The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Universally immunogenic T cell epitopes: promiscuous binding to human MHC class II and promiscuous recognition by T cells
Abstract
To understand the effect of human MHC class II polymorphism on antigen recognition, we analyzed the memory T cell response to three tetanus toxin epitopes defined by three short synthetic peptides (p2, p4 and p30). We found that p2 and p30 are universally immunogenic, since they are recognized by all primed donors, irrespective of their MHC haplotypes. The analysis of specific clones indicates that both peptides are very promiscuous in their capacity to bind to class II. p30 can be recognized in association with DRw11(5), 7, 9 and with DPw2 and DPw4, while p2 can be recognized in association with DR1, DRw15(2), DRw18 (3), DR4Dw4, DRw11(5), DRw13(w6), DR7, DRw8, DR9, DRw52a and DRw52b. On the contrary, the third peptide, p4, can be recognized by only half of the donors in association with only DRw52a and DRw52c. Analysis of truncated peptides shows that p30 contains three distinct epitopes, each recognized in association with different class II molecules. Therefore, the restriction specificity is already set at the level of the peptide‐MHC complex and, in all cases, T cells discriminate p30 bound to different class II molecules. On the contrary, p2 contains only one epitope, which is recognized in association with all DR molecules. In this case we found two different restriction patterns. Some clones are monogamous, since they recognize the peptide in association with one DR allele, while others are promiscuous, since they recognize the peptide in association with several different DR molecules. Thus, in this case, the restriction specificity is also set at the level of the T cell receptor. We suggest that both the promiscuous binding of peptides and the promiscuous recognition by T cells are dependent on the particular structure of the DR molecules, having a monomorphic α chain associated with a polymorphic β chain.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Dominance and Crypticity of T Cell Antigenic Determinants
Sercarz, E. (1993) · Annual Review of Immunology · doi:10.1146/annurev.immunol.11.1.729 · Cited by 855
Daniel, D., & Wegmann, D. R. (1996) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.93.2.956 · Cited by 406
SARS-CoV-2 human T cell epitopes: Adaptive immune response against COVID-19
Grifoni, A., Sidney, J., Vita, R., Peters, B., Crotty, S., Weiskopf, D., & Sette, A. (2021) · Cell Host & Microbe · doi:10.1016/j.chom.2021.05.010 · Cited by 314
Peptides for Vaccine Development
Hamley, I. W. (2022) · ACS Applied Bio Materials · doi:10.1021/acsabm.1c01238 · Cited by 104
Ehrhardt, G. R. A., Leslie, K. B., Lee, F., Wieler, J. S., & Schrader, J. W. (1999) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood.v94.7.2433.419k31_2433_2444 · Cited by 54
Metadata
- Authors
- Panina‐Bordignon, P., Tan, A., Termijtelen, A., Demotz, S., Corradin, G., & Lanzavecchia, A.
- Venue
- European Journal of Immunology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1989-12
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2237-2242
- ISSN
- 0014-2980 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-4141
- OpenAlex
- W2150756957
- Cited by
- 713
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Universally immunogenic T cell epitopes: promiscuous binding to human MHC class II and promiscuous recognition by T cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/eji.1830191209
- The paper
- Panina‐Bordignon, P., Tan, A., Termijtelen, A., Demotz, S., Corradin, G., & Lanzavecchia, A. (1989). Universally immunogenic T cell epitopes: promiscuous binding to human MHC class II and promiscuous recognition by T cells. European Journal of Immunology. https://doi.org/10.1002/eji.1830191209
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.