The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The burden of benevolent sexism: how it contributes to the maintenance of gender inequalities
Abstract
This study (N = 235) examines the responses of male and female participants to information about the alleged endorsement of either hostile or benevolent sexist beliefs by a sample of either men or women. We predicted that people endorsing benevolent sexist statements would be less likely to be perceived as sexist than those endorsing hostile sexist views, and examined the judgmental process through which people fail to recognize benevolent sexism as a form of prejudice. We argue that benevolent sexists do not match the mental prototype of sexist perpetrators, because they are seen as likeable. Our results confirm that because benevolent sexists are evaluated more positively than hostile sexists, they are less likely to be seen as sexists. This judgmental process occurs relatively independently of emotional responses to hostile vs. benevolent sexism. These results are discussed in terms of their relevance to the maintenance of gender inequalities. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Social psychology of intergroup relations
Tajfel, H. (1982) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.33.020182.000245 · Cited by 7,949
Sexism and racism: Old-fashioned and modern prejudices
Swim, J. K., Aikin, K. J., Hall, W. S., & Hunter, B. A. (1995) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.68.2.199 · Cited by 1,486
Gender Stereotypes and Attitudes Toward Women and Men
Eagly, A. H., & Mladinic, A. (1989) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167289154008 · Cited by 785
Schmitt, M. T., & Branscombe, N. R. (2002) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/14792772143000058 · Cited by 532
Cited by
Preacher, K. J., & Kelley, K. (2011) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/a0022658 · Cited by 3,060
Statistical properties of four effect-size measures for mediation models
Miočević, M., O’Rourke, H. P., MacKinnon, D. P., & Brown, H. C. (2018) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-017-0870-1 · Cited by 200
The Effect of Sexism and Rape Myths on Victim Blame’,
Rollero, C., & Tartaglia, S. (2019) · Sexuality & Culture · doi:10.1007/s12119-018-9549-8 · Cited by 78
Ahmad, M., & Shah, S. K. (2019) · International and Multidisciplinary Journal of Social Sciences · doi:10.17583/rimcis.2019.3989 · Cited by 73
The Language of Social Inequality
Augoustinos, M., & Callaghan, P. (2019) · The Social Psychology of Inequality · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-28856-3_20 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Barreto, M., & Ellemers, N.
- Venue
- European Journal of Social Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-09
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 633-642
- ISSN
- 0046-2772 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-0992
- OpenAlex
- W2070952776
- Cited by
- 468
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 15.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
