Cited by 247Behavioral Health and InterventionsMedia Influence and HealthNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

When planning is not enough: fighting unhealthy snacking habits by mental contrasting with implementation intentions (MCII)

Adriaanse, Marieke A., Oettingen, Gabriele, Gollwitzer, Peter M., Hennes, Erin P., de Ridder, Denise T. D., de Wit, John B. F.·2010·European Journal of Social Psychology

Abstract

In two experiments a self‐regulatory strategy combining mental contrasting with the formation of implementation intentions (MCII) was tested for its effectiveness in diminishing unhealthy snacking habits. Study 1 (N = 51) showed that participants in the MCII condition consumed fewer unhealthy snacks than participants in a control condition who thought about and listed healthy options for snacks. In Study 2 (N = 59) MCII was more effective than mental contrasting or formulating implementation intentions alone and mental contrasting was found to increase perceived clarity about critical cues for unhealthy snacking. Together, these findings suggest that MCII is an effective strategy for fighting habits and that one of the underlying processes making MCII superior to implementation intentions alone may be that mental contrasting produces clarity about the critical cues for the unwanted habitual behavior. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ejsp.730

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Combining mental contrasting with implementation intentions is more effective in goal pursuit than either mental contrasting or implementation intentions.

    “Both laboratory experiments and field studies have shown that combining mental contrasting with implementation intentions is more effective in goal pursuit than either mental contrasting or implementation intentions (Adriaanse et al., 2010; Kirk et al., 2013).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Adriaanse, M. A., Oettingen, G., Gollwitzer, P. M., Hennes, E. P., de Ridder, D. T. D., & de Wit, J. B. F.
Affiliations
  • Utrecht University (NL)
  • Universität Hamburg (DE)
  • University of Konstanz (DE)
  • New York University (US)
Corresponding author
Adriaanse, Marieke A.
Venue
European Journal of Social Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-11-24
Volume
40
Issue
7
Pages
1277-1293
ISSN
  • 0046-2772 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0992
OpenAlex
W2157568931
Cited by
247
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 11
FWCI
17.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
European Journal of Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
mental contrasting with implementation intentions, unhealthy snacking, self-regulation, habit change, implementation intentions, mental contrasting, dietary habits

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review