Cited by 31Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPain Management and TreatmentAcupuncture Treatment Research Studies

Transcutaneous electrical stimulation in neck pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Rampazo, Érika Patrícia, Martignago, Cintia Cristina Santi, de Noronha, Marcos, Liebano, Richard Eloin·2022·European Journal of Pain

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The objective of this systematic review was to investigate the effectiveness of electrical stimulation (ES) for neck pain (NP). DATABASES AND DATA TREATMENT: The databases CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE (via OVID), PEDro and Web of Science were searched, with no date restrictions. Two independent reviewers selected randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting pain, range of motion or psychosocial factors in people with NP, in which ES was applied. Methodological quality was assessed using the PEDro scale. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) was used to evaluate the quality of evidence. Thirty studies met eligibility criteria. RESULTS: Main results showed evidence of moderate quality that ES combined with other intervention significantly decreases the pain intensity compared to other intervention immediately post-treatment and at short-term follow-up; evidence of low quality showed significant effects of ES combined with other intervention in decreasing neck disability compared to other intervention immediately post-treatment; evidence of very-low quality that ES increased the pressure pain threshold compared to placebo immediately post-treatment and that ES + other intervention also increased the pressure pain threshold compared to other intervention at short-term follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: ES combined with other intervention seems to be useful to relieve pain and to improve disability in people with NP, however, more studies are needed. SIGNIFICANCE: Electrical stimulation seems to be effective for improving pain intensity, immediately post-treatment in people with neck pain, mainly as an adjunct therapeutic modality. Nevertheless, high-quality RCTs are still needed to investigate the efficacy of electrical stimulation in neck pain.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ejp.1845

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rampazo, É. P., Martignago, C. C. S., de Noronha, M., & Liebano, R. E.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Federal de São Carlos (BR)
  • Rural Department of Allied Health La Trobe Rural Health School La Trobe University Bendigo Australia
Venue
European Journal of Pain
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-08-03
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
18-42
ISSN
  • 1090-3801 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2149
OpenAlex
W3184601551
Cited by
31
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4
FWCI
0.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies
Keywords
transcutaneous electrical stimulation, neck pain, pain intensity, neck disability, pressure pain threshold, range of motion, adjunctive therapy, analgesia
MeSH terms
Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation, Humans, Neck, Pain Measurement, Range of Motion, Articular, Neck Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review