The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Pesticide residues in the aquatic environment of banana plantation areas in the North Atlantic Zone of Costa Rica
Abstract
A study of pesticide residues in surface waters and sediments was undertaken in the Suerte River Basin, Costa Rica, that drains into the Tortuguero conservation area. Samples were collected in streams, packing plants, and the Suerte River. The most frequently measured compounds in surface water samples were the fungicides thiabendazole, propiconazole, and imazalil; the nematicides terbufos and cadusafos; and the insecticide chlorpyrifos. At the conservation area, propiconazole was detected in 43% of the samples at concentrations ranging from 0.05 to 1.0 μg/L. In 25% of the samples collected at this site, a nematicide (cadusafos, carbofuran, or ethoprophos) was detected (0.06–6.2 μg/L). According to this study, most of the insecticide-nematicides analyzed pose a risk for acute or chronic toxicity to aquatic organisms based on the exposure levels and toxicity values from the literature. Ametryn, imazalil, and thiabendazole also exceeded the calculated chronic risk ratio. The most frequently detected compounds in sediments were thiabendazole, chlorpyrifos, imazalil, and propiconazole. The occurrence was higher in the packing plants and streams. Pesticides in waters and sediments of Tortuguero conservation area could pose a threat to this wetland and an additional stress to the endangered species that inhabit this area. More information is needed regarding the distribution and stability of pesticides in the lagoon system as well as of the effects of mixtures of low levels of pesticides and their degradation products on representative species of the Tortuguero ecosystem. Meanwhile, all measures to reduce the emissions of pesticides from the banana plantations and the packing plants should be taken.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Fungicides: An Overlooked Pesticide Class?
Zubrod, J. P., Bundschuh, M., Arts, G., Brühl, C. A., Imfeld, G., Knäbel, A., Payraudeau, S., Rasmussen, J. J., Rohr, J., Scharmüller, A., et al. (2019) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.8b04392 · Cited by 818
Schulz, R. (2004) · Journal of Environmental Quality · doi:10.2134/jeq2004.4190 · Cited by 502
Azole Fungicides: Occurrence and Fate in Wastewater and Surface Waters
Kahle, M., Buerge, I. J., Hauser, A., Müller, M. D., & Poiger, T. (2008) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es8009309 · Cited by 451
Emerging pollutants in the urban water cycle in Latin America: A review of the current literature
Peña-Guzmán, C., Ulloa-Sánchez, S., Mora, K., Helena-Bustos, R., Lopez-Barrera, E., Alvarez, J., & Rodriguez-Pinzón, M. (2019) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.02.100 · Cited by 411
Carazo-Rojas, E., Pérez-Rojas, G., Pérez-Villanueva, M., Chinchilla-Soto, C., Chin-Pampillo, J. S., Aguilar-Mora, P., Alpízar-Marín, M., Masís-Mora, M., Rodríguez-Rodríguez, C. E., & Vryzas, Z. (2018) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2018.06.020 · Cited by 257
Metadata
- Authors
- Castillo, L. E., Ruepert, C., & Solis, E.
- Venue
- Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-08-01
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1942-1950
- ISSN
- 0730-7268 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-8618
- OpenAlex
- W2147597898
- Cited by
- 187
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pesticide residues in the aquatic environment of banana plantation areas in the North Atlantic Zone of Costa Rica. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/etc.5620190802
- The paper
- Castillo, L. E., Ruepert, C., & Solis, E. (2000). Pesticide residues in the aquatic environment of banana plantation areas in the North Atlantic Zone of Costa Rica. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5620190802
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.