Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 405

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Mammalian cell cytotoxicity and genotoxicity analysis of drinking water disinfection by‐products

Plewa, Michael J., Kargalioglu, Yahya, Vankerk, Danielle, Minear, Roger A., Wagner, Elizabeth D.·2002·Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis

Abstract

Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity assays were used to analyze drinking water disinfection by‐products (DBPs) in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) AS52 cells. The DBPs were chosen because they are common in drinking water, resulting from conventional disinfection using chlorination and chloramination. Data were also available to compare these results with cytotoxicity and mutagenicity studies in Salmonella typhimurium. The rank order in decreasing chronic cytotoxicity measured in a microplate‐based assay was bromoacetic acid (BA) ≫ 3‐chloro‐4‐(dichloromethyl)‐5‐hydroxy‐2[5H]‐furanone (MX) > dibromoacetic acid (DBA) > chloroacetic acid (CA) > KBrO 3 > tribromoacetic acid (TBA) > EMS (ethylmethanesulfonate, positive control) > dichloroacetic acid (DCA) > trichloroacetic acid (TCA). The induction of DNA strand breaks by these agents was measured by alkaline single‐cell gel electrophoresis (SCGE, comet assay) and the rank order in decreasing genotoxicity was BA ≫ MX > CA > DBA > TBA > EMS > KBrO 3, while DCA and TCA were refractory. BA was more cytotoxic (31×) and genotoxic (14×) than MX in CHO cells. BA was over 400× more genotoxic than potassium bromate. The brominated haloacetic acids (HAAs) were more cytotoxic and genotoxic than their chlorinated analogs. The HAAs expressed a statistically significant inverse relationship in CHO cell cytotoxicity and genotoxicity as a function of increased numbers of halogen atoms per molecule. A quantitative comparison was conducted with results from a previous study with cytotoxicity and mutagenicity in S. typhimurium. There was no correlation between chronic CHO cell and bacterial cell cytotoxicity. DBP‐induced CHO cell cytotoxicity was not related to mutagenic potency in S. typhimurium. Cytotoxicity in CHO cells was statistically significant and highly correlated to CHO cell genotoxicity. Finally, we determined that the DBP genotoxic potency in CHO cells and the mutagenic potency in S. typhimurium were not related. This suggests that toxicity data in S. typhimurium did not quantitatively predict the toxic effects of DBPs in mammalian cell systems. The microplate CHO cell cytotoxicity and genotoxicity assays were well suited for the analysis of DBPs, especially when the quantity of test material is limited. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 40:134–142, 2002. © 2002 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/em.10092

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 405

Metadata

Authors
Plewa, M. J., Kargalioglu, Y., Vankerk, D., Minear, R. A., & Wagner, E. D.
Venue
Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-01
Volume
40
Issue
2
Pages
134-142
ISSN
  • 0893-6692 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-2280
OpenAlex
W2098565463
Cited by
405
References
0
FWCI
4.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mammalian cell cytotoxicity and genotoxicity analysis of drinking water disinfection by‐products. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/em.10092
The paper
Plewa, M. J., Kargalioglu, Y., Vankerk, D., Minear, R. A., & Wagner, E. D. (2002). Mammalian cell cytotoxicity and genotoxicity analysis of drinking water disinfection by‐products. Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis. https://doi.org/10.1002/em.10092

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.