Cited by 63Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental ImpactsWastewater Treatment and ReuseEnvironmental Chemistry and Analysis

Fate of trace organic compounds during vadose zone soil treatment in an onsite wastewater system

Open access
Conn, Kathleen E., Siegrist, Robert L., Barber, Larry B., Meyer, Michael T.·2009·Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry

Abstract

During onsite wastewater treatment, trace organic compounds are often present in the effluents applied to subsurface soils for advanced treatment during vadose zone percolation and groundwater recharge. The fate of the endocrine-disrupting surfactant metabolites 4-nonylphenol (NP), 4-nonylphenolmonoethoxylate (NP1EO), and 4-nonylphenolmonoethoxycarboxylate (NP1EC), metal-chelating agents ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and nitrilotriacetic acid (NTA), antimicrobial agent triclosan, stimulant caffeine, and antibiotic sulfamethoxazole during transport through an unsaturated sandy loam soil was studied at a field-scale test site. To assess the effects of effluent quality and hydraulic loading rate (HLR) on compound fate in the soil profile, two effluents (septic tank or textile biofilter) were applied at two design HLRs (2 or 8 cm/d). Chemical concentrations were determined in the two effluents and soil pore water at 60, 120, and 240 cm below the soil infiltrative surface. Concentrations of trace organic compounds in septic tank effluent were reduced by more than 90% during transport through 240 cm (often within 60 cm) of soil, likely due to sorption and biotransformation. However, the concentration of NP increased with depth in the shallow soil profile. Additional treatment of anaerobic septic tank effluent with an aerobic textile biofilter reduced effluent concentrations of many compounds, but generally did not affect any changes in pore water concentrations. The soil profile receiving septic tank effluent (vs. textile biofilter effluent) generally had greater percent removal efficiencies. EDTA, NP, NP1EC, and sulfamethoxazole were measured in soil pore water, indicating the ability of some trace organic compounds to reach shallow groundwater. Risk is highly dependent on the degree of further treatment in the saturated zone and the types and proximity of uses for the receiving groundwater environment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/etc.40

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 30 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Conn KE. 2008. Occurrence and fate of endocrine-disrupting compounds and other trace organic contaminants in onsite wastewater treatment systems. PhD thesis. Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO, USA.
  2. McKinley J. 2008. Occurrence and environmental behavior of humic substances and polysaccharides accumulating in soil wastewater treatment units. PhD thesis. Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO, USA.
  3. Martell AE, Smith RM. 1974. Critical Stability Constants, Vol. 1: Amino Acids. Plenum, New York, NY, USA.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Conn, K. E., Siegrist, R. L., Barber, L. B., & Meyer, M. T.
Affiliations
  • Colorado School of Mines (US)
  • United States Geological Survey (US)
Corresponding author
Siegrist, Robert L.
Venue
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
Published
2009-10-08
Volume
29
Issue
2
Pages
285-293
ISSN
  • 0730-7268 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-8618
OpenAlex
W2024433729
Cited by
63
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes for Water Resources
  • U.S. Geological Survey
  • Water Resources Research Institute, North Carolina State University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Environmental Chemistry and Analysis
Keywords
trace organic compounds, vadose zone, on-site wastewater treatment, septic tank effluent, 4-nonylphenol, EDTA, NTA, triclosan, caffeine, sulfamethoxazole, hydraulic loading rate, soil sorption, biotransformation, groundwater recharge, unsaturated zone transport, soil pore water, groundwater contamination risk
MeSH terms
Fresh Water, Organic Chemicals, Soil Pollutants, Waste Disposal, Fluid, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Water Purification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review