Climate change and the eco‐hydrology of fire: Will area burned increase in a warming western USA?
Abstract
Wildfire area is predicted to increase with global warming. Empirical statistical models and process‐based simulations agree almost universally. The key relationship for this unanimity, observed at multiple spatial and temporal scales, is between drought and fire. Predictive models often focus on ecosystems in which this relationship appears to be particularly strong, such as mesic and arid forests and shrublands with substantial biomass such as chaparral. We examine the drought–fire relationship, specifically the correlations between water‐balance deficit and annual area burned, across the full gradient of deficit in the western USA, from temperate rainforest to desert. In the middle of this gradient, conditional on vegetation (fuels), correlations are strong, but outside this range the equivalence hotter and drier equals more fire either breaks down or is contingent on other factors such as previous‐year climate. This suggests that the regional drought–fire dynamic will not be stationary in future climate, nor will other more complex contingencies associated with the variation in fire extent. Predictions of future wildfire area therefore need to consider not only vegetation changes, as some dynamic vegetation models now do, but also potential changes in the drought–fire dynamic that will ensue in a warming climate.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Many ecosystems represent some mixture of fuel- or flammability-limited fire regimes, termed 'hybrid' systems.
“Notably, many ecosystems represent some mixture of fuelor flammability-limited fire regimes, termed 'hybrid' systems by McKenzie and Littell (2017).”
From Fire as a fundamental ecological process: Research advances and frontiers (2020) · cites this paper as McKenzie & Littell, 2017
In systems where fuel is abundant but generally too moist to burn, changes toward a warmer, drier climate are expected to decrease fuel moisture content and increase fire activity.
“In those systems where fuel is abundant but generally too moist to burn, changes toward a warmer, drier climate are expected to decrease fuel moisture content and increase fire activity (McKenzie & Littell, 2017).”
From Fire as a fundamental ecological process: Research advances and frontiers (2020) · cites this paper as McKenzie & Littell, 2017
Cites
Parks, S. A., Holsinger, L. M., Miller, C., & Nelson, C. R. (2015) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/14-1430.1 · Cited by 239 · see citing works
Williams, A. P., & Abatzoglou, J. T. (2016) · Current Climate Change Reports · doi:10.1007/s40641-016-0031-0 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
Kolden, C. A., Smith, A. M. S., & Abatzoglou, J. T. (2015) · International Journal of Wildland Fire · doi:10.1071/wf15082 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Climate, CO <sub>2</sub> and human population impacts on global wildfire emissions
Knorr, W., Jiang, L., & Arneth, A. (2016) · Biogeosciences · doi:10.5194/bg-13-267-2016 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fire as a fundamental ecological process: Research advances and frontiers
McLauchlan, K. K., Higuera, P. E., Miesel, J., Rogers, B. M., Schweitzer, J., Shuman, J. K., Tepley, A. J., Varner, J. M., Veblen, T. T., Adalsteinsson, S. A., et al. (2020) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2745.13403 · Cited by 729 · see citing works
“Notably, many ecosystems represent some mixture of fuel-or flammability-limited fire regimes, termed ‘hybrid’ systems by McKenzie and Littell (2017).”
Halofsky, J. E., Peterson, D. L., & Harvey, B. J. (2020) · Fire Ecology · doi:10.1186/s42408-019-0062-8 · Cited by 640 · see citing works
The North American tree‐ring fire‐scar network
Margolis, E. Q., Guiterman, C. H., Chavardès, R. D., Coop, J. D., Copes‐Gerbitz, K., Dawe, D. A., Falk, D. A., Johnston, J. D., Larson, E., Li, H., et al. (2022) · Ecosphere · doi:10.1002/ecs2.4159 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- McKenzie, D., & Littell, J. S.
- Affiliations
- US Forest Service (US)
- United States Geological Survey (US)
- Corresponding author
- McKenzie, Donald
- Venue
- Ecological Applications
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-12-21
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 26-36
- ISSN
- 1051-0761 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-5582
- OpenAlex
- W2507742528
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 12.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Ecological Applications (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Forest Service
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
- Keywords
- climate change, ecohydrology, American West, fire prediction, vegetation-climate feedback, chaparral, arid shrubland, temperate rainforest, desert
- MeSH terms
- Wildfires, Fires, Models, Statistical, Ecosystem, Droughts, Climate Change, Global Warming, Hydrology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review