Cited by 233Eating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorChild Nutrition and Feeding Issues

Validity and utility of the current definition of binge eating

Wolfe, Barbara E., Baker, Christina Wood, Smith, Adrian T., Kelly‐Weeder, Susan·2009·International Journal of Eating Disorders

Abstract

Objective: Binge eating, a cardinal symptom of bulimia nervosa (BN) and binge eating disorder (BED), continues to pose challenges in terms of its definition and thus construct validity and clinical utility. This article reviews the available empirical data that support or refute the current DSM‐IV‐TR defined characteristics of a binge episode. Method: A systematic literature review was conducted using Medline/PubMed electronic database on DSM‐IV‐TR defined binge characteristics and associated attributes. Results: Data support the current DSM guidelines indicating that binge episodes typically occur in less than 2 h. Size of binge episodes has variability across BN and BED diagnostic groups. Loss of control (LOC) continues to be a core feature of binge eating. Negative affect is the most widely reported antecedent. Strikingly, little is known about binge episodes among individuals with anorexia nervosa‐binge/purge subtype. Discussion: Available empirical evidence supports the current DSM duration and LOC attributes of a binge episode in BN and BED. However, a more controversial issues is the extent to which size is important in the definition of a binge episode (e.g., subjective vs. objective episodes) across diagnostic categories and the extent to which binge size informs prognosis, treatment, and clinical outcomes. Further study of binge eating attributes in AN is needed. © 2009 American Psychiatric Association. Int J Eat Disord 2009

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/eat.20728

Cites

123 of 123 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 127 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wolfe, B. E., Baker, C. W., Smith, A. T., & Kelly‐Weeder, S.
Affiliations
  • Boston College (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Wolfe, Barbara E.
Venue
International Journal of Eating Disorders
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-07-16
Volume
42
Issue
8
Pages
674-686
ISSN
  • 0276-3478 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-108X
OpenAlex
W1991734026
Cited by
233
References
127
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 23
FWCI
2.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Eating Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
Keywords
binge eating, DSM-IV-TR, bulimia nervosa, binge eating disorder, loss of control, negative affect, construct validity, eating disorder diagnosis
MeSH terms
Bulimia, Feeding Behavior, Humans, Surveys and Questionnaires, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Bulimia Nervosa, Binge-Eating Disorder

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review