Cited by 38Environmental Toxicology and EcotoxicologyToxic Organic Pollutants ImpactEnvironmental Chemistry and Analysis

Acute toxicity of fire-retardant and foam-suppressant chemicals to Hyalella azteca (Saussure)

McDonald, Susan F, Hamilton, Steven J, Buhl, Kevin J, Heisinger, James F·1997·Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry

Abstract

Acute toxicity tests were conducted with Hyalella azteca Saussure (an amphipod) exposed in soft and hard waters to three fire retardants (Fire-Trol GTS-R, Fire-Trol LCG-R, and Phos-Chek D75-F) and two foam suppressants (Phos-Chek WD-881 and Silv-Ex). The chemicals were slightly to moderately toxic to amphipods. The most toxic chemical to amphipods in soft and hard water was Phos-Chek WD-881 (96-h mean lethal concentration [LC50] equal to 10 mg/L and 22 mg/L, respectively), and the least toxic chemical to amphipods in soft water was Fire-Trol GTS-R (96-h LC50 equal to 127 mg/L) and in hard water was Fire-Trol LCG-R (96-h LC50 equal to 535 mg/L). Concentrations of ammonia in tests with the three fire retardants and both water types were greater than reported LC50 values and probably were the major toxic component. Estimated un-ionized ammonia concentrations near the LC50 were frequently less than the reported LC50 ammonia concentrations for amphipods. The three fire retardants were more toxic in soft water than in hard water even though ammonia and un-ionized ammonia concentrations were higher in hard water tests than in soft water tests. The accidental entry of fire-fighting chemicals into aquatic environments could adversely affect aquatic invertebrates, thereby disrupting ecosystem function.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/etc.5620160706

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McDonald, S. F., Hamilton, S. J., Buhl, K. J., & Heisinger, J. F.
Affiliations
  • National Biological Service, Midwest Science Center, Yankton Field Research Station, RR 1 Box 295, Yankton, South Dakota 57078, USA
  • University of South Dakota (US)
Corresponding author
Hamilton, Steven J
Venue
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
Published
1997-07-01
Volume
16
Issue
7
Pages
1370-1376
ISSN
  • 0730-7268 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-8618
OpenAlex
W2057832425
Cited by
38
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Environmental Chemistry and Analysis
Keywords
Hyalella azteca, flame retardants, acute toxicity, Amphipoda, water hardness, un-ionized ammonia, aquatic invertebrates, LC50

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review