Cited by 390Eating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorChild Nutrition and Feeding Issues

Psychosocial risk factors for eating disorders

Keel, Pamela K., Forney, K. Jean·2013·International Journal of Eating Disorders

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: One goal in identifying psychosocial risk factors is to discover opportunities for intervention. The purpose of this review is to examine psychosocial risk factors for disordered eating, placing research findings in the larger context of how etiological models for eating disorders can be transformed into models for intervention. METHOD: A qualitative literature review was conducted focusing on psychological and social factors that increase the risk for developing eating disorders, with an emphasis on well-replicated findings from prospective longitudinal studies. RESULTS: Epidemiological, cross-cultural, and longitudinal studies underscore the importance of the idealization of thinness and resulting weight concerns as psychosocial risk factors for eating disorders. Personality factors such as negative emotionality and perfectionism contribute to the development of eating disorders but may do so indirectly by increasing susceptibility to internalize the thin ideal or by influencing selection of peer environment. During adolescence, peers represent self-selected environments that influence risk. DISCUSSION: Peer context may represent a key opportunity for intervention, as peer groups represent the nexus in which individual differences in psychological risk factors shape the social environment and social environment shapes psychological risk factors. Thus, peer-based interventions that challenge internalization of the thin ideal can protect against the development of eating pathology.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/eat.22094

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Keel, P. K., & Forney, K. J.
Affiliations
Florida State University (US)
Venue
International Journal of Eating Disorders
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-05-09
Volume
46
Issue
5
Pages
433-439
ISSN
  • 0276-3478 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-108X
OpenAlex
W2162083463
Cited by
390
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 79 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 4
FWCI
4.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Eating Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
Keywords
eating disorders, psychosocial risk factors, thin ideal, weight concern, negative affectivity, perfectionism, peer influence, adolescent peer groups, peer intervention, etiological models, intervention model
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Body Image, Culture, Humans, Peer Group, Risk Factors, Social Environment, Thinness, Body Mass Index

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review