Cited by 77Eating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Effectiveness of cognitive remediation and emotion skills training (CREST) for anorexia nervosa in group format: a naturalistic pilot study

Tchanturia, Kate, Doris, Eli, Fleming, Caroline·2014·European Eating Disorders Review

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate a novel and brief skills-based therapy for inpatients with anorexia nervosa, which addressed 'cold' and 'hot' cognitions in group format. METHOD: Adult inpatients with anorexia nervosa participated in the cognitive remediation and emotion skills training groups. Participants who attended all group sessions completed patient satisfaction and self-report questionnaires. RESULTS: Analysis of the data showed that social anhedonia (measured by the Revised Social Anhedonia Scale) decreased significantly between pre- and post-interventions, with small effect size (d=0.39). Motivation (perceived 'importance to change' and 'ability to change') was found to have increased with small effect sizes (d=0.23 and d=0.16), but these changes did not reach statistical significance. The cognitive remediation and emotion skills training group had positive feedback from both the patients and therapists delivering this structured intervention. CONCLUSION: Improved strategies are needed both in supporting inpatients to tolerate the group therapy setting and in helping them to develop the skills necessary for participation. Further larger-scale research in this area is needed to consolidate these findings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/erv.2287

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Social anhedonia has been reported to reduce following an intervention comprising cognitive remediation and emotion skills training in adults with anorexia.

    “Social anhedonia has been reported to reduce following an intervention comprising cognitive remediation and emotion skills training in adults with anorexia (103, 104).”

    From A transdiagnostic perspective on social anhedonia (2019) · cites this paper as [104]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tchanturia, K., Doris, E., & Fleming, C.
Affiliations
  • Ilia State University (GE)
  • South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Tchanturia, Kate
Venue
European Eating Disorders Review
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-03-11
Volume
22
Issue
3
Pages
200-205
ISSN
  • 1072-4133 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0968
OpenAlex
W2117538820
Cited by
77
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 7
FWCI
13.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Eating Disorders Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
anorexia nervosa, cognitive remediation, group therapy, inpatient care, social anhedonia, motivation, patient satisfaction
MeSH terms
Adult, Anorexia Nervosa, Attitude of Health Personnel, Behavior Therapy, Cognition, Emotions, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Inpatients, Motivation, Pilot Projects, Psychotherapy, Group, Surveys and Questionnaires, Treatment Outcome, Patient Satisfaction, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review