Cited by 95Eating Disorders and BehaviorsPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

Eating disorders and posttraumatic stress disorder

Open access
Rijkers, Cleo, Schoorl, Maartje, van Hoeken, Daphne, Hoek, Hans W.·2019·Current Opinion in Psychiatry

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Childhood maltreatment is associated with all types of eating disorders. We provide a systematic review of the recent literature on comorbid posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in patients with eating disorders, and focus on prevalence, relationship with symptom severity, operating mechanisms and treatment. RECENT FINDINGS: The prevalence of comorbid PTSD in patients with eating disorders ranges from 9 to 24%, with research suggesting that comorbid PTSD is associated with more severe eating disorder symptoms. Maladaptive emotional regulation strategies may mediate the relationship between PTSD and eating disorders. Two pilot studies provide preliminary evidence that concurrent cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) for PTSD and eating disorders may be beneficial and that repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) could be helpful in the treatment of PTSD in some eating disorder patients. SUMMARY: PTSD is a common comorbidity in patients with eating disorders and impacts the severity of their eating disorder symptoms. However, there is little research into concurrent treatments for PTSD and eating disorders. Difficulties in emotional regulation may be a common mechanism in both disorders.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/yco.0000000000000545

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rijkers, C., Schoorl, M., van Hoeken, D., & Hoek, H. W.
Affiliations
  • Parnassia Groep (NL)
  • Leiden University (NL)
  • University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
Corresponding author
Rijkers, Cleo
Venue
Current Opinion in Psychiatry
Published
2019-11
Volume
32
Issue
6
Pages
510-517
ISSN
0951-7367 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2961409654
Cited by
95
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5
FWCI
0.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
eating disorders, post-traumatic stress disorder, comorbidities, child abuse, emotion regulation, cognitive behavioral therapy, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, symptom severity, treatment of comorbid disorders
MeSH terms
Adult, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Child, Child Abuse, Female, Humans, Male, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Comorbidity, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review