The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Guidelines on the use of structure‐from‐motion photogrammetry in geomorphic research
Open accessAbstract
As a topographic modelling technique, structure‐from‐motion (SfM) photogrammetry combines the utility of digital photogrammetry with a flexibility and ease of use derived from multi‐view computer vision methods. In conjunction with the rapidly increasing availability of imagery, particularly from unmanned aerial vehicles, SfM photogrammetry represents a powerful tool for geomorphological research. However, to fully realize this potential, its application must be carefully underpinned by photogrammetric considerations, surveys should be reported in sufficient detail to be repeatable (if practical) and results appropriately assessed to understand fully the potential errors involved. To deliver these goals, robust survey and reporting must be supported through (i) using appropriate survey design, (ii) applying suitable statistics to identify systematic error (bias) and to estimate precision within results, and (iii) propagating uncertainty estimates into the final data products. © 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
‘Structure-from-Motion’ photogrammetry: A low-cost, effective tool for geoscience applications
Westoby, M. J., Brasington, J., Glasser, N. F., Hambrey, M. J., & Reynolds, J. M. (2012) · Geomorphology · doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.08.021 · Cited by 4,044
An Introduction to Error Analysis: The Study of Uncertainties in Physical Measurements
Cohen, E. R. (1998) · Measurement Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/0957-0233/9/6/022 · Cited by 1,499
Topographic structure from motion: a new development in photogrammetric measurement
Fonstad, M. A., Dietrich, J. T., Courville, B. C., Jensen, J. L., & Carbonneau, P. E. (2013) · Earth Surface Processes and Landforms · doi:10.1002/esp.3366 · Cited by 1,126
James, M. R., & Robson, S. (2012) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface · doi:10.1029/2011jf002289 · Cited by 1,116
Self-citationLucieer, A., de Jong, S. M., & Turner, D. (2013) · Progress in Physical Geography Earth and Environment · doi:10.1177/0309133313515293 · Cited by 748
Turner, D., Lucieer, A., & Watson, C. (2012) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs4051392 · Cited by 744
Accuracy assessment of digital elevation models by means of robust statistical methods
Höhle, J., & Höhle, M. (2009) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2009.02.003 · Cited by 743
Image-based surface reconstruction in geomorphometry – merits, limits and developments
Eltner, A., Kaiser, A., Castillo, C., Rock, G., Neugirg, F., & Abellán, A. (2016) · Earth Surface Dynamics · doi:10.5194/esurf-4-359-2016 · Cited by 588
Self-citationJames, M. R., Robson, S., & Smith, M. W. (2017) · Earth Surface Processes and Landforms · doi:10.1002/esp.4125 · Cited by 498
Self-citationHigh-resolution monitoring of Himalayan glacier dynamics using unmanned aerial vehicles
Immerzeel, W. W., Kraaijenbrink, P. D. A., Shea, J. M., Shrestha, A. B., Pellicciotti, F., Bierkens, M. F. P., & de Jong, S. M. (2014) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2014.04.025 · Cited by 496
Woodget, A. S., Carbonneau, P. E., Visser, F., & Maddock, I. P. (2015) · Earth Surface Processes and Landforms · doi:10.1002/esp.3613 · Cited by 424
Editorial Policy Statement on the Control of Numerical Accuracy
Roache, P. J., Ghia, K. N., & White, F. M. (1986) · Journal of Fluids Engineering · doi:10.1115/1.3242537 · Cited by 359
Dietrich, J. (2016) · Earth Surface Processes and Landforms · doi:10.1002/esp.4060 · Cited by 318
Smith, M. W., & Vericat, D. (2015) · Earth Surface Processes and Landforms · doi:10.1002/esp.3747 · Cited by 313
Multi‐temporal UAV data for automatic measurement of rill and interrill erosion on loess soil
Eltner, A., Baumgart, P., Maas, H., & Faust, D. (2015) · Earth Surface Processes and Landforms · doi:10.1002/esp.3673 · Cited by 238
Self-citationHarwin, S., Lucieer, A., & Osborn, J. (2015) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs70911933 · Cited by 187
Nouwakpo, S. K., Weltz, M. A., & McGwire, K. C. (2015) · Earth Surface Processes and Landforms · doi:10.1002/esp.3787 · Cited by 134
IMAGE ACQUISITION AND MODEL SELECTION FOR MULTI-VIEW STEREO
Wenzel, K., Rothermel, M., Fritsch, D., et al. (2013) · The international archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences/International archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences · doi:10.5194/isprsarchives-xl-5-w1-251-2013 · Cited by 125
Bakker, M., & Lane, S. N. (2016) · Earth Surface Processes and Landforms · doi:10.1002/esp.4085 · Cited by 121
Self-citationBrief Communication: Low-cost, on-demand aerial photogrammetry for glaciological measurement
Whitehead, K., Moorman, B. J., & Hugenholtz, C. H. (2013) · The cryosphere · doi:10.5194/tc-7-1879-2013 · Cited by 93
Freitas, C. J. (1993) · Journal of Fluids Engineering · doi:10.1115/1.2910144 · Cited by 86
Lane, S. N., & Chandler, J. H. (2003) · Earth Surface Processes and Landforms · doi:10.1002/esp.479 · Cited by 84
Self-citationIncorporating DEM Uncertainty in Coastal Inundation Mapping
Leon, J., Heuvelink, G., & Phinn, S. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0108727 · Cited by 82
Landform monitoring in active volcano by UAV and SfM-MVS technique
Nakano, T., Kamiya, I., Tobita, M., et al. (2014) · The international archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences/International archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences · doi:10.5194/isprsarchives-xl-8-71-2014 · Cited by 49
Cited by
Brown, A. G., Fallu, D., Walsh, K., Cucchiaro, S., Tarolli, P., Zhao, P., Pears, B. R., van Oost, K., Snape, L., Lang, A., et al. (2021) · Geomorphology · doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2020.107579 · Cited by 55
Masafu, C., Williams, R., Shi, X., Yuan, Q., & Trigg, M. (2022) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128217 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- James, M. R., Chandler, J. H., Eltner, A., Fraser, C., Miller, P. E., Mills, J. P., Noble, T., Robson, S., & Lane, S. N.
- Venue
- Earth Surface Processes and Landforms
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-05-23
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2081-2084
- ISSN
- 0197-9337 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9837
- OpenAlex
- W2939006302
- Cited by
- 294
- References
- 24
- FWCI
- 40.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
