Cited by 64Eating Disorders and BehaviorsPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

Posttraumatic stress disorder, traumatic events, and longitudinal eating disorder treatment outcomes: a systematic review

Open access
Convertino, Alexandra D., Mendoza, Rebecca R.·2023·International Journal of Eating Disorders

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Many individuals diagnosed with an eating disorder (ED) have been exposed to traumatic events, and some of these individuals are diagnosed with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Although theorized by researchers and clinicians, it is unclear whether traumatic event exposure or PTSD interferes with outcomes from ED treatment. The objective of the current study was to systematically review the literature on traumatic events and/or PTSD as either predictors or moderators of psychological treatment outcomes in EDs. METHOD: A PRISMA search was conducted to identify studies that assessed the longitudinal association between traumatic events or PTSD and ED outcomes. Eighteen articles met the inclusion criteria for review. RESULTS: Results indicated that traumatic event exposure was associated with greater ED treatment dropout, but individuals with a traumatic event history benefited from treatment similarly to their unexposed peers. Findings also indicated that traumatic events may be associated with greater symptom relapse posttreatment. DISCUSSION: Given the limited number of studies examining PTSD, results are considered very tentative; however, similar to studies comparing trauma-exposed and nontrauma-exposed participants, individuals with PTSD may have similar treatment gains compared to individuals without PTSD, but individuals with PTSD may experience greater symptom relapse posttreatment. Future researchers are encouraged to examine whether trauma-informed care or integrated treatment for EDs and PTSD mitigates dropout from treatment and improves symptom remission outcomes. Furthermore, researchers are encouraged to examine how the developmental timing of traumatic events, self-perceived impact of trauma, and cumulative trauma exposure may be associated with differential ED treatment outcomes. PUBLIC SIGNIFICANCE: Eating disorders (EDs), trauma, and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) often co-occur. Individuals with traumatic event exposure and/or PTSD demonstrate greater ED symptoms; it is unclear whether these individuals benefit similarly in ED treatment to their peers. The current study found that individuals with traumatic event exposure are more likely to drop out of treatment but benefit from treatment with similar symptom remission. Traumatic history was associated with greater relapse posttreatment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/eat.23933

Cites

86 of 86 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 92 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    A key limitation was that many included studies used measures without available or reported psychometric data.

    “A notable limitation of the included studies was measurement methods that did not have available or reported psychometric properties.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    The other studies relied on clinical interviews whose psychometric properties were unpublished or unspecified.

    “The remaining studies relied on clinical interviews with unpublished or unspecified psychometric properties.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Among 12 studies of trauma exposure and eating disorder outcomes, only four used trauma measures with published psychometric evaluations.

    “Of the 12 studies that examined the association between exposure to traumatic events and eating disorder treatment outcomes, less than a third of the studies (k = 4) used measures of traumatic events with published psychometric examinations.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Treatment dropout was an outcome in four studies.

    “Four studies examined treatment dropout as an outcome.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingcitation

    One study found no dropout difference between people exposed to childhood trauma before eating disorder onset and those not exposed.

    “Finally, one study did not find any difference between individuals that were exposed childhood traumatic events before the eating disorder onset and those that had not been exposed (Calugi et al., 2018).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Calugi et al., 2018

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 16
  • May combine two claims. 29
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Among seven studies of PTSD and eating disorder outcomes, five used clinical interviews and two used the PCL-5.

    “Similarly, of the seven studies that examined PTSD in association with eating disorder treatment outcomes, five studies assessed PTSD using clinical interviews, and two studies examined presumptive positive PTSD diagnoses based on the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5; Cook et al., 2022; Trottier, 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Cook et al., 2022

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Trottier, 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    One study found childhood sexual abuse significantly affected eating pathology trajectories over time, but this effect interacted with avoidant personality disorder.

    “The one study that demonstrated a significant effect of childhood sexual abuse on the trajectory of eating pathology scores over time (including treatment termination) found a significant moderation effect, such that this main effect was qualified by a significant interaction with avoidant personality disorder (Vrabel et al., 2010).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Vrabel et al., 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Quality ratings were weak for most studies (k = 10), moderate for seven, and strong for one.

    “Most studies were classified as weak (k = 10; see Tables 1 and 2 for global quality assessment ratings; Table 3 contains all quality assessment ratings by component). Seven studies were classified as moderate, and one study was classified as strong.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Twelve studies examined traumatic events, but only three assessed events across the lifespan.

    “Most studies (k = 12) examined traumatic events and of these studies, only three studies included traumatic events across the lifespan (Hicks, 2016; Luadzers, 1998; Rodríguez et al., 2005).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Hicks, 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Luadzers, 1998

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Rodríguez et al., 2005

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Of the clinician-rated PTSD studies, one used a validated interview (SCID) and four did not state which interview they used.

    “Of the studies that examined clinician-rated diagnoses, only one was stated to use a validated clinical interview (i.e., Structured Clinical Interview for DSM Disorders (SCID); Hazzard et al., 2021) while the other four studies did not specify the type of clinical interview conducted.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hazzard et al., 2021

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    The review included 18 articles that satisfied its criteria.

    “Eighteen articles met the inclusion criteria for review.”
    • Also stated in: § RESULTS · plain
      “Eighteen articles were included in the final review.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Studies differed greatly in how they defined traumatic events and how specific those definitions were.

    “Of these studies, the definitions and specificity of traumatic events varied widely.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Six of seven studies showed significant eating pathology reductions in both groups by end of treatment, with no group difference.

    “The majority of these studies (k = 6) demonstrated significant reductions in both groups in eating pathology at the end of treatment but no differences between the groups (K. P. Anderson et al., 1997; Calugi et al., 2018; Castellini et al., 2018; Hicks, 2016; Luadzers, 1998; Strangio et al., 2017)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites K. P. Anderson et al., 1997

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Calugi et al., 2018

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Castellini et al., 2018

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Five studies assessed current PTSD diagnosis at admission.

    “Most studies (k = 5) examined current diagnosis of PTSD at admission.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Cook et al. (2022) found that PTSD patients treated in 2020 improved less than 2019 patients regardless of PTSD status, and less than 2020 patients without PTSD.

    “They found that individuals with a PTSD diagnosis who were treated in 2020 experienced less symptom improvement than individuals that were treated in 2019, regardless of PTSD diagnosis, and individuals who were treated in 2020 without PTSD.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Cook et al., 2022

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    CBT was the most common treatment modality for eating disorders, though other treatments were also used.

    “Finally, cognitive behavioral therapy was most typically used as a treatment modality for eating disorders, although this was not the only form of treatment administered.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Traumatic event exposure and PTSD are not rare in eating disorder populations.

    “Traumatic event exposure and PTSD are therefore not uncommon in eating disorder populations.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In eating disorder samples, pooled prevalence estimates for current and lifetime PTSD are 18.35% when weighted by sample size and 24.59% when weighted by methodological quality, and may be higher in inpatient than outpatient settings.

    “In samples of individuals with an eating disorder, a recent systematic review determined that pooled prevalence estimates of both current and lifetime PTSD were 18.35% when weighted by sample size and 24.59% when weighted by methodological quality, although these estimates may be higher in inpatient settings compared to outpatient settings (Ferrell et al., 2022).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ferrell et al., 2022

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Findings are inconsistent about whether trauma history or PTSD reduces eating disorder symptom improvement during treatment; some studies report worse efficacy and others report no difference.

    “However, the evidence that eating disorder symptom reduction during eating disorder treatment is impaired by a history of experiencing traumatic events or PTSD is mixed, with some studies finding that exposure to traumatic events and/or a diagnosis of PTSD in individuals leads to reduced efficacy compared with unexposed or undiagnosed peers (e.g., Rodríguez et al., 2005) and some finding no differ”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Rodríguez et al., 2005

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites K. S. Mitchell, Singh, et al., 2021

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    An earlier review found it unknown whether trauma exposure or PTSD affects eating disorder treatment outcomes.

    “However, a previous review concluded that the effect of traumatic event exposure and/or PTSD on eating disorder treatment outcomes is unknown (Trottier & MacDonald, 2017).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Trottier & MacDonald, 2017

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Differences in quality ratings were settled by discussion and consensus.

    “Disagreements between raters were resolved through discussion and a final rating was achieved through consensus.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Searches covered MEDLINE, PsycInfo, Web of Science, CINAHL, Google Scholar, and ProQuest from July through August 2022, plus a final search on September 2, 2022.

    “Articles were identified by searching the online databases of MEDLINE, PsycInfo, Web of Science, CINAHL, Google Scholar, and ProQuest between July and August 2022. A final search was conducted on September 2nd, 2022.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation

    The systematic review protocol was guided by the 2020 PRISMA guidelines.

    “The protocol for the systematic review was based on the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines (Page et al., 2021).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Page et al., 2021

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Study quality did not determine inclusion or exclusion; all studies were kept regardless of their quality rating.

    “While assessed, no inclusion/exclusion criteria were imposed based on the study quality rating. Therefore, studies were included regardless of the quality rating.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    Uncertain screening decisions were discussed until the authors agreed.

    “After screening, the authors discussed any papers where there was uncertainty about inclusion until a consensus was reached.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Because most studies covered only childhood trauma, the findings warrant caution.

    “Therefore, while the current study includes traumatic events from across the lifespan, results should be taken with some caution given that most studies only included childhood traumatic events.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Compared with people who have an eating disorder only, those with both an eating disorder and PTSD report more general eating pathology, more depressive and anxiety symptoms, and worse quality of life.

    “Similarly, individuals with both an eating disorder and PTSD diagnosis present with greater general eating pathology, greater depressive symptoms, greater anxiety symptoms, and poorer quality of life compared with those diagnosed with an eating disorder alone (Brewerton et al., 2020)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Brewerton et al., 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    This review lacked preregistration because it began as doctoral training work and was not eligible for PROSPERO registration.

    “This review was not preregistered as it was originally conducted in fulfillment of doctoral training requirements and therefore ineligible for registration on PROSPERO.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Authors screened studies separately; agreement was 96% for titles/abstracts and 97% for full texts.

    “Each author conducted study screening independently. The agreement rate was 96% at the title and abstract screening and 97% at full text.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    People with an eating disorder plus PTSD also report more general eating pathology, more depressive and anxiety symptoms, and worse quality of life than people with trauma exposure who do not meet PTSD criteria.

    “and even compared with individuals with a history of traumatic events but do not meet criteria for PTSD (Scharff, Ortiz, Forrest, & Smith, 2021).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Scharff, Ortiz, Forrest, & Smith, 2021

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Symptoms of PTSD, including negative changes in cognition, may create or intensify negative self- and body-beliefs, which can contribute to overvaluation of eating, weight, and shape and their control, perfectionism, and low self-esteem.

    “Specifically, posttraumatic stress symptoms, such as negative alterations in cognition, may cause or exacerbate existing negative beliefs about the self and body, contributing to overvaluation of eating, weight, and shape and their control, perfectionism, and low self-esteem (K. S. Mitchell, Scioli, et al., 2021; Trottier et al., 2016).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites K. S. Mitchell, Scioli, et al., 2021

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Trottier et al., 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Network studies have linked binge eating with irritability, cognitive restraint with reexperiencing symptoms, and depressed mood with overeating.

    “Quantitatively, network analyses have found associations between binge eating and irritability (Vanzhula et al., 2019), cognitive restraint and reexperiencing symptoms (Liebman et al., 2021), and depressed mood and overeating (Rodgers et al., 2019)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Vanzhula et al., 2019

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Liebman et al., 2021

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Rodgers et al., 2019

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Difficulty regulating emotions is linked to PTSD, and eating disorder behaviors may serve as poor emotion regulation tools.

    “Furthermore, emotion dysregulation, or difficulty regulating emotional responses, is a correlate of PTSD, and eating disorder behaviors can serve as maladaptive emotion regulation tools (K. S. Mitchell, Scioli, et al., 2021; Trottier et al., 2016).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites K. S. Mitchell, Scioli, et al., 2021

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Trottier et al., 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Some patients say they avoid foods that remind them of their assault.

    “For example, some patients report avoiding foods associated with their assault (Mott et al., 2012).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Mott et al., 2012

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    Quality was rated using the EPHPP tool, which covers six domains and yields global ratings of strong, moderate, or weak.

    “Study quality was assessed using the Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP) quality assessment tool for quantitative studies (Thomas et al., 2004).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Thomas et al., 2004

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Effective Public Health Practice Project, 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    Agreement between the two quality raters was almost perfect (κ = 0.96; 95% CI 0.92-1.00; p < .001).

    “Agreement was almost perfect between the two authors’ ratings, κ = 0.96 (95% CI: 0.92; 1.00), p < .001.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The review may overrepresent CBT outcomes and may not apply to other treatments.

    “Therefore, this review may be biased toward outcomes of cognitive behavioral therapy and may not generalize to other forms of treatment.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    A tentative pattern suggests PTSD patients gain similarly during treatment but relapse more afterward, opposite the review's hypothesis.

    “Tentatively, the pattern of results may indicate a similar pattern of results for individuals with trauma, such that individuals with PTSD achieve similar gains during treatment but experience greater symptom relapse in the follow-up period, contrary to this review’s hypothesis that individuals with PTSD would fare worse over the course of treatment.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    All studies measured trauma retrospectively, a method prone to bias toward more severe and recent abuse.

    “Trauma was also universally assessed using retrospective reports, which is subject to reporting bias toward more severe and recent abuse (Goodman et al., 2003; Williams, 1994).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Goodman et al., 2003

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Williams, 1994

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The studies differed greatly in their assessment of eating pathology and in which eating disorder diagnoses they included.

    “Further complicating the current findings, studies varied widely both in how eating pathology was assessed and the eating disorder diagnoses included.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The three dropout studies defined dropout or termination differently, making comparisons difficult.

    “Of note, the three studies examined used different definitions of treatment dropout or termination, hampering comparisons across studies.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The results are viewed as very tentative because few studies have examined PTSD.

    “Given the limited number of studies examining PTSD, results are considered very tentative”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The Ridley et al. (2009) result might reflect baseline eating pathology differences: exposed people start higher, change similarly, and keep a mean gap.

    “Therefore, the observed effect may be due to baseline differences in eating pathology between groups, meaning that individuals with childhood sexual abuse histories begin with higher pathology and demonstrate equivalent change over time compared to their unabused peers, but maintain the mean difference between groups.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The review looked only at eating disorder symptom outcomes.

    “Another consideration is that the current review only examined treatment outcomes in terms of eating disorder symptoms.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
39 of 39
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Posttraumatic and eating disorder symptoms have bidirectional functional associations.

    “Given the bidirectional, functional associations between posttraumatic and eating disorder symptoms”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    In eating disorder care, restoring weight is commonly given priority for underweight patients.

    “since weight restoration is often prioritized in eating disorder treatment if the patient is underweight”
2 of 2

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Trauma histories and PTSD symptoms predict more complicated courses of illness, higher dropout rates, and worse outcomes following treatment.

    “trauma histories and PTSD symptoms have been reported to predict more complicated courses of illness, higher dropout rates, and worse outcomes following treatment (11, 17–26).”

    From The integrated treatment of eating disorders, posttraumatic stress disorder, and psychiatric comorbidity: a commentary on the evolution of principles and guidelines (2023) · cites this paper as [19]

    The Results (Traumatic Events; page unavailable) report greater treatment dropout among patients with traumatic-event histories, and the Discussion says they may have greater symptom relapse after treatment. But the review found similar gains during treatment for trauma-exposed patients, while its Discussion describes the evidence for PTSD-related dropout and treatment outcomes as mixed or equivocal. It does not establish a generally more complicated illness course or consistently worse treatment outcomes for both groups. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Four of twelve studies is not less than one-third

    Minor

    The stated count of four is exactly one-third of twelve, not less than one-third.

  • Follow-up study list omits a study discussed immediately afterward

    Minor

    The list naming the eight follow-up studies contains only seven citations. The subsequent account treats Castellini et al. (2018), which is absent from that list, as a follow-up study.

  • PTSD follow-up summary overlooks a null finding

    Minor

    The discussion says both follow-up studies found an effect of PTSD, but the results also report a six-month follow-up study that found no association. The summary omits that contrary follow-up result.

3 of 3

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Effective Public Health Practice Project, 2010, Quality assessment tool for quantitative studies dictionary
  2. Garner D. M., 1991, Eating disorder inventory‐2: Professional manual
  3. Hicks A. A.(2016).Understanding correlates and comorbidities in the treatment and recovery of adolescent eating disorders[Doctoral dissertation]. Ohio State University.https://etd.ohiolink.edu/apexprod/rws_olink/r/1501/10?clear=10&p10_accession_num=osu1471864039
  4. Ridley A. M.(2009).Familial predictors of long‐term outcome following inpatient treatment for eating disorders[PhD dissertation]. Brigham Young University.https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/1752/
  5. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2014, SAMHSA's concept of trauma and guidance for a trauma‐informed approach

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Convertino, A. D., & Mendoza, R. R.
Affiliations
San Diego State University (US)
Corresponding author
Convertino, Alexandra D.
Venue
International Journal of Eating Disorders
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-03-14
Volume
56
Issue
6
Pages
1055-1074
ISSN
  • 0276-3478 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-108X
OpenAlex
W4324130224
Cited by
61
References
86
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 3
FWCI
3.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Eating Disorders (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (5T34GM008303)
  • National Science Foundation (1842470)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, eating disorders, trauma exposure, treatment discontinuation, symptom recurrence, treatment outcomes, trauma-informed care, integrated treatment
MeSH terms
Feeding and Eating Disorders, Humans, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-09-28.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-09-28.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review