Cited by 79Evolution and Genetic DynamicsAnimal Behavior and ReproductionMorphological variations and asymmetry

The geometry of the P areto front in biological phenotype space

Open access
Sheftel, Hila, Shoval, Oren, Mayo, Avi, Alon, Uri·2013·Ecology and Evolution

Abstract

When organisms perform a single task, selection leads to phenotypes that maximize performance at that task. When organisms need to perform multiple tasks, a trade‐off arises because no phenotype can optimize all tasks. Recent work addressed this question, and assumed that the performance at each task decays with distance in trait space from the best phenotype at that task. Under this assumption, the best‐fitness solutions (termed the P areto front) lie on simple low‐dimensional shapes in trait space: line segments, triangles and other polygons. The vertices of these polygons are specialists at a single task. Here, we generalize this finding, by considering performance functions of general form, not necessarily functions that decay monotonically with distance from their peak. We find that, except for performance functions with highly eccentric contours, simple shapes in phenotype space are still found, but with mildly curving edges instead of straight ones. In a wide range of systems, complex data on multiple quantitative traits, which might be expected to fill a high‐dimensional phenotype space, is predicted instead to collapse onto low‐dimensional shapes; phenotypes near the vertices of these shapes are predicted to be specialists, and can thus suggest which tasks may be at play.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ece3.528

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Bulk profiles of cells synchronized for the cell cycle are challenging to perform and compare across cells and species.

    “while bulk profiles of cells synchronized for the cell cycle have proven challenging to perform and compare across cells and species134”
  • Bulk genomic assays of a continuous dynamic process require breaking the process into discrete time points and synchronizing the cell population.

    “Studying a continuous dynamic process through bulk genomic assays requires to artificially break and measure the process at discrete time points, and also to synchronize the population of cells.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sheftel, H., Shoval, O., Mayo, A., & Alon, U.
Affiliations
Weizmann Institute of Science (IL)
Corresponding author
Alon, Uri
Venue
Ecology and Evolution
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-04-17
Volume
3
Issue
6
Pages
1471-1483
ISSN
2045-7758 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2042859590
Cited by
79
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1
FWCI
3.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Ecology and Evolution (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • European Commission (2007–2013, FP7 2007-2013, FP7/2007)
  • Israel Science Foundation (FP7/2007-2013, isf-67509)
  • FP7 Ideas: European Research Council (249919)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Morphological variations and asymmetry
Keywords
Pareto front, phenotype space, trade-offs, multiple tasks, limit state function, trait space, specialists, quantitative traits

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review