Cited by 21Bioinformatics and Genomic NetworksGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals

PSEA: Phenotype Set Enrichment Analysis—A New Method for Analysis of Multiple Phenotypes

Open access
Ried, Janina S., Döring, Angela, Oexle, Konrad, Meisinger, Christa, Winkelmann, Juliane, Klopp, Norman, Meitinger, Thomas, Peters, Annette +3 more·2012·Genetic Epidemiology

Abstract

Most genome‐wide association studies (GWAS) are restricted to one phenotype, even if multiple related or unrelated phenotypes are available. However, an integrated analysis of multiple phenotypes can provide insight into their shared genetic basis and may improve the power of association studies. We present a new method, called “phenotype set enrichment analysis” (PSEA), which uses ideas of gene set enrichment analysis for the investigation of phenotype sets. PSEA combines statistics of univariate phenotype analyses and tests by permutation. It does not only allow analyzing predefined phenotype sets, but also to identify new phenotype sets. Apart from the application to situations where phenotypes and genotypes are available for each person, the method was adjusted to the analysis of GWAS summary statistics. PSEA was applied to data from the population‐based cohort KORA F 4 (N = 1,814) using iron‐related and blood count traits. By confirming associations previously found in large meta‐analyses on these traits, PSEA was shown to be a reliable tool. Many of these associations were not detectable by GWAS on single phenotypes in KORA F 4. Therefore, the results suggest that PSEA can be more powerful than a single phenotype GWAS for the identification of association with multiple phenotypes. PSEA is a valuable method for analysis of multiple phenotypes, which can help to understand phenotype networks. Its flexible design enables both the use of prior knowledge and the generation of new knowledge on connection of multiple phenotypes. A software program for PSEA based on GWAS results is available upon request.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/gepi.21617

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ried, J. S., Döring, A., Oexle, K., Meisinger, C., Winkelmann, J., Klopp, N., Meitinger, T., Peters, A., Suhre, K., Wichmann, H. ‐., & Gieger, C.
Affiliations
  • Helmholtz Munich (DE)
  • Technical University of Munich (DE)
Corresponding author
Gieger, Christian
Venue
Genetic Epidemiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-04
Volume
36
Issue
3
Pages
244-252
ISSN
  • 0741-0395 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-2272
OpenAlex
W1594811851
Cited by
21
References
26
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genetic Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • mediaTUM – the media and publications repository of the Technical University Munich (Technical University Munich) (submittedVersion)
  • Site cant be reached (submittedVersion)
  • OPUS (Augsburg University) (submittedVersion)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
  • Helmholtz Zentrum München
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
Keywords
multiple phenotypes, gene set enrichment analysis, genome-wide association study, GWAS summary statistics, statistical power
MeSH terms
Blood Proteins, Erythrocytes, Genotype, Humans, Models, Genetic, Phenotype, Software, Cohort Studies, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Genome-Wide Association Study

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review