Cited by 17Eating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorPharmacology and Obesity Treatment

Nonmedical prescription stimulant use for suppressing appetite and controlling body weight is uniquely associated with more severe eating disorder symptomatology

Kilwein, Tess M., Goodman, Erica L., Looby, Alison, De Young, Kyle P.·2016·International Journal of Eating Disorders

Abstract

Objective: Nonmedical prescription stimulant use (NPS; i.e., use without a prescription or in ways other than prescribed) to suppress appetite or control weight appears to be associated with eating disorder (ED) symptomatology among college students. However, it remains unknown if this relationship is motive‐specific and uniquely related to ED symptomatology. This research examined whether engaging in NPS specifically for appetite/weight‐related purposes is associated with ED symptomatology and a unique indicator of more severe symptomatology. Method: A nonclinical sample of college students (N = 668; 79% female) reported eating disorder symptoms via the Eating Pathology Symptoms Inventory and Eating Disorder Examination‐Questionnaire, and lifetime history of NPS and corresponding motives. Results: Binge eating, body dissatisfaction, negative attitudes towards obesity, restricting, purging, and cognitive restraint were reported more frequently by students who endorsed NPS for weight/appetite‐related purposes than by those who used for other purposes or denied lifetime NPS. Additionally, NPS for appetite/weight‐related purposes was uniquely associated with ED symptomatology after adjusting for gender, lifetime NPS, and past‐month binge eating and purging. Discussion: Engaging in NPS for appetite/weight‐related purposes is a unique indicator of ED symptomatology, highlighting the need to query for this behavior among individuals with an ED. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. (Int J Eat Disord 2016; 49:813–816)

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/eat.22534

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kilwein, T. M., Goodman, E. L., Looby, A., & De Young, K. P.
Affiliations
  • University of North Dakota (US)
  • Department of Psychology University of North Dakota Grand Forks North Dakota
Corresponding author
Kilwein, Tess M.
Venue
International Journal of Eating Disorders
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-04-07
Volume
49
Issue
8
Pages
813-816
ISSN
  • 0276-3478 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-108X
OpenAlex
W2340245741
Cited by
17
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2
FWCI
3.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Eating Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
Keywords
appetite suppression, weight management, eating disorder symptoms, binge eating, body dissatisfaction, cognitive restraint, university students
MeSH terms
Adult, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Appetite Depressants, Body Weight, Bulimia, Cross-Sectional Studies, Nonprescription Drugs, Eating, Emotions, Female, Humans, Motivation, Obesity, Sex Factors, Students, Binge-Eating Disorder

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review