Cited by 113Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and AnimalsGenetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities

How to Include Chromosome X in Your Genome‐Wide Association Study

Open access
König, Inke R., Loley, Christina, Erdmann, Jeanette, Ziegler, Andreas·2014·Genetic Epidemiology

Abstract

In current genome‐wide association studies (GWAS), the analysis is usually focused on autosomal variants only, and the sex chromosomes are often neglected. Recently, a number of technical hurdles have been described that add to a reluctance of including chromosome X in a GWAS, including complications in genotype calling, imputation, and selection of test statistics. To overcome this, we provide a “how to” guide for analyzing X chromosomal data within a standard GWAS. Following a general pipeline for GWAS, we highlight the steps in which the X chromosome requires specific attention, and we give tentative advice for each of these. Through this, we show that by selection of sensible algorithms and parameter settings, the inclusion of chromosome X in GWAS is manageable. Closing this gap is expected to further elucidate the genetic background of complex diseases, especially of those with sex‐specific features.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/gepi.21782

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
König, I. R., Loley, C., Erdmann, J., & Ziegler, A.
Affiliations
  • University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (DE)
  • Institute for Integrative and Experimental Genomics (DE)
Corresponding author
König, Inke R.
Venue
Genetic Epidemiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-01-09
Volume
38
Issue
2
Pages
97-103
ISSN
  • 0741-0395 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-2272
OpenAlex
W2010227703
Cited by
113
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2
FWCI
3.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genetic Epidemiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • German Science Foundation (KO 2250/4-1)
  • German Science Foundation and the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF)
  • German National Genome Research Network (01GS0417, 01GS0832)
  • FP6 and FP7 EU (LSHM-CT-2006-037593)
  • ENGAGE (201413)
  • BMBF/ANR
  • German Science Foundation Excellence Cluster “Inflammation (HEALTH-2011-278913)
  • German Ministry of Education and Research (01KU0908A, 01KU0908B)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities
Keywords
X chromosome, sex chromosomes, genome-wide association study, genotype calling, imputation, test statistics, complex diseases, sex differences
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Female, Genotype, Humans, Male, Chromosomes, Human, X, Genome-Wide Association Study

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review