Cited by 74Wildlife Ecology and ConservationAnimal Ecology and Behavior StudiesForensic Entomology and Diptera Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ecological role of vertebrate scavengers in urban ecosystems in the UK

Open access

Abstract

Recent research has demonstrated how scavenging, the act of consuming dead animals, plays a key role in ecosystem structure, functioning, and stability. A growing number of studies suggest that vertebrate scavengers also provide key ecosystem services, the benefits humans gain from the natural world, particularly in the removal of carcasses from the environment. An increasing proportion of the human population is now residing in cities and towns, many of which, despite being highly altered environments, contain significant wildlife populations, and so animal carcasses. Indeed, non‐predation fatalities may be higher within urban than natural environments. Despite this, the fate of carcasses in urban environments and the role vertebrate scavengers play in their removal have not been determined. In this study, we quantify the role of vertebrate scavengers in urban environments in three towns in the UK. Using experimentally deployed rat carcasses and rapid fire motion‐triggered cameras, we determined which species were scavenging and how removal of carcass biomass was partitioned between them. Of the 63 experimental carcasses deployed, vertebrate scavenger activity was detected at 67%. There was a significantly greater depletion in carcass biomass in the presence (mean loss of 194 g) than absence (mean loss of 14 g) of scavengers. Scavenger activity was restricted to three species, Carrion crows Corvus corone, Eurasian magpies Pica pica, and European red foxes Vulpes vulpes. From behavioral analysis, we estimated that a maximum of 73% of the carcass biomass was removed by vertebrate scavengers. Despite having low species richness, the urban scavenger community in our urban study system removed a similar proportion of carcasses to those reported in more pristine environments. Vertebrate scavengers are providing a key urban ecosystem service in terms of carcass removal. This service is, however, often overlooked, and the species that provide it are among some of the most disliked and persecuted.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ece3.2414

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Repetitive deposition of carcasses at a site changes the behaviour of vertebrate scavengers, as ecological studies have shown.

    “However, repetitive deposition of carcasses at a site changes the behaviour of vertebrate scavengers, as ecological studies have shown [168,170 -172].”

    From Forensic experiments on animal scavenging: A systematic literature review on what we have and what we need (2023) · cites this paper as [171]

    The Field methods section says carcasses were deployed repeatedly at each site, and the Discussion reports a significant increase in scavenger activity over the experiment, particularly among crows. But the Discussion offers habituation to carcasses at a familiar spot only as a possible explanation; it also proposes a seasonal decline in microbial activity. The paper therefore does not establish that repetitive deposition caused the behavioural change. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 63

  1. 10.1111/ele.12177 · DOI
  2. 10.1515/mamm.2005.009 · DOI
  3. 10.1007/s00442-012-2460-3 · DOI
  4. 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2012.20353.x · DOI
  5. 10.1201/b18819-8 · DOI
  6. 10.1371/journal.pone.0141505 · DOI
  7. 10.1139/z04-022 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.baae.2011.02.008 · DOI
  9. 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12378.x · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.11.025 · DOI
  11. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02732.x · DOI
  12. 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.29.1.207 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2008.00537.x · DOI
  14. 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2012.00289.x · DOI
  15. 10.1111/j.1557-9263.2012.00370.x · DOI
  16. 10.1016/0031-9384(86)90013-2 · DOI
  17. 10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[2403:EOSDNO]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  18. 10.2307/1368878 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.06.004 · DOI
  20. 10.1038/srep29641 · DOI
  21. 10.1098/rsbl.2008.0038 · DOI
  22. 10.2193/2008-282 · DOI
  23. 10.1007/978-1-4615-1531-9_19 · DOI
  24. 10.1038/srep00753 · DOI
  25. 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01835.x · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.04.020 · DOI
  27. 10.1006/anbe.1996.0008 · DOI
  28. 10.1111/ddi.12330 · DOI
  29. 10.1007/s11252-007-0045-4 · DOI
  30. 10.1093/biosci/biv101 · DOI
  31. 10.1093/biosci/biu034 · DOI
  32. 10.1111/oik.02222 · DOI
  33. 10.1111/brv.12097 · DOI
  34. 10.7589/2014-05-140 · DOI
  35. 10.1038/srep07811 · DOI
  36. Mundy P., 1992, The vultures of Africa
  37. 10.1111/j.2041-210x.2012.00261.x · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1038/416807a · DOI
  39. 10.1086/203648 · DOI
  40. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06293.x · DOI
  41. 10.1017/S0950268800051761 · DOI
  42. 10.1111/mam.12005 · DOI
  43. Putman R. J., 1983, Carrion and dung. The decomposition of animal wastes
  44. R Core Team, 2012, R: A language and environment for statistical computing
  45. 10.1080/00480169.2000.36188 · DOI
  46. Reed T. M., 1992, The role of avian carcasses in botulism epizootics, Wildlife Society Bulletin, 20, 175
  47. Reimchen T. E., 2002, Isotopic evidence for enrichment of salmon‐derived nutrients in vegetation, soil and insects in riparian zones in coastal British Columbia, American Fisheries Society Symposium Series, 34, 59
  48. 10.1038/nature04887 · DOI
  49. 10.1016/j.jtbi.2004.02.005 · DOI
  50. 10.1016/j.ecss.2015.02.002 · DOI
  51. 10.1371/journal.pone.0099059 · DOI
  52. 10.1890/15-0212.1 · DOI
  53. 10.1111/ibi.12079 · DOI
  54. 10.1073/pnas.0408049101 · DOI
  55. 10.1098/rspb.2006.0232 · DOI
  56. Sillero‐Zubiri C., 2004, Canids: Foxes, Wolves, Jackals and Dogs – 2004 Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan
  57. 10.5194/we-3-33-2002 · DOI · Paper page
  58. 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.09.006 · DOI
  59. Vass A. A., 2001, Beyond the grave—understanding human decomposition, Microbiology Today, 28, 190
  60. 10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00124-X · DOI
  61. 10.1126/science.1236077 · DOI
  62. 10.1525/auk.2011.10248 · DOI
  63. 10.1016/j.tree.2010.12.011 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Inger, R., Cox, D. T. C., Per, E., Norton, B. A., & Gaston, K. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Exeter (GB)
  • Gazi University (TR)
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
Corresponding author
Inger, Richard
Venue
Ecology and Evolution
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-09-09
Volume
6
Issue
19
Pages
7015-7023
ISSN
2045-7758 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2508282229
Cited by
74
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5
FWCI
4.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Ecology and Evolution (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Open Research Exeter (University of Exeter) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • University of Derby Online Research Archive. (University of Derby) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştirma Kurumu
  • Natural Environment Research Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Forensic Entomology and Diptera Studies
Keywords
vertebrate scavengers, urban ecosystems, carcass removal, ecosystem services, carrion, Corvus corax, Eurasian magpie, red fox, scavenger communities, urban wildlife, scavenger behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review