The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluating the heritability explained by known susceptibility variants: a survey of ten complex diseases
Abstract
Recently, an increasing number of susceptibility variants have been identified for complex diseases. At the same time, the concern of "missing heritability" has also emerged. There is however no unified way to assess the heritability explained by individual genetic variants for binary outcomes. A systemic and quantitative assessment of the degree of "missing heritability" for complex diseases is lacking. In this study, we measure the variance in liability explained by individual variants, which can be directly interpreted as the locus-specific heritability. The method is extended to deal with haplotypes, multi-allelic markers, multi-locus genotypes, and markers in linkage disequilibrium. Methods to estimate the standard error and confidence interval are proposed. To assess our current level of understanding of the genetic basis of complex diseases, we conducted a survey of 10 diseases, evaluating the total variance explained by the known variants. The diseases under evaluation included Alzheimer's disease, bipolar disorder, breast cancer, coronary artery disease, Crohn's disease, prostate cancer, schizophrenia, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes. The median total variance explained across the 10 diseases was 9.81%, while the median variance explained per associated SNP was around 0.25%. Our results suggest that a substantial proportion of heritability remains unexplained for the diseases under study. Programs to implement the methodologies described in this paper are available at http://sites.google.com/site/honcheongso/software/varexp.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Using a model that assumes an underlying normally distributed but unobserved disease risk score or liability49, the nineteen loci described here account for between 10% (if AMD prevalence is close to 1%) and 30% (if AMD prevalence is closer to 10%) of the variability in disease risk (corresponding to 15–65% of the total genetic contribution to AMD).”
From Seven new loci associated with age-related macular degeneration (2013) · cites this paper as [49]
Citations
Cites
An Introduction to the Bootstrap
Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1994) · doi:10.1201/9780429246593 · Cited by 40,500
An Introduction to the Bootstrap
Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1993) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-4541-9 · Cited by 21,230
Genome-wide association study of 14,000 cases of seven common diseases and 3,000 shared controls
The Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium, Management Committee, Burton, P. R., Clayton, D. G., Cardon, L. R., Craddock, N., Deloukas, P., Duncanson, A., Kwiatkowski, D. P., McCarthy, M. I., et al. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05911 · Cited by 9,442
Finding the missing heritability of complex diseases
Manolio, T. A., Collins, F. S., Cox, N. J., Goldstein, D. B., Hindorff, L. A., Hunter, D. J., McCarthy, M. I., Ramos, E. M., Cardon, L. R., Chakravarti, A., et al. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08494 · Cited by 8,336
Common polygenic variation contributes to risk of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder
The International Schizophrenia Consortium (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08185 · Cited by 4,821
Hindorff, L. A., Sethupathy, P., Junkins, H. A., Ramos, E. M., Mehta, J. P., Collins, F. S., & Manolio, T. A. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0903103106 · Cited by 4,013
Better Bootstrap Confidence Intervals
Efron, B. (1987) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1987.10478410 · Cited by 3,462
The Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium, U.K.
Mossman, K. (2008) · Scientific American · doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0108-42a · Cited by 2,714
Genome-wide association defines more than 30 distinct susceptibility loci for Crohn's disease
the NIDDK IBD Genetics Consortium, Barrett, J. C., the Belgian-French IBD Consortium, the Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium, Hansoul, S., Nicolae, D. L., Cho, J. H., Duerr, R. H., Rioux, J. D., Brant, S. R., et al. (2008) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.175 · Cited by 2,593
Systematic meta-analyses of Alzheimer disease genetic association studies: the AlzGene database
Bertram, L., McQueen, M. B., Mullin, K., Blacker, D., & Tanzi, R. E. (2007) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1934 · Cited by 1,857
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Liu, J. Z., van Sommeren, S., Huang, H., Ng, S. C., Alberts, R., Takahashi, A., Ripke, S., Lee, J. C., Jostins, L., Shah, T., et al. (2015) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3359 · Cited by 2,603
A comprehensive 1000 Genomes–based genome-wide association meta-analysis of coronary artery disease
the CARDIoGRAMplusC4D Consortium (2015) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3396 · Cited by 2,447
Malik, R., Chauhan, G., Traylor, M., Sargurupremraj, M., Okada, Y., Mishra, A., Rutten‐Jacobs, L. C. A., Giese, A., van der Laan, S. W., Grétarsdóttir, S., et al. (2018) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-018-0058-3 · Cited by 1,583
Fritsche, L. G., Igl, W., Bailey, J. N. C., Grassmann, F., Sengupta, S., Bragg-Gresham, J. L., Burdon, K. P., Hebbring, S. J., Wen, C., Gorski, M., et al. (2016) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3448 · Cited by 1,544
Bentham, J., Morris, D. L., Graham, D. S. C., Pinder, C. L., Tombleson, P., Behrens, T. W., Martin, J. J., Fairfax, B. P., Knight, J. C., Chen, L., et al. (2015) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3434 · Cited by 1,004
Metadata
- Authors
- So, H.-C., Gui, A. H. S., Cherny, S. S., & Sham, P. C.
- Affiliations
- University of Hong Kong (HK)
- Corresponding author
- Sham, Pak C.
- Venue
- Genetic Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-03-03
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 310-317
- ISSN
- 0741-0395 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2128416240
- Cited by
- 289
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 40
- FWCI
- 22.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Genetic Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust
- Croucher Foundation
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
- Keywords
- missing heritability, complex diseases, single nucleotide polymorphisms, haplotypes, linkage disequilibrium, multilocus genotypes, genetic risk variants, Alzheimer's disease, bipolar disorder, breast cancer, coronary artery disease, Crohn's disease, prostate cancer, schizophrenia, systemic lupus erythematosus, type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes
- MeSH terms
- Alleles, Female, Genetic Markers, Genotype, Haplotypes, Humans, Male, Models, Genetic, Genetic Variation, Models, Statistical, Linkage Disequilibrium, Statistics, Nonparametric, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genome-Wide Association Study
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
