A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Mental Contrasting With Implementation Intentions on Goal Attainment
Open accessAbstract
Mental contrasting with implementation intentions (MCII) is a self-regulation strategy that enhances goal attainment. This meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy of MCII for goal attainment and explored potential moderators. A total of 21 empirical studies with 24 independent effect sizes (15,907 participants) were included in the analysis. Results showed that MCII to be effective for goal attainment with a small to medium effect size (g = 0.336). The effect was mainly moderated by intervention style. Specifically, studies with interventions based on interactions between participants and experimenters (g = 0.465) had stronger effects than studies with interventions based on interactions between participants and documents (g = 0.277). The results revealed that MCII is a brief and effective strategy for goal attainment with a small to moderate effect; however, because of some publication bias, the actual effect sizes may be smaller. Due to small number of studies in this meta-analysis, additional studies are needed to determine the role of moderator variables.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This meta-analysis found that mental contrasting with implementation intentions (MCII) improves goal attainment with a small-to-medium effect. Intervention style moderated the effect, with experimenter-led MCII outperforming document-based MCII.
Key findings
- Across 21 articles and 24 independent effect sizes (15,907 participants), MCII had a significant small-to-medium effect on goal attainment: Hedges’ g = 0.336, 95% CI (0.229, 0.443), under a random-effects model with significant medium heterogeneity [Q(23) = 56.540, I² = 59.321%, p < 0.001].
- Intervention type was the only significant moderator: experimenter interventions had a larger effect (g = 0.465) than document interventions [g = 0.277; Q(1) = 4.797, p < 0.05].
- Publication status, sample age, goal domain, dependent measure, and expectation level did not significantly moderate the effect.
- Publication bias analyses were mixed: the funnel plot showed asymmetry and Egger’s test was significant (t = 5.46, p < 0.01), while fail-safe N was 482 versus a critical value of 130; trim-and-fill adjusted the effect to g = 0.242, 95% CI (0.143, 0.342).
Methods
- Systematic search of English and Chinese databases for empirical field intervention studies on MCII, excluding laboratory-only experiments and requiring data sufficient to calculate effect sizes and an MCII versus control comparison.
- Included 24 independent studies from 21 articles, total N = 15,907; coded publication status, sample age, goal domain, intervention type, dependent measure, and goal success expectation.
- Used Hedges’ g as the effect size, random-effects meta-analysis, heterogeneity tests (Q and I²), moderator analyses, and publication bias analyses (funnel plot, Rosenthal’s fail-safe N, Egger regression, trim-and-fill).
Limitations
- Stated: the number of studies was small, which may explain why several moderators were not significant; the authors also excluded Kizilcec and Cohen (2017) from moderator analyses because its large sample would dominate subgroups, potentially making moderator results unreliable.
- Stated: only nine studies reported expectations of success, and expectation variance was small, limiting conclusions about expectation as a moderator.
- Evident from the text: publication bias analyses indicated possible missing small or null effects, so the actual effect size may be smaller than the unadjusted estimate; moderator variables also covaried across studies, and more MCII intervention studies are needed.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
6 of 29 cited sources checked · 6 supported · 0 flagged
- Study design and conductreasoning§ Limitations · p. 8
In the moderator analysis, Kizilcec and Cohen (2017) was excluded because of the large sample size in their study, which might render the results of moderator effect unreliable.
“Moreover, in the moderator analysis, we excluded Kizilcec and Cohen (2017) because of the large sample size in their study, which might render the results of moderator effect unreliable.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Kizilcec and Cohen (2017) source
- Findingown data§ Moderator Analysis · p. 5
There was no significant difference between MCII effects on self-reported and objective outcomes.
“For the dependent measures, there was no significant difference between the effect of MCII interventions on selfreported results and the effect of MCII interventions on objective results.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ Moderator Analysis · p. 5
Sample age did not significantly moderate the effect of MCII.
“The moderator analysis found no significant moderating effect of sample age on MCII, indicating that the strategy was effective for individuals of different ages.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ [A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Mental Contrasting With Implementation Intentions on Goal Attainment](https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.565202/full) · p. 1
MCII intervention has a small-to-medium significant effect on goal attainment (g = 0.336, 95% CI 0.229, 0.443) based on 24 independent studies (N = 15,907).
“Results showed that MCII to be effective for goal attainment with a small to medium effect size (g = 0.336).”
- Also stated in: § Main Effect · p. 4 · plain
“Overall, MCII yielded a small to medium significant effect size, g = 0.336, 95% CI (0.229, 0.443).”
- Also stated in: § Intervention Effect of MCII on Goal Attainment · p. 5 · plain
“This research evaluated the effect of MCII on goal attainment, using 24 independent studies from 21 articles, with a total effect size of small to medium, g = 0.336.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Main Effect · p. 4 · plain
- Findingown data§ Publication Bias Analysis · p. 4
The funnel plot showed strong asymmetry, indicating possible publication bias from missing studies with nonsignificant or small effects.
“The funnel plot of the effect of MCII on goal attainment showed strong asymmetry (see Figure 2 ), with more studies on the right side than on the left, indicating that some studies with nonsignificant results or small effect sizes may have been missing from the left side, which could indicate publication bias.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Findingown data§ Moderator Analysis · p. 5
There was no significant difference in effect size between published papers and unpublished master's theses and doctoral dissertations.
“The results ( Table 2 ) showed no significant differences in effect size between published papers and unpublished master's theses and doctoral dissertations, further indicating a low possibility of publication bias.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Studies with significant results are easier to publish, so published articles might overestimate the effect of MCII.
- Findingown data§ Main Effect · p. 4
The meta-analysis included 24 independent studies from 21 articles (N = 15,907).
“The model included 24 independent studies from 21 articles ( N = 15,907).”
- Also stated in: § Literature Search and Criteria for Inclusion · p. 4 · plain
“Finally, 24 independent studies from 21 articles were included.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Literature Search and Criteria for Inclusion · p. 4 · plain
- Findingown data§ Main Effect · p. 4
Significant medium heterogeneity was present among studies [Q(23) = 56.540, I2 = 59.321%, p < 0.001].
“Due to the significant medium level of heterogeneity [ Q (23) = 56.540, I 2 = 59.321%, p < 0.001], we used the random-effects model.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Moderators of the Effect of MCII on Goal Attainment · p. 8
There was no significant moderating effect of sample age on the effect of MCII.
“In addition, the effect size did not vary with sample age, goal domain, or dependent measures, revealing that MCII was effective for people of different ages, for goal pursuit in different domains, and for different measures of behavior change.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Moderators of the Effect of MCII on Goal Attainment · p. 8
There was no significant moderating effect of expectation level on the effect of MCII.
“We did not find a moderating effect for expectation level in this study, due to the ceiling effect and low variance of expectation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Intervention Effect of MCII on Goal Attainment · p. 6
The effect size of MCII interventions was similar to interventions employing either mental contrasting or implementation intentions.
“Although we found that effect size of MCII interventions was similar to interventions employing either mental contrasting or implementation intentions, we recommend using MCII as mental contrasting and implementation intention complement each other (Kappes et al., 2012b, 2013; Oettingen, 2012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Moderators of the Effect of MCII on Goal Attainment · p. 6
Of the six potential moderators examined (publication status, sample age, goal domain, type of intervention, dependent measure, and goal success expectation), only intervention type was a significant moderator of the MCII effect.
“The current meta-analysis examined six potential moderating variables: publication status, sample age, goal domain, type of intervention, dependent measure, and goal success expectation. Of these, only intervention type was found to be a significant moderator.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Moderators of the Effect of MCII on Goal Attainment · p. 8
Document-based MCII interventions had a small to medium effect size on behavior change (g = 0.277).
“cost-saving document-based interventions (such as online interventions) had a small to medium effect size on behavior change ( g = 0.277)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Moderators of the Effect of MCII on Goal Attainment · p. 8
There was no significant moderating effect of dependent measure on the effect of MCII.
“In addition, the effect size did not vary with sample age, goal domain, or dependent measures, revealing that MCII was effective for people of different ages, for goal pursuit in different domains, and for different measures of behavior change.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Moderators of the Effect of MCII on Goal Attainment · p. 8
There was no significant moderating effect of goal domain on the effect of MCII.
“In addition, the effect size did not vary with sample age, goal domain, or dependent measures, revealing that MCII was effective for people of different ages, for goal pursuit in different domains, and for different measures of behavior change.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ Moderators of the Effect of MCII on Goal Attainment · p. 8
Participants' expectations of success in the existing studies were all above 4 points on a 7-point scale.
“participants' expectations of success in the existing studies were all above 4 points (7 points), which was above the average level.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ Moderators of the Effect of MCII on Goal Attainment · p. 7
Intervention type significantly moderates the effect of MCII on goal attainment: experimenter interventions had a significantly higher effect size than document interventions.
“MCII interventions based on experimenter interventions had a significantly higher effect size than document interventions.”
- Also stated in: § CONCLUSIONS · p. 9 · hedged
“(2) the effect of MCII may be moderated by intervention type, and more studies are needed to strengthen the case for the efficacy of moderator variables.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § CONCLUSIONS · p. 9 · hedged
- Findingown data§ Moderators of the Effect of MCII on Goal Attainment · p. 8
Only nine studies reported expectations of success.
“only nine studies reported expectations of success in their study”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ Moderators of the Effect of MCII on Goal Attainment · p. 8
The variance in expectation was small.
“the variance in expectation was small”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ Moderator Analysis · p. 5
MCII was effective for individuals of different ages.
“The moderator analysis found no significant moderating effect of sample age on MCII, indicating that the strategy was effective for individuals of different ages.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ [A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Mental Contrasting With Implementation Intentions on Goal Attainment](https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.565202/full) · p. 1
Because of some publication bias, the actual effect sizes may be smaller than the estimated effect.
“however, because of some publication bias, the actual effect sizes may be smaller.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ Intervention Effect of MCII on Goal Attainment · p. 5
The effect of MCII on goal attainment is similar to Cross and Sheffield's (2019) meta-analysis finding of a small-to-medium effect on health behavior change.
“This is similar to Cross and Sheffield's (2019) meta-analysis, which found that MCII had a small-to-medium effect on health behavior change.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cross and Sheffield's (2019) source
- Premisecitation§ Expectations of Success · p. 3
Expectations of success moderate the effect of mental contrasting on goal pursuit.
“Expectations of success, perceived likelihood of attaining the desired outcome (i.e., general expectations, usually measured by 'how likely do you think it is that you will attain your goal?') moderate the effect of mental contrasting on goal pursuit (Oettingen, 2000; Oettingen et al., 2001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation§ Implementation Intention and Its Effects on Goal Attainment · p. 2
Implementation intentions have a small to large effect on behavior change.
“In total, implementation intentions have a small to large effect on behavior change.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ The Effect of Mental Contrasting With Implementation Intentions on Goal Attainment · p. 2
Combining mental contrasting with implementation intentions is more effective in goal pursuit than either mental contrasting or implementation intentions.
“Both laboratory experiments and field studies have shown that combining mental contrasting with implementation intentions is more effective in goal pursuit than either mental contrasting or implementation intentions (Adriaanse et al., 2010; Kirk et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation§ The Effect of Mental Contrasting With Implementation Intentions on Goal Attainment · p. 2
Most MCII intervention studies have shown that it can improve goal attainment.
“MCII intervention studies increased in recent years, and most studies have shown that it can improve goal attainment (e.g., Stadler et al., 2009, 2010).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Stadler et al., 2009, 2010
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Study design and conductnone given§ Limitations · p. 8
The number of studies involved in this meta-analysis was small.
“The number of studies involved in this meta-analysis was small.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductcitation§ Moderators of the Effect of MCII on Goal Attainment · p. 8
The results of moderator analysis should be interpreted with caution due to the small number of studies included in the meta-analysis and covarying moderator variables across studies.
“The results of moderator analysis should be interpreted with caution due to the small number of studies included in the meta-analysis and covarying moderator variables across studies (Lipsey, 2003), which may cause misleading results in analyses focusing on single moderator variables.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lipsey, 2003 source
- Interpretationreasoning§ Moderators of the Effect of MCII on Goal Attainment · p. 8
The studies included in this meta-analysis guaranteed that participants had relatively high success expectations in each study.
“Therefore, the studies included in this meta-analysis guaranteed that the participants had relatively high success expectations in each study.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- May combine two claims. 25
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 4
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ The Effect of Mental Contrasting With Implementation Intentions on Goal Attainment · p. 2Wittleder et al. (2019) found MCII decreased the number of drinking days for people with hazardous drinking behavior but not for people with non-hazardous drinking behavior, compared to control.
“Wittleder et al. (2019) found that MCII decreased the number of drinking days for people with hazardous drinking behavior, but not for people with non-hazardous drinking behavior, compared to the control group.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Wittleder et al. (2019) source
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ The Effect of Mental Contrasting With Implementation Intentions on Goal Attainment · p. 2Sailer et al. (2015) found MCII improved patient exercise in autonomy-focused settings but not in a highly structured setting compared to control.
“Sailer et al. (2015) found that MCII improved patient' exercise in autonomy-focused settings, but not in a highly structured setting, compared to control condition.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Sailer et al. (2015) source
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Implementation Intention and Its Effects on Goal Attainment · p. 2Adriaanse et al. (2011) found implementation intention interventions had a moderate effect for promoting healthy food inclusion (d = 0.51) and smaller effects for diminishing unhealthy eating (d = 0.29).
“Adriaanse et al. (2011) found implementation intention interventions to have a moderate effect size for promoting the inclusion of healthy food items in one's diet (Cohen's d = 0.51) and smaller effects for diminishing unhealthy eating patterns (Cohen's d = 0.29).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Adriaanse et al. (2011) source
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ The Effect of Mental Contrasting With Implementation Intentions on Goal Attainment · p. 2Kizilcec and Cohen (2017) found MCII could increase individual goal attainment (MOOCs completion rates) in individualist cultures but not collectivist cultures.
“For example, Kizilcec and Cohen (2017) found that MCII could increase individual goal attainment (massive open online courses, abbreviated by MOOCs, completion rates) in individualist cultures but not collectivist cultures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Kizilcec and Cohen (2017) source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Future Research Direction · p. 8Kizilcec and Cohen's (2017) studies on completing MOOCs found MCII to be effective for learners in individualist cultures but not learners in collectivist cultures.
“Kizilcec and Cohen's (2017) studies on completing MOOCsincluded Western and Eastern subjects and found MCII to be effective for learners in individualist cultures but not learners in collectivist cultures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Kizilcec and Cohen's (2017) source
May combine two claims.
Findingown data§ Moderator Analysis · p. 5Goal domain did not significantly moderate the effect of MCII; the effect size in the academic context (g = 0.255) was not significantly different from other contexts.
“Although the effect size in the academic context ( g = 0.255) was relatively lower than in other contexts, the difference was not significant [ Q (3) = 3.075, p = 0.380].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ Publication Bias Analysis · p. 4Fail-safe N was 482, greater than the critical value of 130, indicating that the results were reliable and there was no publication bias.
“Fail-safe N for this study was 482, greater than the critical value of 130 (5 k + 10), indicating that the results were reliable, and there was no publication bias.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ [A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Mental Contrasting With Implementation Intentions on Goal Attainment](https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.565202/full) · p. 1Type of intervention significantly moderates the MCII effect; experimenter interventions (g = 0.465) have a larger effect than document interventions (g = 0.277).
“The effect was mainly moderated by intervention style. Specifically, studies with interventions based on interactions between participants and experimenters (g = 0.465) had stronger effects than studies with interventions based on interactions between participants and documents (g = 0.277).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ Moderator Analysis · p. 5Expectation level did not significantly moderate the MCII effect; effect sizes for high expectation (g = 0.297) and low expectation (g = 0.481) did not differ significantly.
“The expectation level was not a significant moderator either, and the effect size of MCII on high expectation ( g = 0.297) and low expectation goals ( g = 0.481) did not differ significantly.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ Publication Bias Analysis · p. 4The trim-and-fill method trimmed eight studies, and the adjusted effect size was 0.242, 95% CI (0.143, 0.342).
“Finally, we used the 'trim-and-fill' method to trim eight studies, and the adjusted values were 0.242, 95% CI (0.143, 0.342).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ Intervention Effect of MCII on Goal Attainment · p. 6MCII effectively promotes individual goal achievement, with a small to medium overall effect size (g = 0.336).
“This meta-analysis found MCII to be a concise, low-cost, and effective self-regulation strategy for goal achievement, which can be used to promote goal attainment.”
- Also stated in: § CONCLUSIONS · p. 9 · plain
“(1) MCII can effectively promote individual goal achievement, with a small to medium overall effect size ( g = 0.336)”
- Also stated in: § Future Research Direction · p. 8 · plain
“Although the overall effect size of the MCII strategy was small to medium, as expected”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § CONCLUSIONS · p. 9 · plain
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Implementation Intention and Its Effects on Goal Attainment · p. 2Implementation intentions promote accessibility of situation cues and strengthen links between the anticipated situation and expected behavior so that goal-relevant behavior appears automatically upon encountering cues.
“Implementation intentions promote accessibility of situation cues (Sheeran and Webb, 2004) and strengthen the links between the anticipated situation and the expected behavior so that, upon encountering the relevant cues, goal-relevant behavior would appear automatically (Webb and Sheeran, 2007).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Sheeran and Webb, 2004
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Webb and Sheeran, 2007 source
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Mental Contrasting and Its Effects on Goal Attainment · p. 1Mental contrasting activates expectations of success: high expectations lead to commitment and pursuit; low expectations lead to postponing or abandoning wishes.
“Mentally contrasting a desired future with impeding reality can activate expectations of success: when expectations of success are high, people fully commit and pursue their goals; when expectations of success are low, people postpone or abandon the fulfillment of their wishes (Oettingen, 2000, 2012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ [A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Mental Contrasting With Implementation Intentions on Goal Attainment](https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.565202/full) · p. 1MCII is a brief and effective strategy for goal attainment with a small to moderate effect.
“The results revealed that MCII is a brief and effective strategy for goal attainment with a small to moderate effect; however, because of some publication bias, the actual effect sizes may be smaller.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Mental Contrasting and Its Effects on Goal Attainment · p. 2Cross and Sheffield (2019) found a main effect of a mental contrasting intervention on adults' physical health outcomes, with adjusted Hedges' g = 0.28, 95% CI (0.13, 0.43) at up to 4 weeks, and an increased effect g = 0.38, 95% CI (0.20, 0.55) at up to 3 months.
“A meta-analysis by Cross and Sheffield (2019) found a main effect of a mental contrasting intervention on adults' physical health outcomes, with adjusted Hedges' g = 0.28, 95% CI (0.13, 0.43) at up to 4 weeks, and an increased effect [ g = 0.38, 95% CI (0.20, 0.55)] at up to 3 months.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cross and Sheffield (2019) source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Publication Bias Analysis · p. 4The main conclusion of the meta-analysis was relatively effective and reliable despite some possible publication bias.
“In conclusion, while analyses indicated that the current study might have had some publication bias, the main conclusion of this meta-analysis was found to be relatively effective and reliable.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Mental Contrasting and Its Effects on Goal Attainment · p. 1Mental contrasting can transform positive fantasies into binding goals, urging people to overcome obstacles to attain goals.
“After imagining a positive future, thinking about obstacles that impede the realization of wishes (i.e., mental contrasting) can transform people's positive fantasies into binding goals, urging them to overcome obstacles in reality to attain their goals (Oettingen, 2000).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Oettingen, 2000 source
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Mental Contrasting and Its Effects on Goal Attainment · p. 1Thinking only about positive future outcomes decreases goal-relevant efforts and the likelihood of goal achievement.
“Several studies by Oettingen and colleagues found that thinking only about positive future outcomes decreases goal-relevant efforts, as well as the likelihood of goal achievement (e.g., Oettingen and Mayer, 2002; Kappes H. B. et al., 2012; Oettingen et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ Publication Bias Analysis · p. 4Five unpublished master's theses and doctoral dissertations were included, accounting for 21% of the corpus, sufficient to eliminate publication bias.
“Five unpublished master's theses and doctoral dissertations were included in the meta-analysis, accounting for 21% of the corpus-sufficient to eliminate publication bias.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Implementation Intention and Its Effects on Goal Attainment · p. 2Belanger-Gravel, Godin and Amireault's (2013) meta-analysis found implementation intention interventions on physical activity had a small to medium effect at postintervention (g = 0.31, 95% CI 0.11, 0.51) and follow-up (g = 0.24, 95% CI 0.13, 0.35).
“Belanger-Gravel, Godin and Amireault's (2013) meta-analysis of implementation intention interventions on physical activity found small to medium effect size [Hedge's g = 0.31 (95% CI = 0.11, 0.51) at postintervention; Hedge's g = 0.24 (95% CI = 0.13, 0.35) at follow-up].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Belanger-Gravel, Godin and Amireault's (2013) source
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Implementation Intention and Its Effects on Goal Attainment · p. 2Presseau et al. (2017) found action and/or coping planning interventions had a small to medium effect on objectively assessed health behavior (d 0.14-0.37) and a medium effect on self-reported health behavior (d 0.19-0.77).
“Presseau et al. (2017) found that action and/or coping planning (implementation intention) interventions had a small to medium effect on objectively assessed health behavior (Cohen's d ranged from 0.14 to 0.37) and a medium effect on self-reported health behavior (Cohen's d ranged from 0.19 to 0.77).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Presseau et al. (2017)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Implementation Intention and Its Effects on Goal Attainment · p. 2Gollwitzer and Sheeran (2006) found implementation intentions had a positive effect on goal attainment in achievements, relationships, and health, with a medium to large effect size Cohen's d = 0.65 (95% CI = 0.6, 0.7).
“Gollwitzer and Sheeran (2006) found that implementation intentions had a positive effect on improving goal attainment in terms of achievements, relationships, and health, with a medium to large effect size [Cohen' d = 0.65 (95% CI = 0.6, 0.7)].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gollwitzer and Sheeran (2006) source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ Type of Intervention · p. 3Face-to-face interactions have a better effect on behavior change than document interventions.
“As face-to-face interactions have been found to have a better effect on behavior change than documents interventions (Elder et al., 2005), we hypothesized that experimenter interventions would have a larger effect size than document interventions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Elder et al., 2005 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ Intervention Effect of MCII on Goal Attainment · p. 6Mental contrasting and implementation intention complement each other.
“Although we found that effect size of MCII interventions was similar to interventions employing either mental contrasting or implementation intentions, we recommend using MCII as mental contrasting and implementation intention complement each other (Kappes et al., 2012b, 2013; Oettingen, 2012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Kappes et al., 2012b, 2013
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Oettingen, 2012 source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ Moderators of the Effect of MCII on Goal Attainment · p. 8MCII was effective for people of different ages, for goal pursuit in different domains, and for different measures of behavior change.
“In addition, the effect size did not vary with sample age, goal domain, or dependent measures, revealing that MCII was effective for people of different ages, for goal pursuit in different domains, and for different measures of behavior change.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Expectations of Success · p. 3When expectations of success are high, people firmly commit to pursuing the desired outcome; when low, they postpone or abandon achievement.
“When expectations of success are high, people will firmly commit to pursuing the desired outcome; when expectations of success are low, people will postpone or abandon the achievement of their goals (Oettingen, 2012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Oettingen, 2012 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Future Research Direction · p. 8MCII should not lead to enhanced effort when members of collectivist cultures focus on individualist wishes, but it should increase effort and goal attainment when people focus on their collectivist wishes.
“MCII should not lead to enhanced effort when members of collectivist cultures focus on individualist wishes, but it should increase effort and goal attainment when people focus on their collectivist wishes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: MCII could have a similar effect size on collectivist wishes and goals in collectivist cultures as on individualist wishes and goals in individualist cultures.
The paper relies on this without support.
Studies with significant results are easier to publish, so published articles might overestimate the effect of MCII.
“Studies with significant results could be easier to publish, so published articles might overestimate the effect of MCII.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
MCII could have a similar effect size on collectivist wishes and goals in collectivist cultures as on individualist wishes and goals in individualist cultures.
“We assumed that MCII could have the similar effect size on collectivist wishes and goals in collectivist cultures as on individualist wishes and goals in individualist cultures.”
Statistics recomputed
Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.
- ConsistentQ(3) = 3.075reported p = .38 · recomputed p = .380
“Q (3) = 3.075, p = .380”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Publication bias is described as both eliminated and present
MinorThe results state that including unpublished studies was sufficient to eliminate publication bias, while the abstract says that some publication bias remains.
“Five unpublished master's theses and doctoral dissertations were included in the meta-analysis, accounting for 21% of the corpus-sufficient to eliminate publication bias.”
“however, because of some publication bias, the actual effect sizes may be smaller.”
Wang and Gai study has conflicting goal-domain classifications
MinorThe text places Wang and Gai (2016) in the personal goal domain, whereas Table 1 classifies it as Academic.
“personal goal domain, including goals that were not limited to a specific goal domain (Wang and Gai, 2016)”
“| Wang and Gai (2016) | 81 | College students | Academic | Document intervention | 5.58 | Self-report | - 0.11 | ( - 0.54, 0.33) |”
Cites
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 · Cited by 63,139 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…the heterogeneity of the effect size distribution was significant, and I2 described the percentage of total variation across studies due to heterogeneity rather than chance; 25, 50, and 75% were the boundaries for a low, medium, and high degree of heterogeneity, respectively (Higgins et al., 2003).”
BackgroundMethodBorenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009) · doi:10.1002/9780470743386 · Cited by 14,225 · see citing works
(2000) · Cited by 9,198 · see citing works
Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans.
Gollwitzer, P. M. (1999) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.54.7.493 · Cited by 5,478 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Implementation intention is an if–then plan that specifies when, where, and how the behavior will lead to the achievement of a goal (e.g., if situation y arises, then I will perform goal-directed behavior z to achieve goal x) (Gollwitzer, 1999).”
BackgroundImplementation intentions and goal achievement: a meta-analysis of effects and processes
Gollwitzer, P. M., & Sheeran, P. (2006) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(06)38002-1 · Cited by 3,236 · cited 4× · see citing works
“First, in contrast to meta-analyses that included laboratory, related, and intervention studies that found medium to large effect size (Gollwitzer and Sheeran, 2006), meta-analytical studies have found that mental contrasting interventions alone (Cross and Sheffield, 2019), or implementation intentions interventions a…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialEllis, P. D. (2010) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511761676 · Cited by 2,461 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Therefore, it was necessary to combine multiple outcomes reported in one study so that only one effect size was obtained from each independent sample (Lipsey and Wilson, 2001; Ellis, 2010).”
BackgroundHandbook of Self-Regulation: Research, Theory, and Applications
Tabor, E. B. (2006) · Psychiatric Services · doi:10.1176/appi.ps.57.4.585-a · Cited by 1,788 · see citing works
Self-regulation of goal-setting: turning free fantasies about the future into binding goals
Oettingen, G., Pak, H.-J., & Schnetter, K. (2001) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.5.736 · Cited by 619 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Expectations of success, perceived likelihood of attaining the desired outcome (i.e., general expectations, usually measured by “how likely do you think it is that you will attain your goal?”) moderate the effect of mental contrasting on goal pursuit (Oettingen, 2000; Oettingen et al., 2001).”
BackgroundThe Interplay Between Goal Intentions and Implementation Intentions
Sheeran, P., Webb, T. L., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2005) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167204271308 · Cited by 597 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Mental contrasting can not only lead to binding goals and provide goal commitment as a premise for implementation intentions (Sheeran et al., 2005) but also help people to identify obstacles in reality and to create non-conscious links between obstacles and instrumental behavior while engendering a…”
BackgroundThe motivating function of thinking about the future: Expectations versus fantasies.
Oettingen, G., & Mayer, D. (2002) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.83.5.1198 · Cited by 547 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…and Its Effects on Goal Attainment Several studies by Oettingen and colleagues found that thinking only about positive future outcomes decreases goal-relevant efforts, as well as the likelihood of goal achievement (e.g., Oettingen and Mayer, 2002; Kappes H. B. et al., 2012; Oettingen et al., 2016).”
BackgroundFuture thought and behaviour change
Oettingen, G. (2012) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/10463283.2011.643698 · Cited by 504 · cited 5× · see citing works
“…contrasting a desired future with impeding reality can activate expectations of success: when expectations of success are high, people fully commit and pursue their goals; when expectations of success are low, people postpone or abandon the fulfillment of their wishes (Oettingen, 2000, 2012).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialAdriaanse, M. A., Vinkers, C. D. W., De Ridder, D. T. D., Hox, J. J., & De Wit, J. B. F. (2011) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2010.10.012 · Cited by 455 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Adriaanse et al. (2011) found implementation intention interventions to have a moderate effect size for promoting the inclusion of healthy food items in one’s diet (Cohen’s d = 0.51) and smaller effects for diminishing unhealthy eating patterns (Cohen’s d = 0.29).”
BackgroundInfluentialHow do implementation intentions promote goal attainment? A test of component processes
Webb, T. L., & Sheeran, P. (2007) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2006.02.001 · Cited by 414 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Implementation intentions promote accessibility of situation cues (Sheeran andWebb, 2004) and strengthen the links between the anticipated situation and the expected behavior so that, upon encountering the relevant cues, goal-relevant behavior would appear automatically (Webb and Sheeran, 2007).”
BackgroundA meta-analytic review of the effect of implementation intentions on physical activity
Bélanger-Gravel, A., Godin, G., & Amireault, S. (2013) · Health Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/17437199.2011.560095 · Cited by 413 · cited 2× · see citing works
“, 2013), and mental contrasting alone or implementation intentions alone intervention studies found small-to-medium effect size (Belanger-Gravel et al., 2013; Carrero et al., 2019; Cross and Sheffield, 2019), MCII interventions had a small-to-medium effect size on behavior change.”
BackgroundDuckworth, A. L., Grant, H., Loew, B. A., Oettingen, G., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2010) · Educational Psychology · doi:10.1080/01443410.2010.506003 · Cited by 353 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…attainment and explicitly required the participants to choose feasible goals for themselves (Stadler et al., 2009, 2010; Adriaanse et al., 2010; Duckworth et al., 2013; Gawrilow et al., 2013; Houssais et al., 2013; Sailer et al., 2015; Fritzsche et al., 2016), and participants’ expectations of…”
BackgroundThose confounded moderators in meta-analysis: good, bad, and ugly
Lipsey, M. W. (2003) · The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science · doi:10.1177/0002716202250791 · Cited by 283 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The results of moderator analysis should be interpreted with caution due to the small number of studies included in the meta-analysis and covarying moderator variables across studies (Lipsey, 2003), which may cause misleading results in analyses focusing on single moderator variables.”
BackgroundExpectancy effects on behavior depend on self-regulatory thought
Oettingen, G. (2000) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2000.18.2.101 · Cited by 254 · cited 3× · see citing works
“After imagining a positive future, thinking about obstacles that impede the realization of wishes (i.e., mental contrasting) can transform people’s positive fantasies into binding goals, urging them to overcome obstacles in reality to attain their goals (Oettingen, 2000).”
BackgroundAdriaanse, M. A., Oettingen, G., Gollwitzer, P. M., Hennes, E. P., de Ridder, D. T. D., & de Wit, J. B. F. (2010) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.730 · Cited by 247 · cited 12× · see citing works
“Both laboratory experiments and field studies have shown that combining mental contrasting with implementation intentions is more effective in goal pursuit than either mental contrasting or implementation intentions (Adriaanse et al., 2010; Kirk et al., 2013).”
InfluentialStadler, G., Oettingen, G., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2010) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0018644 · Cited by 233 · cited 3× · see citing works
“MCII intervention studies increased in recent years, and most studies have shown that it can improve goal attainment (e.g., Stadler et al., 2009, 2010).”
BackgroundResultMental Contrasting and Goal Commitment: The Mediating Role of Energization
Oettingen, G., Mayer, D., Sevincer, A. T., Stephens, E. J., Pak, H.-J., & Hagenah, M. (2009) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167208330856 · Cited by 227 · see citing works
Stadler, G., Oettingen, G., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2009) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2008.09.021 · Cited by 188 · cited 6× · see citing works
“MCII intervention studies increased in recent years, and most studies have shown that it can improve goal attainment (e.g., Stadler et al., 2009, 2010).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialParks‐Stamm, E. J., Gollwitzer, P. M., & Oettingen, G. (2007) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2007.25.2.248 · Cited by 178 · cited 1× · see citing works
“A concrete plan would promote recognition of the planned cues but would make it more difficult to notice other available cues, and strictly rigid self-regulation strategies may hinder goal attainment (Parks-Stamm et al., 2007).”
BackgroundDuckworth, A. L., Kirby, T. A., Gollwitzer, A., & Oettingen, G. (2013) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550613476307 · Cited by 152 · cited 3× · see citing works
“…attainment and explicitly required the participants to choose feasible goals for themselves (Stadler et al., 2009, 2010; Adriaanse et al., 2010; Duckworth et al., 2013; Gawrilow et al., 2013; Houssais et al., 2013; Sailer et al., 2015; Fritzsche et al., 2016), and participants’ expectations of…”
Christiansen, S., Oettingen, G., Dahme, B., & Klinger, R. (2010) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2009.12.015 · Cited by 141 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…high-stakes exams (Duckworth et al., 2011) and completing online courses (Kizilcec and Cohen, 2017); the health domain, such as physical activity (Christiansen et al., 2010), healthy diet (Adriaanse et al., 2010), and stress management (Gollwitzer et al., 2018); the relationship domain, such as…”
BackgroundSelf‐regulation of time management: Mental contrasting with implementation intentions
Oettingen, G., Kappes, H. B., Guttenberg, K. B., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2015) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2090 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
da Silva, M. A. V., São‐João, T. M., Brizon, V. S. C., Franco, D. H., & Mialhe, F. L. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0206294 · Cited by 126 · cited 1× · see citing works
“A meta-analysis by Da Silva et al. (2018) found that an implementation intention intervention without reinforcement had no significant effect on adult physical activity, while an implementation intention intervention with reinforcement had a small to medium effect size on adult physical activity.”
BackgroundElder, J. P., Ayala, G. X., Campbell, N. R., Slymen, D., Lopez-Madurga, E. T., Engelberg, M., & Baquero, B. (2005) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/0278-6133.24.1.49 · Cited by 119 · cited 2× · see citing works
“On the one hand, face-to-face interventions could promote effectiveness by increasing interpersonal relationship (Elder et al., 2005).”
BackgroundKizilcec, R. F., & Cohen, G. L. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1611898114 · Cited by 113 · cited 8× · see citing works
“For example, Kizilcec and Cohen (2017) found that MCII could increase individual goal attainment (massive open online courses, abbreviated by MOOCs, completion rates) in individualist Frontiers in Psychology | www.frontiersin.org 2 May 2021 | Volume 12 | Article 565202 cultures but not collectivist…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe emergence of goal pursuit: Mental contrasting connects future and reality
Kappes, A., & Oettingen, G. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2014.03.014 · Cited by 100 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In terms of cognitive mechanisms, mental contrasting can strengthen non-conscious mental associations between the future and reality (Kappes and Oettingen, 2014), help individuals identify relevant obstacles in their current reality (Kappes et al., 2013), and increase the implicit mental link…”
BackgroundKappes, A., Singmann, H., & Oettingen, G. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2012.02.002 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Cross, A., & Sheffield, D. (2019) · Health Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/17437199.2019.1594332 · Cited by 97 · cited 7× · see citing works
“, 2013), and mental contrasting alone or implementation intentions alone intervention studies found small-to-medium effect size (Belanger-Gravel et al., 2013; Carrero et al., 2019; Cross and Sheffield, 2019), MCII interventions had a small-to-medium effect size on behavior change.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialLoy, L. S., Wieber, F., Gollwitzer, P. M., & Oettingen, G. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00607 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Culver, J. L., Arena, P. L., Wimberly, S. R., Antoni, M. H., & Carver, C. S. (2004) · Psychology and Health · doi:10.1080/08870440310001652669 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Bélanger‐Gravel, A., Godin, G., Bilodeau, A., & Poirier, P. (2012) · Psychology and Health · doi:10.1080/08870446.2012.723711 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Mental contrasting changes the meaning of reality
Kappes, A., Wendt, M., Reinelt, T., & Oettingen, G. (2013) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2013.03.010 · Cited by 75 · cited 4× · see citing works
“…for implementation intentions (Sheeran et al., 2005) but also help people to identify obstacles in reality and to create non-conscious links between obstacles and instrumental behavior while engendering a readiness for the establishment of implementation intentions (Kappes et al., 2012b, 2013).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialPromoting the Self-Regulation of Stress in Health Care Providers: An Internet-Based Intervention
Gollwitzer, P. M., Mayer, D., Frick, C. D., & Oettingen, G. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00838 · Cited by 74 · cited 5× · see citing works
“In the first group, studies compared MCII intervention conditions with no treatment control conditions (e.g., Houssais et al., 2013; Gollwitzer et al., 2018).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialPromoting integrative bargaining: mental contrasting with implementation intentions
Kirk, D., Oettingen, G., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2013) · International Journal of Conflict Management · doi:10.1108/10444061311316771 · Cited by 73 · cited 4× · see citing works
“We expect that the MCII intervention effect on goal attainment might be small to medium, although mental contrasting with implementation intentions is more effective on goal pursuit than either mental contrasting or implementation intention (Adriaanse et al., 2010; Kirk et al., 2013).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialDo Implementation Intentions Help to Turn Good Intentions into Higher Fruit Intakes?
de Nooijer, J., de Vet, E., Brug, J., & de Vries, N. K. (2006) · Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jneb.2005.11.021 · Cited by 73 · cited 3× · see citing works
“MCII interventions have been used in four different goal domains, namely, the academic domain, such as preparing for high-stakes exams (Duckworth et al., 2011) and completing online courses (Kizilcec and Cohen, 2017); the health domain, such as physical activity (Christiansen et al., 2010), healthy…”
BackgroundMethodPleasure Now, Pain Later: Positive Fantasies About the Future Predict Symptoms of Depression
Oettingen, G., Mayer, D., & Portnow, S. (2016) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797615620783 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Sailer, P., Wieber, F., Pröpster, K., Stoewer, S., Nischk, D., Volk, F., & Odenwald, M. (2015) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-015-0513-y · Cited by 60 · cited 7× · see citing works
“On the one hand, most intervention studies in this meta-analysis were designed to promote goal attainment and explicitly required the participants to choose feasible goals for themselves (Stadler et al., 2009, 2010; Adriaanse et al., 2010; Duckworth et al., 2013; Gawrilow et al., 2013; Houssais et al., 2013; Sailer et…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialGawrilow, C., Morgenroth, K., Schultz, R., Oettingen, G., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2012) · Motivation and Emotion · doi:10.1007/s11031-012-9288-3 · Cited by 60 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…required the participants to choose feasible goals for themselves (Stadler et al., 2009, 2010; Adriaanse et al., 2010; Duckworth et al., 2013; Gawrilow et al., 2013; Houssais et al., 2013; Sailer et al., 2015; Fritzsche et al., 2016), and participants’ expectations of success in the existing…”
BackgroundMethodPositive fantasies predict low academic achievement in disadvantaged students
Kappes, H. B., Oettingen, G., & Mayer, D. (2012) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.838 · Cited by 57 · cited 4× · see citing works
“…for implementation intentions (Sheeran et al., 2005) but also help people to identify obstacles in reality and to create non-conscious links between obstacles and instrumental behavior while engendering a readiness for the establishment of implementation intentions (Kappes et al., 2012b, 2013).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialMarquardt, M. K., Oettingen, G., Gollwitzer, P. M., Sheeran, P., & Liepert, J. (2017) · Rehabilitation Psychology · doi:10.1037/rep0000104 · Cited by 53 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Participants’ behavior change was assessed using subjective self-report measures, such as self-reported physical activity (Marquardt et al., 2017) or unhealthy snacking (Adriaanse et al., 2010), and objective measurement, such as attendance to a class session (Sailer et al., 2015) or course…”
MethodMental Contrasting and the Self-Regulation of Responding to Negative Feedback
Kappes, A., Oettingen, G., & Pak, H.-J. (2012) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167212446833 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Churchill, S., & Jessop, D. C. (2009) · British Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1348/135910709x475423 · Cited by 47 · cited 3× · see citing works
“this finding is that the effects of mental contrasting or implementation intentions are moderated by other variables; for example, mental contrasting can encourage individuals with low expectations of success to let go their wishes (Oettingen and Cachia, 2016), and implementation intentions has no promoting effect on…”
BackgroundSaddawi‐Konefka, D., Baker, K. H., GUARINO, A. J., Burns, S. M., Oettingen, G., Gollwitzer, P. M., & Charnin, J. E. (2017) · Journal of Graduate Medical Education · doi:10.4300/jgme-d-16-00703.1 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Bosch, I. C., Vilà, I., & Palomo, R. R. (2019) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2019.05.024 · Cited by 37 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…2010; Kirk et al., 2013), and mental contrasting alone or implementation intentions alone intervention studies found small-to-medium effect size (Belanger-Gravel et al., 2013; Carrero et al., 2019; Cross and Sheffield, 2019), MCII interventions had a small-to-medium effect size on behavior change.”
BackgroundOettingen, G. (1997) · Culture & Psychology · doi:10.1177/1354067x9733008 · Cited by 35 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Third, cultural differences in the effects of MCII strategies should be considered (Oettingen, 1997; Oettingen et al., 2008).”
BackgroundGoal Pursuit in the Context of Culture
Oettingen, G., Sevincer, A. T., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2008) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-373694-9.00009-x · Cited by 33 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Third, cultural differences in the effects of MCII strategies should be considered (Oettingen, 1997; Oettingen et al., 2008).”
BackgroundFritzsche, A., Schlier, B., Oettingen, G., & Lincoln, T. M. (2016) · Cognitive Therapy and Research · doi:10.1007/s10608-015-9749-6 · Cited by 32 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…(Stadler et al., 2009, 2010; Adriaanse et al., 2010; Duckworth et al., 2013; Gawrilow et al., 2013; Houssais et al., 2013; Sailer et al., 2015; Fritzsche et al., 2016), and participants’ expectations of success in the existing studies were all above 4 points (7 points), which was above the…”
BackgroundHoussais, S., Oettingen, G., & Mayer, D. (2012) · Motivation and Emotion · doi:10.1007/s11031-012-9307-4 · Cited by 31 · cited 3× · see citing works
“…to choose feasible goals for themselves (Stadler et al., 2009, 2010; Adriaanse et al., 2010; Duckworth et al., 2013; Gawrilow et al., 2013; Houssais et al., 2013; Sailer et al., 2015; Fritzsche et al., 2016), and participants’ expectations of success in the existing studies were all above…”
BackgroundResultWittleder, S., Kappes, A., Oettingen, G., Gollwitzer, P. M., Jay, M., & Morgenstern, J. (2019) · Health Education & Behavior · doi:10.1177/1090198119826284 · Cited by 24 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Wittleder et al. (2019) found that MCII decreased the number of drinking days for people with hazardous drinking behavior, but not for people with non-hazardous drinking behavior, compared to the control group.”
BackgroundAbbott, S., de Wit, J. B. F., Rawstorne, P., & Reynolds, R. C. (2019) · Sport Exercise and Performance Psychology · doi:10.1037/spy0000193 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Combined Effect of Mental Contrasting and Implementation Intention on College Students' Book Reading
Wang, G., & Gai, X. (2016) · Social Behavior and Personality An International Journal · doi:10.2224/sbp.2016.44.5.767 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Self-citationA study of the impact of mental contrasting and implementation intentions on academic performance
Velasquez-Sheehy, S. (2015) · Digital Commons-DePaul (DePaul University) · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Hawes, A. (2007) · OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique) · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Scheurnschloß, V. R. (2017) · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Oettingen, 2016, Problems with positive thinking and how to overcome them, 547
- Presseau, 2017, Cochrane review and meta-analysis of trials of action and/or coping planning for health behaviour change [Abstract], Euro. Health Psychol., 19, 885
- Sheeran, 2004, Implementation intentions and goal achievement: experimental tests of explanatory processes, Psychol. Health, 19, 157
- Wang, 2014, The effect of mental contrasting with implementation intention on goal pursuit
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Facilitating goal setting and planning to enhance online self-regulation of learning
Wong, J., Baars, M., He, M., de Koning, B. B., & PAAS, F. G. W. C. (2021) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2021.106913 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
“Besides, some MOOC learners might only be interested in a subset of the content within the MOOC, and as such, they might not have the intention to watch most of the lectures in the course (Wang & Baker, 2018).”
BackgroundBoosting: Empowering Citizens with Behavioral Science
Herzog, S. M., & Hertwig, R. (2024) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-020924-124753 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Bird, M. D., Swann, C., & Jackman, P. C. (2023) · Journal of Applied Sport Psychology · doi:10.1080/10413200.2023.2185699 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
“Although evidence suggests this intervention facilitates goal attainment (Wang et al., 2021), little attention has been directed toward understanding the effects of MCII within the context of applied sport psychology.”
BackgroundSchunk, D., Berger, E., Hermes, H., Winkel, K., & Fehr, E. (2022) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-022-01449-w · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Generative artificial intelligence–mediated confirmation bias in health information seeking
Lopez‐Lopez, E., Abels, C. M., Holford, D., Herzog, S. M., & Lewandowsky, S. (2025) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/nyas.15413 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Jaarsveld, G. M. V., Wong, J., Baars, M., Specht, M. M., & PAAS, F. G. W. C. (2025) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2024.1511605 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Riddell, H., Sedikides, C., Gucciardi, D. F., Jackson, B., Thøgersen‐Ntoumani, C., & Ntoumanis, N. (2022) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/jasp.12915 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
“MCII has been widely used as an intervention to encourage goal persistence in a variety of applied settings (for reviews, see Cross & Sheffield, 2019; Wang et al., 2021).”
InfluentialRiddell, H., Lamont, W. G., Lombard, M., Paduano, S., Maltagliati, S., Gucciardi, D. F., & Ntoumanis, N. (2023) · The Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/00224545.2022.2163610 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
“A recent meta-analysis found small to moderate ( g = .34) effect sizes of MCII on goal progress (Wang et al., 2021).”
BackgroundMethodJackman, P. C., Whitehead, A. E., Swann, C., & Brick, N. (2023) · Psychology of sport and exercise · doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2023.102516 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
A randomized trial of behavioral interventions yielding sustained reductions in distracted driving
Ebert, J. P., Xiong, R. A., Khan, N., Abdel-Rahman, D., Leitner, A., Everett, W. C., Gaba, K. L., Fisher, W. J., McDonald, C. C., Winston, F. K., et al. (2024) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2320603121 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
“An implementation intentions exercise was designed to help participants anticipate and plan for the three biggest obstacles to putting their phone down while driving (26, 27).”
Xu, L., Pinxten, W., Vandereyt, F., Falter, M., Scherrenberg, M., Kizilkilic, S. E., Erum, H. V., Dendale, P., & Kindermans, H. P. J. (2023) · Clinical Cardiology · doi:10.1002/clc.24128 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
“30 Nonetheless, Cross and Sheffield found that MCII had a small ‐ to ‐ medium effect on health ‐ related behavior, comparable to a mental intervention's effect size.”
BackgroundRominger, C., & Schwerdtfeger, A. R. (2023) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2023.08.004 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Carrero, I., Valor, C., Palomo, R. R., & Vila, I. M. (2025) · Sustainable Production and Consumption · doi:10.1016/j.spc.2025.02.004 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Ni, S., Cong, S., Feng, J., Sun, X., Xie, H., Han, J., Wu, Y., Wang, M., & Zhang, A. (2025) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-025-06976-0 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“Notably, MCII has exerted positive effects on other areas of behavioural change [64–66].”
Keeler, A. R., Nydegger, L. A., & Crano, W. D. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1145969 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Kirk, M. A., Nolet, J. M., Adrian, A. L., & Knust, S. K. (2023) · Military Medicine · doi:10.1093/milmed/usad103 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
The Relationship Between Predominant Promotion Focus and Spontaneous Mental Contrasting
Tamim, M., Gai, X., Wang, G., & Ma, Y. (2022) · Social Psychology · doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000507 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Self-citationLow working memory reduces the use of mental contrasting
Sevincer, A. T., Schröder, A., Plakides, A., Edler, N., & Oettingen, G. (2024) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2024.103644 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Wade, T. D., & Waller, G. (2025) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2025.104826 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Big five personality traits and spontaneous mental contrasting among Chinese students
Tamim, M., Wang, G., Gai, X., & Ma, Y. (2023) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-023-05487-z · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“MC interventions exert small effects in the academic domain compared with other domains (Wang et al., 2021).”
Self-citationMindfulness-Based Interventions for Tourette Syndrome
Reese, H. E., Brown, W. A., & Rooks, J. D. (2024) · Psychiatric Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.psc.2024.08.009 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Jaarsveld, G. M. V., Wong, J., Baars, M., Specht, M. M., & PAAS, F. G. W. C. (2025) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105441 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Riddell, H., Sedikides, C., Gucciardi, D. F., Sezer, B., Jackson, B., Thøgersen‐Ntoumani, C., & Ntoumanis, N. (2023) · Motivation Science · doi:10.1037/mot0000311 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“The literature on the utility of MCII has predominantly focused on health and academic contexts (Wang et al., 2021).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialWalck-Shannon, E. M., Rowell, S. F., Bednarski, A. E., Barber, A. M., Yuan, G., & Frey, R. F. (2023) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.23-05-0092 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“In a recent MC-II meta-analysis from broad behavior domains including health and education, one of the hypothesized reasons for varying effect sizes was varying levels of MC-II response quality (Wang et al. , 2021).”
MacPherson‐Krutsky, C., Brand, B. D., & Lindell, M. K. (2025) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/risa.17712 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“These goal setting activities are likely to increase the likelihood that implementation intentions will produce actual implementation (Locke & Latham, 2019; Wang et al., 2021).”
Kushin, M. J., & Yamamoto, M. (2023) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448231170814 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“MCII helps induce goal-directed behaviors in challenging or stressful contexts, including problematic alcohol drinking, smoking, and dieting (Cross and Sheffield, 2019; Wang et al., 2021; Webb et al., 2012).”
Causality orientations and spontaneous mental contrasting
Tamim, M., Wang, G., Gai, X., & Ma, Y. (2024) · The Journal of General Psychology · doi:10.1080/00221309.2024.2317240 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“Furthermore, prior research has not included autonomy support while teaching mental contrasting (Wang et al., 2021).”
InfluentialSelf-citationSezer, B., Ntoumanis, N., Riddell, H., & Gucciardi, D. F. (2025) · Psychology and Health · doi:10.1080/08870446.2025.2491593 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Hoff, B. F., & Napolitano, C. M. (2023) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-023-04905-6 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“Past research has indi - cated that adopting a contingent backup plan type may be linked to implementation intentions, which are effective for goal attainment (Napolitano & Freund, 2016; Wang et al., 2021).”
Ebert, J. P., Yan, R., Friday, S., Small, D. S., McDonald, C. C., Bartolozzi, K., & Delgado, M. K. (2025) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2024.307980 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Alidu, L., Al-Khudairy, L., Bharatan, I., Bird, P., Campbell, N., Currie, G., Hemming, K., Jolly, K. B., Kudrna, L., Lilford, R. J., et al. (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0282848 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“Systematic reviews show that mental contrasting without and with implementation intentions is an effective health behaviour change intervention [11, 12].”
BackgroundDo changes in beliefs improve creativity?
Toyama, M., Mizumoto, Y., & Murayama, S. (2023) · The Japanese journal of psychology · doi:10.4992/jjpsy.94.22018 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
O’Driscoll, C., Singh, A., Chichua, I., Clodic, J., Desai, A., Nikolova, D., Yap, A. A. M., Zhou, I., & Pilling, S. (2024) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/49857 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“There is evidence that the mode of learning may affect the effect size, where facilitator-led is stronger than self-facilitated [44].”
BackgroundMental Contrasting Strategies Promote the Pursuit of Difficult Goals: Japanese Cultural Context
Toyama, M., Nagamine, M., & Tang, L. (2024) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672241247481 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“Recent research on mental contrasting with implementation intention (MCII) reports no significant difference in effect size between high ( g = 0.297) and low ( g = 0.481) goal attainability (Wang et al., 2021).”
InfluentialSimmonds‐Buckley, M., Kellett, S., Hague, J., & Waller, G. (2025) · The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist · doi:10.1017/s1754470x24000412 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“Implementation intentions have been shown to close the intention – behaviour gap and so increase goal attainment (Wang et al ., 2021).”
Branching Foresight - A Novel Interaction Concept for AI-generated Scenario Exploration
Uhl, J. C., Huber, M., Gürel, A., Westfahl, S., Killian, S., Schweiger, H., Rind, A., Regal, G., & Tscheligi, M. (2026) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3772318.3793527 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“…(Section 2), the increases in transilience are consistent with brief prospection exercises (e.g., episodic future thinking, best-possible-self) that heighten vividness and personal relevance, and with planning scaffolds akin to mental contrasting with implementation intentions [6, 23, 25, 38, 57].”
InfluentialWhich Planning Tactics Predict Online Course Completion?
Cho, J. Y., Tao, Y., Yeomans, M., Tingley, D. H., & Kizilcec, R. F. (2024) · International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK) · doi:10.1145/3636555.3636891 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“Different ways of planning have been proposed and found to be effective in promoting goal-directed behaviors [9, 15, 28, 60].”
BackgroundPuca, R. M., & Schüler, J. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-68476-4_8 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Pignatiello, G. A., Tuschman, P., Griggs, S. A., Schiltz, N. K., Demaree, H. A., Klinck, A., Hoffer, A., & Hickman, R. L. (2025) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/73769 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“…context-relevant examples (Figures S2 and S3 in Multimedia Appendix 1), guiding participants through an evaluation of the various applied examples, and establishing an implementation intention to use their preferred strategies when they become aware of symptoms discussed in module 1 [27,37,38].”
Khamidulina, M. S., & Maloshonok, N. (2025) · Высшее образование в России · doi:10.31992/0869-3617-2025-34-1-106-127 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Hope and behavioural weight loss: Pathways lead to greater weight loss than agency or goals
Medlin, A. R., Sinclair, K. L., & Hawkins, M. A. W. (2025) · British Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjhp.12801 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Their results consistently show – while hopeful positive fantasizing alone did not help people reach their desired goals – two strategies did: mental contrasting and implementation intention (MCII) (Wang et al., 2021).”
Can an Authentic Assessment Task Improve the Health Behaviours of Undergraduate Students?
Meincke, J., Gwynne, K. G., Chiu, C. L., Bhatti, A. J., Christie, V., Janszen, J., Nazareth, L., Needham, I., & Kirwan, M. (2023) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci13070727 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Future Me: Promoting a future-oriented outlook through conversation with our future self.Preprint
Lash, E., Dechant, M., & O’Driscoll, C. (2024) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/eh62p · Cited by 1 · see citing works
O’Driscoll, C., Singh, A., Chichua, I., Clodic, J., Desai, A., Nikolova, D., Yap, A. A. M., Zhou, I., & Pilling, S. (2023) · doi:10.2196/preprints.49857 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
The Implementation of Mental Contrasting in Romantic Relationship: A Review
Zhu, Y. (2022) · Psychology · doi:10.4236/psych.2022.132016
(2023) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-18750-6.00028-6
Batcup, C., Bonner, C., & Ayre, J. (2023) · Health Promotion Journal of Australia · doi:10.1002/hpja.713
An ecological momentary intervention to support dynamic goal pursuit: pilot study.Preprint
O’Driscoll, C., Singh, A., Chichua, I., Clodic, J., Desai, A. V., Nikolova, D., Yap, A. A. M., Zhou, I., & Pilling, S. (2023) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/6b4w2
Tackling upcoming projects: The development and efficacy of event previews an experimental study
Schollaert, E., Mertens, S., Anseel, F., Kluijtmans, T., Servaes, M., & Crucke, S. (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0293271
“Researchers suggest shifting the focus from the past to the future by incorporating mental simulations of the future and performance targets [15, 21].”
BackgroundVandyousefi, S., Oettingen, G., Wittleder, S., Moin, T., Sweat, V., Aguilar, A. D., Ruan, A., Angelotti, G., Wong, L., Orstad, S. L., et al. (2024) · Contemporary Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/j.cct.2024.107523
Mroz, E. L., Schwartz, A. E., Valeika, S., Oettingen, G., Marottoli, R. A., David, D., Hagaman, A. K., Fedus, D., & Monin, J. K. (2024) · International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/gps.6092
“13,14 This leads to effective goal pursuit, 15,16 particularly in challenging contexts.”
BackgroundKudrna, L., Yates, J., Alidu, L., Hemming, K., Quinn, L., Schmidtke, K. A., Jones, J., Al-Khudairy, L., Jolly, K., Bird, P., et al. (2025) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph22030398 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“A prominent goal-based intervention demonstrated to be effective across contexts related to health, academic achievement, and pro-social behaviour is ‘mental contrasting plus implementation intentions’ (MCII) [7,8].”
González-González, R., Solier-López, L., Vilar‐López, R., Verdejo-García, A., Navarro‐Pérez, C. F., & Caracuel, A. (2025) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2025.108209
Thissen, B. A. K., Barthelmäs, M., Stöckle, D., Oettingen, G., & Keller, J. (2025) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-025-08327-4
Broonen, J.-P., & Carosin, É. (2025) · L’Orientation scolaire et professionnelle · doi:10.4000/15bb0
The Search for the Well-Tempered Soul
Krueger, J. I. (2025) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.5406/19398298.138.4.05
Aygün, Y., Gürer, H., Tüfekçi, Ş., Çolak, C., Güldoğan, E., Yagin, B., UCUZAL, H., Canpolat, B., Alkhamees, N. H., & Al-Mhanna, S. B. (2026) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-026-46181-x
Mental Contrasting With Implementation Intentions
Sonnentag, S., Völker, J., & Koch, T. J. S. (2026) · European Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1027/2512-8442/a000195
Mikheeva, E. V. (2025) · Herald of Omsk University Series Psychology · doi:10.24147/2410-6364.2025.3.19-28
Sjöberg, A., & Söderfjäll, S. (2026) · Industrial and Commercial Training · doi:10.1108/ict-06-2025-0075
- Authors
- Wang, G., Wang, Y., & Gai, X.
- Affiliations
- Northeast Normal University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Wang, Guoxia
- Venue
- Frontiers in Psychology
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2021-05-12
- Volume
- 12
- Pages
- 565202-565202
- ISSN
- 1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8149892
- OpenAlex
- W3160299755
- Semantic Scholar
- 5de2a92c04277de8f628eecd6b4a95473e6bfb7f
- Cited by
- 62
- References
- 57
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 1.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Keywords
- mental contrasting with implementation intentions, goal achievement, self-regulation, implementation intentions, mental contrasting, moderators of intervention effectiveness, brief intervention
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-12.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-12.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review