Cited by 57Education, Achievement, and GiftednessOptimism, Hope, and Well-beingPsychological and Temporal Perspectives Research

Positive fantasies predict low academic achievement in disadvantaged students

Kappes, Heather Barry, Oettingen, Gabriele, Mayer, Doris·2012·European Journal of Social Psychology

Abstract

Unlike other forms of positive thinking (e.g., expectations), research finds that positive fantasies (experiencing one's thoughts and mental images about the future positively) predict low effort and little success in several domains. However, for vocational education students of low socioeconomic status and minority ethnicity, for whom the present environment is especially difficult, perhaps it would be appropriate to indulge in positive fantasies that depict the future as bright and easily attained. Three studies show that this is not the case. Positive future fantasies measured early in the program predicted more days absent (Studies 2–3) and lower grades at the end of the program (Studies 1–3), even when adjusting for initial academic competence, expectations of successful achievement, and self‐discipline. Expectations of successful achievement predicted fewer days absent and higher grades only when measured midway through the school year, once participants had experience with their own academic standing (Study 3). Results indicate that positive fantasies, which allow people to indulge in images of a bright future, predict poor achievement even in vocational students immersed in a particularly difficult environment. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ejsp.838

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Thinking only about positive future outcomes decreases goal-relevant efforts and the likelihood of goal achievement.

    “Several studies by Oettingen and colleagues found that thinking only about positive future outcomes decreases goal-relevant efforts, as well as the likelihood of goal achievement (e.g., Oettingen and Mayer, 2002; Kappes H. B. et al., 2012; Oettingen et al., 2016).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kappes, H. B., Oettingen, G., & Mayer, D.
Affiliations
  • New York University (US)
  • Universität Hamburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Kappes, Heather Barry
Venue
European Journal of Social Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-08-10
Volume
42
Issue
1
Pages
53-64
ISSN
  • 0046-2772 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0992
OpenAlex
W2101130035
Cited by
57
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research
Keywords
academic performance, vocational education students, low socioeconomic status, minority students, school absenteeism, achievement expectations, self-control, academic self-concept, disadvantaged students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review