Initial hydrologic and geomorphic response following a wildfire in the Colorado Front Range
Abstract
A wildfire in May 1996 burned 4690 hectares in two watersheds forested by ponderosa pine and Douglas fir in a steep, mountainous landscape with a summer, convective thunderstorm precipitation regime. The wildfire lowered the erosion threshold in the watersheds, and consequently amplified the subsequent erosional response to shorter time interval episodic rainfall and created both erosional and depositional features in a complex pattern throughout the watersheds. The initial response during the first four years was an increase in runoff and erosion rates followed by decreases toward pre‐fire rates. The maximum unit‐area peak discharge was 24 m 3 s −1 km −2 for a rainstorm in 1996 with a rain intensity of 90 mm h −1 . Recovery to pre‐fire conditions seems to have occurred by 2000 because for a maximum 30‐min rainfall intensity of 50 mm h −1 , the unit‐area peak discharge in 1997 was 6.6 m 3 s −1 km −2 , while in 2000 a similar intensity produced only 0.11 m 3 s −1 km −2 . Rill erosion accounted for 6 per cent, interrill erosion for 14 per cent, and drainage erosion for 80 per cent of the initial erosion in 1996. This represents about a 200‐fold increase in erosion rates on hillslopes which had a recovery or relaxation time of about three years. About 67 per cent of the initially eroded sediment is still stored in the watersheds after four years with an estimated residence time greater than 300 years. This residence time is much greater than the fire recurrence interval so erosional and depositional features may become legacies from the wildfire and may affect landscape evolution by acting as a new set of initial conditions for subsequent wildfire and flood sequences. Published in 2001 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the few cases where data are available, 2-to-5-times increases in peak flows over 6-7 years have been reported.
“However, in the few cases where data are available, 2-to 5-times increases in peak flows over 6-7 years have been reported.40”
From Wildfire and the Future of Water Supply (2014) · cites this paper as [40]
The greatest erosion events typically occur before vegetation has redeveloped and often coincide with episodic, short-duration, high intensity rain storms immediately following severe wildfire.
“The greatest erosion events typically occur before vegetation has redeveloped and often coincide with episodic, short-duration, high intensity rain storms immediately following severe wildfire.40”
From Wildfire and the Future of Water Supply (2014) · cites this paper as [40]
Four years after the Buffalo Creek fire in Colorado, it was estimated that 67% of the sediment mobilized by postfire erosion remained stored in streams and would likely persist for more than 300 years.
“Four years after the Buffalo Creek fire in Colorado, for example, it was estimated that 67% of the sediment mobilized by postfire erosion remained stored in streams and would likely persist for more than 300 years.40”
From Wildfire and the Future of Water Supply (2014) · cites this paper as [40]
Collectively, the impacts of wildfire on hydrologic processes can cause precipitation with frequent return intervals to generate disproportionately large peak flows, shorten time to peak flows, and increase susceptibility to flash floods.
“Collectively, the impacts of wildfire on hydrologic processes can cause precipitation with frequent return intervals to generate disproportionately large peak flows, shorten time to peak flows, and increase susceptibility to flash floods.40”
From Wildfire and the Future of Water Supply (2014) · cites this paper as [40]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wildfire and the Future of Water Supply
Bladon, K. D., Emelko, M. B., Silins, U., & Stone, M. (2014) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es500130g · Cited by 354 · see citing works
Moody, J. A., & Martin, D. A. (2009) · International Journal of Wildland Fire · doi:10.1071/wf07162 · Cited by 283 · see citing works
Self-citationMoody, J. A., & Martin, D. A. (2001) · Hydrological Processes · doi:10.1002/hyp.386 · Cited by 272 · see citing works
Self-citationRhoades, C. C., Entwistle, D., & Butler, D. (2011) · International Journal of Wildland Fire · doi:10.1071/wf09086 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Silins, U., Bladon, K. D., Kelly, E. N., Esch, E., Spence, J. R., Stone, M., Emelko, M. B., Boon, S., Wagner, M. J., Williams, C. H. S., et al. (2014) · Ecohydrology · doi:10.1002/eco.1474 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Ecological foundations for fire management in North American forest and shrubland ecosystems
Keeley, J. E., Aplet, G. H., Christensen, N. L., Conard, S. G., Johnson, E. A., Omi, P. N., Peterson, D. L., & Swetnam, T. W. (2009) · doi:10.2737/pnw-gtr-779 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Stormwater contaminant loading following southern California wildfires
Stein, E. D., Brown, J. S., Hogue, T. S., Burke, M. P., & Kinoshita, A. (2012) · Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry · doi:10.1002/etc.1994 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Legleiter, C. J., Lawrence, R. L., Fonstad, M. A., Andrew Marcus, W., & Aspinall, R. (2003) · Geomorphology · doi:10.1016/s0169-555x(02)00332-x · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Williams, C. J., Pierson, F. B., Robichaud, P. R., & Boll, J. (2014) · International Journal of Wildland Fire · doi:10.1071/wf12161 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Ebel, B. A., Rengers, F. K., & Tucker, G. E. (2016) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1002/2016wr019110 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
- Authors
- Moody, J. A., & Martin, D. A.
- Affiliations
- United States Geological Survey (US)
- Corresponding author
- Moody, John A.
- Venue
- Earth Surface Processes and Landforms
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-09
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1049-1070
- ISSN
- 0197-9337 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9837
- OpenAlex
- W2076904246
- Cited by
- 493
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 32
- FWCI
- 17.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Earth Surface Processes and Landforms (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
- Keywords
- wildfire effects on hydrology, post-fire erosion, sediment residence time, peak discharge, rill erosion, interrill erosion, sediment storage, ponderosa pine, Pseudotsuga menziesii, Colorado Front Range, landscape evolution
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review