The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The validity and clinical utility of binge eating disorder
Abstract
Objective: This review attempted to examine the validity and clinical utility of the DSM‐IV binge eating disorder (BED) diagnosis across a wide range of validating strategies. Method: Various electronic databases (Pub Med, Psych Info) were searched for terms relevant to the diagnosis of BED (e.g., binge eating disorder, binge eating) in order to identify papers. Additionally, published papers were reviewed in order to locate additional manuscripts and papers that were presented at meetings. Results: The validity and utility of BED varied substantially according to the validator chosen. There is reasonable evidence that BED can be differentiated from other existing eating disorders and is associated with significant impairment and clinical levels of eating disorder psychopathology. The relationship of BED to obesity is complex, and in spite of some positive findings, further research examining the predictive power of BED, beyond the simple presence of obesity and associated psychopathology, in relationship to clinically relevant outcomes is needed. Discussion: Binge eating disorder is being considered for inclusion in the DSM‐V and various options regarding this decision are reviewed based upon the empirical findings in the paper. © 2009 American Psychiatric Association.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR)
American Psychiatric Association (2000) · doi:10.1176/appi.books.9780890423349 · Cited by 11,069
The prevalence and correlates of eating disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication
Hudson, J. I., Hiripi, E., Pope, H. G., & Kessler, R. C. (2007) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.03.040 · Cited by 4,973
Psychological Treatments of Binge Eating Disorder
Wilson, G. T., Wilfley, D. E., Agras, W. S., & Bryson, S. W. (2010) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2009.170 · Cited by 492
Eating disorders in White and Black women
Striegel-Moore, R. H., Dohm, F. A., Kraemer, H. C., Taylor, C. B., Daniels, S., Crawford, P. B., & Schreiber, G. B. (2003) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.160.7.1326 · Cited by 302
Tanofsky-Kraff, M., Cohen, M. L., Yanovski, S. Z., Cox, C., Theim, K. R., Keil, M., Reynolds, J. C., & Yanovski, J. A. (2006) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2005-1329 · Cited by 258
Grilo, C. M., & Masheb, R. M. (2005) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2004.11.010 · Cited by 199
Application of a Latent Class Analysis to Empirically Define EatingDisorder Phenotypes
Keel, P. K., Fichter, M., Quadflieg, N., Bulik, C. M., Baxter, M. G., Thornton, L., Halmi, K. A., Kaplan, A. S., Strober, M., Woodside, D. B., et al. (2004) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.61.2.192 · Cited by 181
Self-citationJavaras, K. N., Laird, N. M., Reichborn‐Kjennerud, T., Bulik, C. M., Pope, H. G., & Hudson, J. I. (2008) · International Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1002/eat.20484 · Cited by 172
A comparison of quality of life in obese individuals with and without binge eating disorder
Rieger, E., Wilfley, D. E., Stein, R. I., Marino, V., & Crow, S. J. (2005) · International Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1002/eat.20101 · Cited by 164
Striegel-Moore, R. H., & Franko, D. L. (2008) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.4.022007.141149 · Cited by 146
Cited by
Epidemiology of Eating Disorders: Incidence, Prevalence and Mortality Rates
Smink, F. R. E., van Hoeken, D., & Hoek, H. W. (2012) · Current Psychiatry Reports · doi:10.1007/s11920-012-0282-y · Cited by 1,978
Stice, E., Marti, C. N., & Rohde, P. (2013) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0030679 · Cited by 822
Reed, G. M., First, M. B., Kogan, C. S., Hyman, S. E., Gureje, O., Gaebel, W., Maj, M., Stein, D. J., Maercker, A., Tyrer, P., et al. (2019) · World Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/wps.20611 · Cited by 765
Prevalence and severity of DSM‐5 eating disorders in a community cohort of adolescents
Smink, F. R. E., van Hoeken, D., Oldehinkel, A. J., & Hoek, H. W. (2014) · International Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1002/eat.22316 · Cited by 415
Psychiatric diagnosis: Lessons from the DSM-IV past and cautions for the DSM-5 future
Frances, A. J., & Widiger, T. (2012) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032511-143102 · Cited by 271
Metadata
- Authors
- Wonderlich, S. A., Gordon, K. H., Mitchell, J. E., Crosby, R. D., & Engel, S. G.
- Venue
- International Journal of Eating Disorders
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-07-20
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 687-705
- ISSN
- 0276-3478 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-108X
- OpenAlex
- W1994383563
- Cited by
- 276
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 29.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The validity and clinical utility of binge eating disorder. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/eat.20719
- The paper
- Wonderlich, S. A., Gordon, K. H., Mitchell, J. E., Crosby, R. D., & Engel, S. G. (2009). The validity and clinical utility of binge eating disorder. International Journal of Eating Disorders. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.20719
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.