The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Optimum tuned‐mass dampers for minimizing steady‐state response of support‐excited and damped systems
Abstract
A numerical searching procedure to find the optimum tuning frequency and damping ratio of the tuned‐mass damper which can reduce the steady‐state response of damped main systems to a minimum level is developed and applied to the two different harmonic excitation sources, support motion of fixed‐displacement amplitude and support motion of fixed‐acceleration amplitude. The explicit formulae for these optimum parameters are then derived through a sequence of curve‐fitting schemes. It has been found that, as the error of the explicit formulae is negligible, they provide a convenient tool to compute the optimum parameters in engineering applications. The numerical results show that the tuned‐mass damper is less effective in reducing the system's response when there is a high level of damping incorporated into the system. It is also found that the optimum tuning frequency is strongly influenced by the damping level of a system, especially in regard to the fixed‐acceleration support motion, but the optimum damping ratio of the tuned‐mass damper is not sensitive to the damping level of a system. The response of the damped system using the undamped optimum value as the damping of the tuned‐mass damper is not much different from the response using the damped optimum value.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
BISHOP, R. E. D. (1957) · Nature · doi:10.1038/179504a0 · Cited by 1,636
Optimum absorber parameters for various combinations of response and excitation parameters
Warburton, G. B. (1982) · Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics · doi:10.1002/eqe.4290100304 · Cited by 1,043
The Theory of the Dynamic Vibration Absorber
Ormondroyd, J., & Den Hartog, J. P. (1928) · Transactions of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers · doi:10.1115/1.4058553 · Cited by 779
Optimum absorber parameters for simple systems
Warburton, G. B., & Ayorinde, E. O. (1980) · Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics · doi:10.1002/eqe.4290080302 · Cited by 368
A Note on the Damped Vibration Absorber
Brock, J. E. (1946) · Journal of Applied Mechanics · doi:10.1115/1.4009588 · Cited by 356
Thompson, A. (1981) · Journal of Sound and Vibration · doi:10.1016/s0022-460x(81)80176-9 · Cited by 149
Cited by
Parametric study and simplified design of tuned mass dampers
Rana, R., & Soong, T. T. (1998) · Engineering Structures · doi:10.1016/s0141-0296(97)00078-3 · Cited by 651
Research developments in vibration control of structures using passive tuned mass dampers
Elias, S., & Matsagar, V. (2017) · Annual Reviews in Control · doi:10.1016/j.arcontrol.2017.09.015 · Cited by 556
Particle swarm optimization of tuned mass dampers
Leung, A. Y. T., & Zhang, H. (2009) · Engineering Structures · doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.11.017 · Cited by 259
Li, C. (2002) · Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics · doi:10.1002/eqe.128 · Cited by 189
Design of a magnetic vibration absorber with tunable stiffnesses
Benacchio, S., Malher, A., Boisson, J., & Touzé, C. (2016) · Nonlinear Dynamics · doi:10.1007/s11071-016-2731-3 · Cited by 95
Metadata
- Authors
- Tsai, H., & Lin, G.
- Venue
- Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1993-11
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 957-973
- ISSN
- 0098-8847 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9845
- OpenAlex
- W1977157644
- Cited by
- 271
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 4.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optimum tuned‐mass dampers for minimizing steady‐state response of support‐excited and damped systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/eqe.4290221104
- The paper
- Tsai, H., & Lin, G. (1993). Optimum tuned‐mass dampers for minimizing steady‐state response of support‐excited and damped systems. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290221104
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.