Cited by 57Eating Disorders and BehaviorsSuicide and Self-Harm StudiesPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

Suicidality in adolescents and adults with binge‐eating disorder: Results from the national comorbidity survey replication and adolescent supplement

Forrest, Lauren N., Zuromski, Kelly L., Dodd, Dorian R., Smith, April R.·2017·International Journal of Eating Disorders

Abstract

Objective: The relation between binge‐eating disorder (BED) and suicidality (i.e., suicide ideation, plan, and/or attempt) has not been studied extensively, and it is unknown whether BED is uniquely associated with suicidality when adjusting for comorbid psychopathology. Moreover, the course of suicidality in BED has not been determined and it is unknown whether BED precedes suicidality or vice versa. Method: A total of 10,123 adolescents and 2,980 adults from two nationally representative surveys were administered diagnostic interviews assessing psychopathology and suicidality, as well the retrospectively reported ages of onset. Results: Among adults and adolescents, BED was associated with elevated odds of suicide ideation, plan, and attempt at a univariate level, but BED was not associated with elevated odds of suicidality when adjusting for comorbid psychopathology. Kaplan–Meier estimates of temporal patterns displayed that most adolescents experienced suicidality onset following BED onset, whereas most adults experienced suicidality onset prior to BED onset. Discussion: BED, comorbid disorders, and suicidality share common factors and interrelations, and individuals with BED and comorbid disorders may be at particularly high risk for suicidal outcomes. The presence of BED in adolescence may serve as a marker for more severe symptomatology that precedes the occurrence of suicidality. Research is needed to understand how eating disorder symptoms, comorbid symptoms, and suicidality affect one another over time. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. (Int J Eat Disord 2017; 50:40–49)

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/eat.22582

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Forrest, L. N., Zuromski, K. L., Dodd, D. R., & Smith, A. R.
Affiliations
  • Miami University (US)
  • Auburn University (US)
Corresponding author
Smith, April R.
Venue
International Journal of Eating Disorders
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-07-20
Volume
50
Issue
1
Pages
40-49
ISSN
  • 0276-3478 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-108X
OpenAlex
W2491978237
Cited by
57
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6
FWCI
7.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Eating Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
binge eating disorder, suicidality, suicidal ideation, suicide planning, suicide attempts, comorbid psychopathology, eating disorders, adolescents, adults, age of onset, National Comorbidity Survey Replication
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Psychology, Adolescent, Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Suicide, United States, Comorbidity, Age of Onset, Young Adult, Binge-Eating Disorder, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review