva, A., Kong, K. J. W., Schoppet, M., Blyth, C., et al. (2023) · Journal of Extracellular Vesicles · doi:10.1002/jev2.12332 · Cited by 188
Stimuli‐Responsive Hydrogels for Antibacterial Applications
Hao, Z., Li, X., Zhang, R., & Zhang, L. (2024) · Advanced Healthcare Materials · doi:10.1002/adhm.202400513 · Cited by 135
Machado, P., Ribeiro, F. N., Giublin, F. C. W., Mieres, N. G., Tonin, F. S., Pontarolo, R., Sari, M. H. M., Lazo, R. E. L., & Ferreira, L. M. (2025) · Pharmaceuticals · doi:10.3390/ph18050704 · Cited by 44
Tang, Q., Tan, Y., Leng, S., Liu, Q., Zhu, L., & Wang, C. (2024) · Materials Today Bio · doi:10.1016/j.mtbio.2024.101087 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Falanga, V., Isseroff, R. R., Soulika, A. M., Romanelli, M., Margolis, D., Kapp, S., Granick, M., & Harding, K.
- Venue
- Nature Reviews Disease Primers
- Published
- 2022-07-21
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 50-50
- ISSN
- 2056-676X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4286490573
- Cited by
- 1,020
- References
- 296
- FWCI
- 39.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chronic wounds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41572-022-00377-3
- The paper
- Falanga, V., Isseroff, R. R., Soulika, A. M., Romanelli, M., Margolis, D., Kapp, S., Granick, M., & Harding, K. (2022). Chronic wounds. Nature Reviews Disease Primers. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572-022-00377-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.