The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ecological role of vertebrate scavengers in urban ecosystems in the UK
Open accessAbstract
Recent research has demonstrated how scavenging, the act of consuming dead animals, plays a key role in ecosystem structure, functioning, and stability. A growing number of studies suggest that vertebrate scavengers also provide key ecosystem services, the benefits humans gain from the natural world, particularly in the removal of carcasses from the environment. An increasing proportion of the human population is now residing in cities and towns, many of which, despite being highly altered environments, contain significant wildlife populations, and so animal carcasses. Indeed, non‐predation fatalities may be higher within urban than natural environments. Despite this, the fate of carcasses in urban environments and the role vertebrate scavengers play in their removal have not been determined. In this study, we quantify the role of vertebrate scavengers in urban environments in three towns in the UK. Using experimentally deployed rat carcasses and rapid fire motion‐triggered cameras, we determined which species were scavenging and how removal of carcass biomass was partitioned between them. Of the 63 experimental carcasses deployed, vertebrate scavenger activity was detected at 67%. There was a significantly greater depletion in carcass biomass in the presence (mean loss of 194 g) than absence (mean loss of 14 g) of scavengers. Scavenger activity was restricted to three species, Carrion crows Corvus corone, Eurasian magpies Pica pica, and European red foxes Vulpes vulpes. From behavioral analysis, we estimated that a maximum of 73% of the carcass biomass was removed by vertebrate scavengers. Despite having low species richness, the urban scavenger community in our urban study system removed a similar proportion of carcasses to those reported in more pristine environments. Vertebrate scavengers are providing a key urban ecosystem service in terms of carcass removal. This service is, however, often overlooked, and the species that provide it are among some of the most disliked and persecuted.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Repetitive deposition of carcasses at a site changes the behaviour of vertebrate scavengers, as ecological studies have shown.
“However, repetitive deposition of carcasses at a site changes the behaviour of vertebrate scavengers, as ecological studies have shown [168,170 -172].”
From Forensic experiments on animal scavenging: A systematic literature review on what we have and what we need (2023) · cites this paper as [171]
The Field methods section says carcasses were deployed repeatedly at each site, and the Discussion reports a significant increase in scavenger activity over the experiment, particularly among crows. But the Discussion offers habituation to carcasses at a familiar spot only as a possible explanation; it also proposes a seasonal decline in microbial activity. The paper therefore does not establish that repetitive deposition caused the behavioural change. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2017) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v082.i13 · Cited by 24,346
Global forecasts of urban expansion to 2030 and direct impacts on biodiversity and carbon pools
Seto, K. C., Güneralp, B., & Hutyra, L. R. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1211658109 · Cited by 5,086
An Approximate Distribution of Estimates of Variance Components
Satterthwaite, F. E. (1946) · Biometrics Bulletin · doi:10.2307/3002019 · Cited by 4,373
Use of salmonid carcasses by vertebrate scavengers
Hewson, R. (1995) · Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.1995.tb05127.x · Cited by 27
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 63
- 10.1111/ele.12177 · DOI
- 10.1515/mamm.2005.009 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00442-012-2460-3 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2012.20353.x · DOI
- 10.1201/b18819-8 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0141505 · DOI
- 10.1139/z04-022 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.baae.2011.02.008 · DOI
- 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12378.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.11.025 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02732.x · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.29.1.207 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2008.00537.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2012.00289.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1557-9263.2012.00370.x · DOI
- 10.1016/0031-9384(86)90013-2 · DOI
- 10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[2403:EOSDNO]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.2307/1368878 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.06.004 · DOI
- 10.1038/srep29641 · DOI
- 10.1098/rsbl.2008.0038 · DOI
- 10.2193/2008-282 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-4615-1531-9_19 · DOI
- 10.1038/srep00753 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01835.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.04.020 · DOI
- 10.1006/anbe.1996.0008 · DOI
- 10.1111/ddi.12330 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11252-007-0045-4 · DOI
- 10.1093/biosci/biv101 · DOI
- 10.1093/biosci/biu034 · DOI
- 10.1111/oik.02222 · DOI
- 10.1111/brv.12097 · DOI
- 10.7589/2014-05-140 · DOI
- 10.1038/srep07811 · DOI
- Mundy P., 1992, The vultures of Africa
- 10.1111/j.2041-210x.2012.00261.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/416807a · DOI
- 10.1086/203648 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06293.x · DOI
- 10.1017/S0950268800051761 · DOI
- 10.1111/mam.12005 · DOI
- Putman R. J., 1983, Carrion and dung. The decomposition of animal wastes
- R Core Team, 2012, R: A language and environment for statistical computing
- 10.1080/00480169.2000.36188 · DOI
- Reed T. M., 1992, The role of avian carcasses in botulism epizootics, Wildlife Society Bulletin, 20, 175
- Reimchen T. E., 2002, Isotopic evidence for enrichment of salmon‐derived nutrients in vegetation, soil and insects in riparian zones in coastal British Columbia, American Fisheries Society Symposium Series, 34, 59
- 10.1038/nature04887 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jtbi.2004.02.005 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ecss.2015.02.002 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0099059 · DOI
- 10.1890/15-0212.1 · DOI
- 10.1111/ibi.12079 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0408049101 · DOI
- 10.1098/rspb.2006.0232 · DOI
- Sillero‐Zubiri C., 2004, Canids: Foxes, Wolves, Jackals and Dogs – 2004 Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan
- 10.5194/we-3-33-2002 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.09.006 · DOI
- Vass A. A., 2001, Beyond the grave—understanding human decomposition, Microbiology Today, 28, 190
- 10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00124-X · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1236077 · DOI
- 10.1525/auk.2011.10248 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tree.2010.12.011 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Indra, L., Lösch, S., Errickson, D., & Finaughty, D. (2023) · Forensic Science International · doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2023.111862 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Inger, R., Cox, D. T. C., Per, E., Norton, B. A., & Gaston, K. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Exeter (GB)
- Gazi University (TR)
- University of Sheffield (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Inger, Richard
- Venue
- Ecology and Evolution
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-09-09
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 7015-7023
- ISSN
- 2045-7758 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5513233
- OpenAlex
- W2508282229
- Cited by
- 74
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5
- FWCI
- 4.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Ecology and Evolution (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Open Research Exeter (University of Exeter) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
- University of Derby Online Research Archive. (University of Derby) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştirma Kurumu
- Natural Environment Research Council
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Forensic Entomology and Diptera Studies
- Keywords
- vertebrate scavengers, urban ecosystems, carcass removal, ecosystem services, carrion, Corvus corax, Eurasian magpie, red fox, scavenger communities, urban wildlife, scavenger behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review