Cited by 99

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Uncoupling between intravascular and distending pressures leads to underestimation of circulatory congestion in obesity

Obokata, Masaru, Reddy, Yogesh N.V., Melenovsky, Vojtech, Sorimachi, Hidemi, Jarolim, Petr, Borlaug, Barry A.·2022·European Journal of Heart Failure

Abstract

Aims: Patients with obesity frequently present with dyspnoea. Biomarkers that reflect wall stress are often used to evaluate circulatory congestion and help determine whether dyspnoea is of cardiac causes. Patients with obesity display greater external restraint on the heart, which may alter relationships between intravascular pressures and stress markers. Methods and results: Subjects with unexplained dyspnoea ( n = 212) underwent cardiac catheterization with simultaneous echocardiography. Blood sampling was performed in a subset ( n = 58). Relationships between echocardiographic and blood biomarkers of circulatory congestion and directly‐measured haemodynamics were compared between participants with severe obesity [body mass index (BMI) ≥35 kg/m 2 , Group B) and those without (BMI <35 kg/m 2 , Group A). Circulatory congestion was assessed by pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP), and vascular distending pressure was assessed by left ventricular transmural pressure (LVTMP). As compared to Group A, participants in Group B displayed higher PCWP relative to N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide, mid‐regional pro‐atrial natriuretic peptide, troponin T, and growth differentiation factor‐15 (all p < 0.01). In contrast, the relationships between LVTMP and the biomarkers were superimposable. Echocardiographic biomarkers revealed the same pattern: PCWP was higher for any E/e′ ratio in Group B compared to Group A, but the relationship between LVTMP and E/e′ was similar. In contrast, levels of C‐terminal pro‐endothelin‐1 and mid‐regional pro‐adrenomedullin were more robustly correlated with PCWP (r = 0.67 and r = 0.62, both p < 0.0001), with no differential relationship based upon BMI. Conclusions: Non‐invasive haemodynamic markers underestimate circulatory congestion in patients with obesity, an effect that appears related to uncoupling between cardiac wall stress and intravascular pressures. This may lead to systematic under‐recognition of congestion in patients with obesity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ejhf.2377

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. 10.1183/16000617.0081-2016 · DOI
  2. 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.5321 · DOI
  3. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.026807 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.034646 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.mayocp.2018.11.037 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.09.1111 · DOI
  7. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa823 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1002/ejhf.1494 · DOI
  9. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz641 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.11.030 · DOI
  11. 10.1007/s10741-011-9249-z · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.03.042 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.10.040 · DOI
  14. 10.1038/ijo.2010.227 · DOI
  15. 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.3702 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.01.058 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.12.034 · DOI
  18. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw241 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.04.039 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.045409 · DOI
  21. 10.1161/01.CIR.73.3.428 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.jchf.2019.03.021 · DOI
  23. 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.115.002978 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.echo.2021.05.009 · DOI
  25. 10.1183/13993003.01617-2019 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.11.066 · DOI
  27. 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000490 · DOI
  28. 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.115.002161 · DOI
  29. 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.110.960575 · DOI
  30. 10.1002/ejhf.1220 · DOI
  31. 10.1002/ejhf.2156 · DOI
  32. 10.1002/ejhf.1956 · DOI
  33. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.036006 · DOI
  34. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa823 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz626 · DOI
  36. 10.1002/ejhf.1366 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Obokata, M., Reddy, Y. N. V., Melenovsky, V., Sorimachi, H., Jarolim, P., & Borlaug, B. A.
Affiliations
  • Department of Cardiovascular Diseases Mayo Clinic Rochester MN USA
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital Harvard Medical School Boston MA USA
Venue
European Journal of Heart Failure
Published
2021-11-21
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
353-361
ISSN
  • 1388-9842
  • 1879-0844
Cited by
99
References
7
Language
en
Funders
  • Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (RO1 HL128526)
  • Fukuda Foundation for Medical Technology (N/A)
  • Japanese Circulation Society
  • Mochida Memorial Foundation for Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
  • Nippon Shinyaku
  • Takeda Science Foundation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review