Cited by 493Soil erosion and sediment transportFire effects on ecosystemsHydrology and Sediment Transport Processes

Initial hydrologic and geomorphic response following a wildfire in the Colorado Front Range

Moody, John A., Martin, Deborah A.·2001·Earth Surface Processes and Landforms

Abstract

A wildfire in May 1996 burned 4690 hectares in two watersheds forested by ponderosa pine and Douglas fir in a steep, mountainous landscape with a summer, convective thunderstorm precipitation regime. The wildfire lowered the erosion threshold in the watersheds, and consequently amplified the subsequent erosional response to shorter time interval episodic rainfall and created both erosional and depositional features in a complex pattern throughout the watersheds. The initial response during the first four years was an increase in runoff and erosion rates followed by decreases toward pre‐fire rates. The maximum unit‐area peak discharge was 24 m 3 s −1 km −2 for a rainstorm in 1996 with a rain intensity of 90 mm h −1 . Recovery to pre‐fire conditions seems to have occurred by 2000 because for a maximum 30‐min rainfall intensity of 50 mm h −1 , the unit‐area peak discharge in 1997 was 6.6 m 3 s −1 km −2 , while in 2000 a similar intensity produced only 0.11 m 3 s −1 km −2 . Rill erosion accounted for 6 per cent, interrill erosion for 14 per cent, and drainage erosion for 80 per cent of the initial erosion in 1996. This represents about a 200‐fold increase in erosion rates on hillslopes which had a recovery or relaxation time of about three years. About 67 per cent of the initially eroded sediment is still stored in the watersheds after four years with an estimated residence time greater than 300 years. This residence time is much greater than the fire recurrence interval so erosional and depositional features may become legacies from the wildfire and may affect landscape evolution by acting as a new set of initial conditions for subsequent wildfire and flood sequences. Published in 2001 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/esp.253

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the few cases where data are available, 2-to-5-times increases in peak flows over 6-7 years have been reported.

    “However, in the few cases where data are available, 2-to 5-times increases in peak flows over 6-7 years have been reported.40”

    From Wildfire and the Future of Water Supply (2014) · cites this paper as [40]

  • The greatest erosion events typically occur before vegetation has redeveloped and often coincide with episodic, short-duration, high intensity rain storms immediately following severe wildfire.

    “The greatest erosion events typically occur before vegetation has redeveloped and often coincide with episodic, short-duration, high intensity rain storms immediately following severe wildfire.40”

    From Wildfire and the Future of Water Supply (2014) · cites this paper as [40]

  • Four years after the Buffalo Creek fire in Colorado, it was estimated that 67% of the sediment mobilized by postfire erosion remained stored in streams and would likely persist for more than 300 years.

    “Four years after the Buffalo Creek fire in Colorado, for example, it was estimated that 67% of the sediment mobilized by postfire erosion remained stored in streams and would likely persist for more than 300 years.40”

    From Wildfire and the Future of Water Supply (2014) · cites this paper as [40]

  • Collectively, the impacts of wildfire on hydrologic processes can cause precipitation with frequent return intervals to generate disproportionately large peak flows, shorten time to peak flows, and increase susceptibility to flash floods.

    “Collectively, the impacts of wildfire on hydrologic processes can cause precipitation with frequent return intervals to generate disproportionately large peak flows, shorten time to peak flows, and increase susceptibility to flash floods.40”

    From Wildfire and the Future of Water Supply (2014) · cites this paper as [40]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moody, J. A., & Martin, D. A.
Affiliations
United States Geological Survey (US)
Corresponding author
Moody, John A.
Venue
Earth Surface Processes and Landforms
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-09
Volume
26
Issue
10
Pages
1049-1070
ISSN
  • 0197-9337 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9837
OpenAlex
W2076904246
Cited by
493
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 32
FWCI
17.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Earth Surface Processes and Landforms (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
Keywords
wildfire effects on hydrology, post-fire erosion, sediment residence time, peak discharge, rill erosion, interrill erosion, sediment storage, ponderosa pine, Pseudotsuga menziesii, Colorado Front Range, landscape evolution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review