The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Why men should be included in research on binge eating: Results from a comparison of psychosocial impairment in men and women
Abstract
Objective: Prevalence of binge eating has been shown to be as common in men as in women, yet few studies have included men. Men are especially underrepresented in treatment studies, raising the question of whether men who binge eat experience less distress or impairment than women. This study compared demographic and clinical correlates of binge eating in a large employee sample of men and women. Method: Cross‐sectional data from 21,743 men and 24,608 women who participated in a health risk self assessment screening were used. Group differences in obesity, hypertension, dyslipidemia, Type 2 diabetes, depression, stress, sleep, sick days, work impairment, and nonwork activity impairment were tested using chi‐square tests (categorical variables) and independent sample t‐tests (continuous variables). Results: Effect size estimates indicate that men (n = 1,630) and women (n = 2,754) who binge eat experience comparable levels of clinical impairment. They also report substantially greater impairment when compared with men and women who do not binge eat. Discussion: The underrepresentation of men in treatment‐seeking samples does not appear to reflect lower levels of impairment in men versus women. Efforts are needed to raise awareness of the clinical significance of binge eating in men so that this group can receive appropriate screening and treatment services. © 2011 by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. (Int J Eat Disord 2012)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The prevalence and correlates of eating disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication
Hudson, J. I., Hiripi, E., Pope, H. G., & Kessler, R. C. (2007) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.03.040 · Cited by 4,973
Psychological Treatments of Binge Eating Disorder
Wilson, G. T., Wilfley, D. E., Agras, W. S., & Bryson, S. W. (2010) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2009.170 · Cited by 492
Measures of Clinical Significance
KRAEMER, H. C., MORGAN, G. A., LEECH, N. L., GLINER, J. A., VASKE, J. J., & HARMON, R. J. (2003) · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/00004583-200312000-00022 · Cited by 367
Binge eating disorder treatment: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
Brownley, K. A., Berkman, N. D., Sedway, J. A., Lohr, K. N., & Bulik, C. M. (2007) · International Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1002/eat.20370 · Cited by 346
Validity and utility of the current definition of binge eating
Wolfe, B. E., Baker, C. W., Smith, A. T., & Kelly‐Weeder, S. (2009) · International Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1002/eat.20728 · Cited by 233
Cognitive Behavioral Guided Self-Help for the Treatment of Recurrent Binge Eating
Striegel-Moore, R. H., Wilson, G. T., DeBar, L., Perrin, N., Lynch, F., Rosselli, F., & Kraemer, H. C. (2010) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0018915 · Cited by 119
Guided Self-Help Treatment for Recurrent Binge Eating: Replication and Extension
DeBar, L. L., Striegel-Moore, R. H., Wilson, G. T., Perrin, N., Yarborough, B. J., Dickerson, J., Lynch, F., Rosselli, F., & Kraemer, H. C. (2011) · Psychiatric Services · doi:10.1176/ps.62.4.pss6204_0367 · Cited by 32
Cited by
Kessler, R. C., Berglund, P. A., Chiu, W. T., Deitz, A. C., Hudson, J. I., Shahly, V., Aguilar-Gaxiola, S., Alonso, J., Angermeyer, M. C., Benjet, C., et al. (2013) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.11.020 · Cited by 1,338
The Science Behind the Academy for Eating Disorders' Nine Truths About Eating Disorders
Schaumberg, K., Welch, E., Breithaupt, L., Hübel, C., Baker, J. H., Munn‐Chernoff, M. A., Yilmaz, Z., Ehrlich, S., Mustelin, L., Ghaderi, A., et al. (2017) · European Eating Disorders Review · doi:10.1002/erv.2553 · Cited by 266
Striegel Weissman, R., & Rosselli, F. (2017) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2016.09.006 · Cited by 184
Access to evidence‐based care for eating disorders during the COVID ‐19 crisis
Weissman, R. S., Bauer, S., & Thomas, J. J. (2020) · International Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1002/eat.23279 · Cited by 143
Self-citationLee-Winn, A. E., Reinblatt, S. P., Mojtabai, R., & Mendelson, T. (2016) · Eating Behaviors · doi:10.1016/j.eatbeh.2016.03.021 · Cited by 78
Metadata
- Authors
- Striegel, R. H., Bedrosian, R., Wang, C., & Schwartz, S.
- Venue
- International Journal of Eating Disorders
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-10-26
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 233-240
- ISSN
- 0276-3478 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-108X
- OpenAlex
- W2155057537
- Cited by
- 178
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 11.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Why men should be included in research on binge eating: Results from a comparison of psychosocial impairment in men and women. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/eat.20962
- The paper
- Striegel, R. H., Bedrosian, R., Wang, C., & Schwartz, S. (2012). Why men should be included in research on binge eating: Results from a comparison of psychosocial impairment in men and women. International Journal of Eating Disorders. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.20962
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
