Cited by 26Environmental Toxicology and EcotoxicologyPesticide and Herbicide Environmental StudiesToxic Organic Pollutants Impact

Daphnia emergence: a sensitive indicator of fire-retardant stress in temporary wetlands

Angeler, David G., Martín, Silvia, Moreno, José M.·2005·Environment International

Abstract

Fire-retardant formulations are increasingly used by fire managers to control wildland fires. Their extensive use requires an assessment of their impacts in those ecosystems that could be affected by them. Recent studies indicate the potential for environmental impacts when accidentally delivered to surface waters. Yet the response of temporary wetlands, such as vernal pools, typical in Mediterranean areas, is unknown. This study reports on the emergence response of a wetland population of Daphnia curvirostris Eylmann (Cladocera, Crustacea) from sediments that were treated with a commercial fire retardant (Fire-Trol 934). Three application levels were used: 1, 3 and 5 L m(-2). The low and medium levels are in the range of manufacturer's recommendations of use in the field based on the fuel characteristics. The high level simulates local elevated concentrations that may result from inhomogeneous retardant delivery. Results indicate that emergence success decreases with increasing application rate, leading to a complete failure with application levels of 5 L m(-2). This suggests that benthic-pelagic interactions in temporary wetlands-often the primary way by which recolonization of isolated wetlands occurs-can be significantly impacted by fire retardants once they fill with fall/winter rains, thereby serving as a sensitive indicator of fire-retardant contamination. Results highlight a research need for establishing of criteria for effective, but environmentally safe use of fire retardants in the environment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.envint.2004.10.015

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 30 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Angeler, D. G., Martín, S., & Moreno, J. M.
Affiliations
University of Castilla-La Mancha (ES)
Corresponding author
Angeler, David G.
Venue
Environment International
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-05
Volume
31
Issue
4
Pages
615-620
ISSN
0160-4120 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1994310263
Cited by
26
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environment International (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
Keywords
flame retardants, Daphnia curvirostris, temporary wetlands, vernal pools, sediment contamination, benthic-pelagic interactions, recolonization, environmental indicators, wildfire management, Mediterranean wetlands
MeSH terms
Animals, Daphnia, Environment Design, Environmental Monitoring, Fires, Flame Retardants, Population Dynamics, Rain, Seasons, Ecosystem

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review