Cited by 67Eating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorChild Nutrition and Feeding Issues

Feasibility Study Combining Art Therapy or Cognitive Remediation Therapy with Family‐based Treatment for Adolescent Anorexia Nervosa

Open access
Lock, James, Fitzpatrick, Kathleen Kara, Agras, William S., Weinbach, Noam, Jo, Booil·2018·European Eating Disorders Review

Abstract

Adolescents with anorexia nervosa who have obsessive–compulsive (OC) features respond poorly to family‐based treatment (FBT). This study evaluated the feasibility of combining FBT with either cognitive remediation therapy (CRT) or art therapy (AT) to improve treatment response in this at‐risk group. Thirty adolescents with anorexia nervosa and OC features were randomized to 15 sessions of FBT + CRT or AT. Recruitment rate was 1 per month, and treatment attrition was 16.6% with no differences between groups. Suitability, expectancy and therapeutic relationships were acceptable for both combinations. Correlations between changes in OC traits and changes in cognitive inefficiencies were found for both combinations. Moderate changes in cognitive inefficiencies were found in both groups but were larger in the FBT + AT combination. This study suggests that an RCT for poor responders to FBT because of OC traits combining FBT with either CRT or AT is feasible to conduct. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and Eating Disorders Association.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/erv.2571

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lock, J., Fitzpatrick, K. K., Agras, W. S., Weinbach, N., & Jo, B.
Affiliations
Stanford Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Lock, James
Venue
European Eating Disorders Review
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-11-20
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
62-68
ISSN
  • 1072-4133 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0968
OpenAlex
W2770222197
Cited by
67
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5
FWCI
5.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Eating Disorders Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (5R34MH10128103)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
Keywords
adolescent anorexia nervosa, family-based treatment, art therapy, cognitive remediation, obsessive-compulsive traits, treatment feasibility, treatment discontinuation, eating disorders
MeSH terms
Cognitive Remediation, Adolescent, Anorexia Nervosa, Art Therapy, Combined Modality Therapy, Compulsive Behavior, Family Therapy, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Obsessive Behavior, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review