Cited by 33Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyGenetic diversity and population structureGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals

A simple and fast two‐locus quality control test to detect false positives due to batch effects in genome‐wide association studies

Open access
Lee, Sang Hong, Nyholt, Dale R., Macgregor, Stuart, Henders, Anjali K., Zondervan, Krina T., Montgomery, Grant W., Visscher, Peter M.·2010·Genetic Epidemiology

Abstract

The impact of erroneous genotypes having passed standard quality control (QC) can be severe in genome‐wide association studies, genotype imputation, and estimation of heritability and prediction of genetic risk based on single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP). To detect such genotyping errors, a simple two‐locus QC method, based on the difference in test statistic of association between single SNPs and pairs of SNPs, was developed and applied. The proposed approach could detect many problematic SNPs with statistical significance even when standard single SNP QC analyses fail to detect them in real data. Depending on the data set used, the number of erroneous SNPs that were not filtered out by standard single SNP QC but detected by the proposed approach varied from a few hundred to thousands. Using simulated data, it was shown that the proposed method was powerful and performed better than other tested existing methods. The power of the proposed approach to detect erroneous genotypes was ∼80% for a 3% error rate per SNP. This novel QC approach is easy to implement and computationally efficient, and can lead to a better quality of genotypes for subsequent genotype‐phenotype investigations. Genet. Epidemiol. 34:854–862, 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/gepi.20541

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • 996 ASD cases and 1,287 controls of European ancestry were analysed to minimize confounds due to population differences.

    “Ultimately, we analysed 996 ASD cases (876 trios) and 1,287 controls of European ancestry to minimize confounds due to population differences (Supplementary Figs 1 and 2 and Supplementary Table 1) 16 .”

    From Functional impact of global rare copy number variation in autism spectrum disorders (2010) · cites this paper as [16]

    The Methods > Real Data section describes endometriosis and WTCCC datasets, not an ASD cohort. Searches for the stated case and control counts, trios, ASD, and European ancestry found no passage in our copy that addresses the claimed sample or its selection to minimize population differences; page numbers were unavailable. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, S. H., Nyholt, D. R., Macgregor, S., Henders, A. K., Zondervan, K. T., Montgomery, G. W., & Visscher, P. M.
Affiliations
  • QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute (AU)
  • John Radcliffe Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Lee, Sang Hong
Venue
Genetic Epidemiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-11-22
Volume
34
Issue
8
Pages
854-862
ISSN
  • 0741-0395 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-2272
OpenAlex
W2156676902
Cited by
33
References
22
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genetic Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Faculty of Health; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation
Funders
Wellcome Trust (085235, 084766, 076113)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
Keywords
genotype quality control, batch effects, false positives, genotyping errors, single nucleotide polymorphisms, genome-wide association study, statistical power
MeSH terms
Genotype, Humans, Models, Genetic, Quality Control, Genome, Human, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Genome-Wide Association Study, Genetic Loci

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review