Cited by 1,443Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyCognitive Abilities and TestingGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals

Genome-wide association meta-analysis in 269,867 individuals identifies new genetic and functional links to intelligence

Open access
Savage, Jeanne E., Jansen, Philip R., Stringer, Sven, Watanabe, Kyoko, Bryois, Julien, de Leeuw, Christiaan A., Nagel, Mats, Awasthi, Swapnil +109 more·2018·Nature Genetics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Intelligence is highly heritable 1 and a major determinant of human health and well-being 2. Recent genome-wide meta-analyses have identified 24 genomic loci linked to variation in intelligence 3-7, but much about its genetic underpinnings remains to be discovered. Here, we present a large-scale genetic association study of intelligence (n = 269,867), identifying 205 associated genomic loci (190 new) and 1,016 genes (939 new) via positional mapping, expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL) mapping, chromatin interaction mapping, and gene-based association analysis. We find enrichment of genetic effects in conserved and coding regions and associations with 146 nonsynonymous exonic variants. Associated genes are strongly expressed in the brain, specifically in striatal medium spiny neurons and hippocampal pyramidal neurons. Gene set analyses implicate pathways related to nervous system development and synaptic structure. We confirm previous strong genetic correlations with multiple health-related outcomes, and Mendelian randomization analysis results suggest protective effects of intelligence for Alzheimer's disease and ADHD and bidirectional causation with pleiotropic effects for schizophrenia. These results are a major step forward in understanding the neurobiology of cognitive function as well as genetically related neurological and psychiatric disorders.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41588-018-0152-6

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

34 of 45 cited sources checked · 15 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    The universality of g is supported.

    “supporting the universality of g 15,16”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [15] Deary, I. J., Penke, L. & Johnson, W. The neuroscience of human intelligence differences. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 11, 201–211 (2010). source
    • cites [16] Deary, I. J. Intelligence. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 63, 453–482 (2012). source
  • Findingown data

    The LD score intercept was 1.08 (s.e. = 0.02).

    “a linkage disequilibrium (LD) score intercept 17 of 1.08 (s.e.= 0.02)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [17] Bulik-Sullivan, B. K. et al. LD Score regression distinguishes confounding from polygenicity in genome-wide association studies. Nat. Genet. 47, 291–295 (2015). source
  • Interpretationown data

    Most of the inflation (λGC = 1.92) could be explained by polygenic signal.

    “indicated that most of the inflation (λ GC = 1.92) could be explained by polygenic signal 6”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [6] Trampush, J. W. et al. GWAS meta-analysis reveals novel loci and genetic correlates for general cognitive function: a report from the COGENT consortium. Mol. Psychiatry 22, 336–345 (2017). source

      In Results, under “GWAS of general cognitive function,” the paper says polygenicity accounted for most of the increase in the mean χ² statistic. But it reports λGC = 1.12, not 1.92. (LLM, conf=0.92)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Findingown data

    The regulation of synapse structure or activity Gene Ontology gene set was significantly associated with intelligence (P = 5.42 × 10^-6).

    “regulation of synapse structure or activity (P = 5.42 × 10 -6 )”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [26] Ashburner, M. et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat. Genet. 25, 25–29 (2000). source

      The passages headed “A dynamic gene ontology” and “Examples of GO annotation” describe the ontology and its use for gene annotation, not an association with intelligence. A search of our copy for the named synapse term, intelligence, and the reported P value found no passage addressing this result. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Findingown data

    The neurogenesis Gene Ontology gene set was significantly associated with intelligence (P = 4.78 × 10^-7).

    “neurogenesis (P = 4.78 × 10 -7 )”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [26] Ashburner, M. et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat. Genet. 25, 25–29 (2000). source

      The Abstract describes the Gene Ontology as a vocabulary for annotating genes, but does not report an association between a neurogenesis gene set and intelligence. Searches for neurogenesis, intelligence, and the stated P value found no passage addressing that result in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 40
  • May combine two claims. 20
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Intelligence has been associated with a wide variety of human behaviors and brain anatomy.

    “Intelligence has been associated with a wide variety of human behaviors 15 and brain anatomy 27”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [15] Deary, I. J., Penke, L. & Johnson, W. The neuroscience of human intelligence differences. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 11, 201–211 (2010). source
    • cites [27] Posthuma, D. et al. The association between brain volume and intelligence is of genetic origin. Nat. Neurosci. 5, 83–84 (2002). source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Recent genome-wide meta-analyses have identified 24 genomic loci linked to variation in intelligence.

    “Recent genome-wide metaanalyses have identified 24 genomic loci linked to variation in intelligence 3-7”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim5 of 5 sources checked
    • cites [3] Davies, G. et al. Genetic contributions to variation in general cognitive function: a meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies in the CHARGE consortium (N = 53949). Mol. Psychiatry 20, 183–192 (2015). source

      The Results report 13 genome-wide significant SNPs in three genomic regions associated with general cognitive function. This supports the claim that a genome-wide meta-analysis identified linked regions, but this paper does not establish the cited sentence’s total of 24 loci across multiple analyses. (LLM, conf=0.90)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [4] Davies, G. et al. Genome-wide association study of cognitive functions and educational attainment in UK Biobank (N = 112 151). Mol. Psychiatry 21, 758–767 (2016). source

      The Introduction (page unavailable) reports genome-wide significant associations with general cognitive function, and the Results section on verbal–numerical reasoning (page unavailable) identifies three associated genomic regions. These passages support the link between genomic loci and cognitive variation, but the paper does not establish the claimed total of 24 loci identified by recent meta-analyses. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [5] Sniekers, S. et al. Genome-wide association meta-analysis of 78,308 individuals identifies new loci and genes influencing human intelligence. Nat. Genet. 49, 1107–1112 (2017). source

      The Letters section reports that this genome-wide meta-analysis identified loci associated with intelligence, supporting the general point. It reports 18 independent significant loci, not 24; the cited paper alone therefore does not substantiate the sentence’s total across multiple studies. No page number is supplied in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [6] Trampush, J. W. et al. GWAS meta-analysis reveals novel loci and genetic correlates for general cognitive function: a report from the COGENT consortium. Mol. Psychiatry 22, 336–345 (2017). source

      The Results (GWAS of general cognitive function; page unavailable) report two genome-wide-significant loci, supporting the claim that a meta-analysis identified loci associated with cognitive performance. The Abstract reports that 24 is the number of cohorts studied, not the number of loci identified; it also reports three additional loci from gene-based analysis. This source therefore does not support the count of 24 genomic loci. (LLM, conf=0.90)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [7] Zabaneh, D. et al. A genome-wide association study for extremely high intelligence. Mol. Psychiatry 23, 1226–1232 (2018). source

      The Results (Analysis of genome-wide SNPs; page unavailable) identify three significant SNPs at one ADAM12 locus, and the Introduction discusses earlier genome-wide studies of intelligence. Neither passage supports the specific claim that meta-analyses identified 24 loci. (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Intelligence is a major determinant of human health and well-being.

    “a major determinant of human health and well-being 2”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [2] Wraw, C., Deary, I. J., Gale, C. R. & Der, G. Intelligence in youth and health at age 50. Intelligence 53, 23–32 (2015). source

      The Abstract’s Results & conclusion and the Discussion (page numbers not provided) link higher intelligence in youth with better physical health and fewer chronic conditions at age 50. They describe associations, not intelligence as a major determinant of human health generally, and the study does not establish an effect on well-being. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Previous studies implicate bidirectional causal effects between cognitive ability and educational attainment.

    “Such findings are consistent with previous studies implicating bidirectional causal effects 30,31”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [30] Johnson, W., Deary, I. J. & Iacono, W. G. Genetic and environmental transactions underlying educational attainment. Intelligence 37, 466–478 (2009). source
    • cites [31] Richards, M. & Sacker, A. Is education causal? Yes. Int. J. Epidemiol. 40, 516–518 (2011). source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Conserved and regulatory regions have previously been implicated in cognitive functioning, but coding regions have not.

    “Conserved and regulatory regions have previously been implicated in cognitive functioning 22 , but coding regions have not.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [22] Hill, W. D. et al. Molecular genetic aetiology of general cognitive function is enriched in evolutionarily conserved regions. Transl. Psychiatry 6, e980 (2016). source

      The Results (Partitioned heritability; page unavailable) report enrichment for cognitive-function heritability in conserved regions and in regulatory annotations, including weak enhancers and DNase hypersensitivity sites. The paper does not establish the broader claim that coding regions have not been implicated in cognitive functioning. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Previous reports support both a causal link and genetic overlap between intelligence and schizophrenia.

    “A number of previous reports support both a causal link and genetic overlap between these phenotypes 32,33”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [32] Kendler, K. S., Ohlsson, H., Sundquist, J. & Sundquist, K. IQ and schizophrenia in a Swedish national sample: their causal relationship and the interaction of IQ with genetic risk. Am. J. Psychiatry 172, 259–265 (2015). source
    • cites [33] Le Hellard, S. et al. Identification of gene loci that overlap between schizophrenia and educational attainment. Schizophr. Bull. 43, 654–664 (2017). source

      The Discussion and the ‘Genetic Overlap of SCZ and Educational Attainment’ section report genetic overlap between general cognition and schizophrenia; page numbers are unavailable in our copy. The paper does not establish a causal link between intelligence and schizophrenia, so it supports only the genetic-overlap part of the claim. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation

    A false discovery rate of 1 × 10-5 was used to define significant chromatin interactions, based on previous recommendations modified for the cell lines used.

    “We used an FDR of 1 × 10 -5 to define significant interactions, based on previous recommendations 51 modified to account for the differences in cell lines used here.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [51] Schmitt, A. D. et al. A compendium of chromatin contact maps reveals spatially active regions in the human genome. Cell Rep. 17, 2042–2059 (2016). source

      The Experimental Procedures ('Identification of significant Hi-C contacts') support using an FDR threshold to define significant contacts, but specify FDR < 1 × 10⁻⁶, not 1 × 10⁻⁵. The Results ('Identification of Frequently Interacting Regions') discuss variation between samples, but do not describe the citing authors’ cell-line-specific modification. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Brain-cell-type expression data used to construct the cell-type gene sets were drawn from single-cell RNA-seq data from mouse brains.

    “Briefly, brain-cell-type expression data were drawn from single-cell RNA-seq data from mouse brains.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [53] Skene, N. G. et al. Genetic identification of brain cell types underlying schizophrenia. Nat. Genet. 50, 825–833 (2018). source
    • cites [37] Coleman, J.R.I. et al. Biological annotation of genetic loci associated with intelligence in a meta-analysis of 87,740 individuals. Mol. Psychiatry https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-018-0040-6 (2018). source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Comparison with previous GWAS supported these correlations, showing numerous shared genetic variants across phenotypes.

    “Comparison with previous GWAS 28 supported these correlations, showing numerous shared genetic variants across phenotypes”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [28] MacArthur, J. et al. The new NHGRI-EBI Catalog of published genome-wide association studies (GWAS Catalog). Nucleic Acids Res. 45(D1), D896–D901 (2017). source

      The Introduction (page not provided) says GWAS Catalog data have been used to find evidence of pleiotropy, which supports the general idea of genetic associations across traits. It does not report the citing authors’ comparison with previous GWAS, confirm their correlations, or show that numerous variants were shared across the phenotypes they studied. (LLM, conf=0.80)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    A CADD score above 12.37 is the threshold for a variant to be potentially pathogenic.

    “A CADD score above 12.37 is the threshold to be potentially pathogenic 23 .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [23] Kircher, M. et al. A general framework for estimating the relative pathogenicity of human genetic variants. Nat. Genet. 46, 310–315 (2014). source

      The Technical Report says CADD scores rank known pathogenic variants highly, but it does not establish 12.37 as a pathogenicity threshold. It also says C-scores cannot be precisely calibrated to the likelihood that a variant is pathogenic and are best interpreted as indicating likelihood of deleteriousness. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The estimated GSMR causal effect coefficients (bxy) are approximately equal to the natural log odds ratio for a case-control trait.

    “The estimated causal effect coefficients (b xy ) are approximately equal to the natural log odds ratio (OR) for a case-control trait 29 .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [29] Zhu, Z. et al. Causal associations between risk factors and common diseases inferred from GWAS summary data. Nat. Commun. 9, 224 (2018). source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The NCP-weighting method improves power when using an extreme case sampling design such as HiQ and provides a comparable metric to combine information from different analytic designs while accounting for differences in power/effective sample size.

    “This method improves power when using an extreme case sampling design such as that in HiQ 35 and provides a comparable metric with which to combine information from different analytic designs while accounting for their differences in power/effective sample size.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [35] Peloso, G. M. et al. Phenotypic extremes in rare variant study designs. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 24, 924–930 (2016). source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductcitation

    Independently associated loci from the meta-analysis were defined using FUMA.

    “Independently associated loci from the metaanalysis were defined using FUMA 24 (see URLs), an online platform for functional mapping of genetic variants.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [24] Watanabe, K., Taskesen, E., van Bochoven, A. & Posthuma, D. Functional mapping and annotation of genetic associations with FUMA. Nat. Commun. 8, 1826 (2017). source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Convergent evidence of strong association (z = 9.49) and the highest observed probability of a deleterious protein effect (CADD score = 34) were found for rs13107325.

    “Convergent evidence of strong association (z = 9.49) and the highest observed probability of a deleterious protein effect (CADD 23 score = 34) were found for rs13107325.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [23] Kircher, M. et al. A general framework for estimating the relative pathogenicity of human genetic variants. Nat. Genet. 46, 310–315 (2014). source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    GSMR can help differentiate the likely causal direction of association between two traits but cannot make any statement about the intermediate mechanisms involved in any potential causal process.

    “This method can help differentiate the likely causal direction of association between two traits but cannot make any statement about the intermediate mechanisms involved in any potential causal process.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [29] Zhu, Z. et al. Causal associations between risk factors and common diseases inferred from GWAS summary data. Nat. Commun. 9, 224 (2018). source

      The Methods section describes GSMR as testing whether an exposure causally affects an outcome, and the Results section uses forward and reverse GSMR analyses to assess direction. The Results also say it is difficult to distinguish whether an effect is mediated by other risk factors or driven by them. But the paper does examine associations among risk factors and conditional effects, so the categorical claim that GSMR cannot make any statement about intermediate mechanisms overstates its stated limitation. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The effect of non-pleiotropic SNPs on an exposure is related to their effect on the outcome in an independent sample only via mediation through the phenotypic causal pathway.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    FUMA contains Hi-C data for 14 tissue types from the study of Schmitt et al.

    “FUMA currently contains Hi-C data for 14 tissue types from the study of Schmitt et al. 51 .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [51] Schmitt, A. D. et al. A compendium of chromatin contact maps reveals spatially active regions in the human genome. Cell Rep. 17, 2042–2059 (2016). source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Age-stratified meta-analyses indicated comparable heritability across age groups, hSNP2 = 0.19-0.22.

    “comparable heritability across age groups, as captured by the SNPs included in the analysis (h SNP 2 = 0.19-0.22)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Conditional analysis indicated three independent associations-regulation of nervous system development, central nervous system neuron differentiation, and regulation of synapse structure or activity-that together accounted for the associations of the other sets.

    “Conditional analysis indicated that there were three independent associations-regulation of nervous system development, central nervous system neuron differentiation, and regulation of synapse structure or activity-that together accounted for the associations of the other sets.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    350 of the GWGAS genes were also mapped by FUMA.

    “of which 350 were also mapped by FUMA”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The FUMA-mapped genes were enriched for brain tissue expression and several regulatory biological gene sets.

    “The FUMA-mapped genes were enriched for brain tissue expression and several regulatory biological gene sets”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Cross-locus interactions implicated ELAVL2, PTCH1, ATF4, FBXL17, and MAN2A1 in the left ventricle of the heart, SATB2 in liver tissue, and MEF2C in five tissues.

    “Cross-locus interactions implicated ELAVL2, PTCH1, ATF4, FBXL17, and MAN2A1 in the left ventricle of the heart, SATB2 in liver tissue, and MEF2C in five tissues.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    rs13107325 is a missense mutation (MAF = 0.065, P = 2.23 × 10^-21) in SLC39A8 and was the lead SNP in locus 71.

    “This missense mutation (MAF = 0.065, P = 2.23 × 10 -21 ) in SLC39A8 was the lead SNP in locus 71”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Twin and family studies show strong genetic correlations across diverse cognitive domains, suggesting pleiotropy, and across levels of ability.

    “twin and family studies show strong genetic correlations across diverse cognitive domains 11 , suggesting pleiotropy, and across levels of ability 11”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [11] Plomin, R. & Kovas, Y. Generalist genes and learning disabilities. Psychol. Bull. 131, 592–617 (2005). source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    The variance common across cognitive tasks can be modeled as a latent factor denoted as g (the general factor of intelligence).

    “the variance common across cognitive tasks can be modeled as a latent factor denoted as g (the general factor of intelligence) 9,10”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [9] Carroll, J. B. Human Cognitive Abilities: A Survey of Factor-Analytic Studies. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1993). source
    • cites [10] Spearman, C. “General intelligence,” objectively determined and measured. Am. J. Psychol. 15, 201–292 (1904). source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The Bonferroni-corrected significance threshold for the 56 functional annotation categories in the stratified LD Score regression was 0.05/56 = 0.0009.

    “The Bonferroni-corrected significance threshold was 0.05/56 annotations = 0.0009.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Restricting interaction-mapped genes to those with an enhancer-promoter overlap reduced the number of genes mapped but increased the likelihood that the identified genes would have a plausible biological function.

    “This reduced the number of genes mapped but increased the likelihood that those identified would have a plausible biological function.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    SNP-based replication was carried out using a proxy phenotype of educational attainment in an independent sample.

    “SNP-based replication was carried out using a proxy phenotype of educational attainment in an independent sample.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    A P value threshold of 0.01 was used for HEIDI outlier detection in the GSMR analyses, which removes 1% of SNPs by chance if there is no pleiotropic effect.

    “We used a threshold P value of 0.01 for the outlier detection analysis in HEIDI, which removes 1% of SNPs by chance if there is no pleiotropic effect.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    With the exception of HiQ/HRS, all cohorts used a normally distributed single sum, mean, or factor score from a multidimensional set of cognitive performance tests as the phenotype in a covariate-adjusted GWAS using linear regression.

    “With the exception of HiQ/HRS, all cohorts extracted a single sum score, mean score, or factor score from a multidimensional set of cognitive performance tests and used this normally distributed score as the phenotype in a covariate-adjusted (for example, age, sex, ancestry principal components) GWAS using linear regression methods.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The Bonferroni-corrected significance threshold for the 38 genetic correlation tests was 0.05/38 = 1.32 × 10-3.

    “The Bonferroni-corrected significance threshold was 0.05/38 traits = 1.32 × 10 -3 .”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Many of the 1,518 genes linked to intellectual disability and/or developmental delay were identified by non-GWAS sources and are not represented in the NHGRI catalog.

    “Many of these have been identified by non-GWAS sources and are not represented in the NHGRI catalog.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    Polygenic scores were calculated from leave-one-out meta-analyses in which four cohorts were separately excluded and reserved for score validation.

    “We calculated polygenic scores (PGSs) based on the SNP effect sizes of the leave-one-out meta-analyses, from which four cohorts were (separately) excluded and reserved for score validation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The X chromosome was treated separately because imputed genotypes were not available for the X chromosome in UKB and there was little overlap between UKB called genotypes and imputed data from other cohorts (n SNPs < 500).

    “The X chromosome was treated separately in the meta-analysis because imputed genotypes were not available for the X chromosome in the largest cohort (UKB), and there was little overlap between the UKB called genotypes and imputed data from other cohorts (n SNPs < 500).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Only called X-chromosome variants in UKB were included for X-chromosome analyses after X-chromosome-specific quality-control steps.

    “We therefore included only the called X-chromosome variants in UKB for these analyses after performing X-chromosome-specific quality-control steps 38 .”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [38] König, I. R., Loley, C., Erdmann, J. & Ziegler, A. How to include chromosome X in your genome-wide association study. Genet. Epidemiol. 38, 97–103 (2014). source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The Bonferroni-corrected significance threshold for the 9,494 gene sets tested by GENE2FUNC was 0.05/9,494 = 5.27 × 10-6.

    “The Bonferroni-corrected significance threshold was 0.05/9,494 gene sets = 5.27 × 10 -6 .”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    A false discovery rate of 0.05 was used to define significant eQTL associations in the gene mapping.

    “We used a false discovery rate (FDR) of 0.05 to define significant eQTL associations”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    The explained variance (ΔR2) of each polygenic score was derived from a linear model regressing the GWAS intelligence phenotype on the PGS while controlling for the same covariates as in each cohort-specific GWAS, compared to a covariates-only model.

    “The explained variance (Δ R 2 ) was derived from a linear model in which the GWAS intelligence phenotype was regressed on each PGS while controlling for the same covariates as in each cohort-specific GWAS, compared to a linear model with GWAS covariates only.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    All files were checked for data integrity and accuracy.

    “All files were checked for data integrity and accuracy.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The Bonferroni-corrected significance threshold for the 7,323 gene sets tested with MAGMA was 0.05/7,323 = 6.83 × 10-6.

    “The Bonferroni-corrected significance threshold was 0.05/7,323 gene sets = 6.83 × 10 -6 .”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    After combining all data, meta-analysis results were filtered to exclude any variants with n < 50,000.

    “After combining all data, meta-analysis results were further filtered to exclude any variants with n < 50,000.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Independent significant SNPs were defined as having a Bonferroni-corrected genome-wide significant two-tailed P < 5 × 10−8 and representing signals independent from each other at r2 < 0.6.

    “We first identified 'independent significant SNPs' , which had a Bonferroni-corrected genome-wide significant two-tailed P value (P < 5 × 10 -8 ) and represented signals that were independent from each other at r 2 < 0.6.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Indels and SNPs that were duplicated, multiallelic, monomorphic, or ambiguous (A/T or C/G with MAF > 0.4) were excluded.

    “Indels and SNPs that were duplicated, multiallelic, monomorphic, or ambiguous (A/T or C/G with MAF > 0.4) were also excluded.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The Bonferroni-corrected genome-wide significance threshold for the 18,128 genes tested in the GWGAS was 0.05/18,128 = 2.76 × 10-6.

    “The Bonferroni-corrected genome-wide significance threshold was 0.05/18,128 genes = 2.76 × 10 -6 .”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    To create independent discovery samples for polygenic score validation, meta-analyses were conducted with a leave-one-out strategy excluding each of four validation datasets.

    “To create independent discovery samples for use in polygenic score validation, we also conducted meta-analyses with a 'leave-one-out' strategy in which summary statistics from four validation datasets were each excluded from the meta-analysis”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    SNPs were filtered from further analysis if they had imputation quality (INFO/R2) < 0.6, Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium P < 5 × 10−6, study-specific minor allele count < 100, or mismatch of alleles or allele frequency difference greater than 20% from the HRC reference panel.

    “SNPs were filtered from further analysis if they met any of the following criteria: imputation quality (INFO/R 2 ) score < 0.6, Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium P < 5 × 10 -6 , study-specific minor allele frequency (MAF) corresponding to a minor allele count (MAC) < 100, and mismatch of alleles or allele frequency difference greater than 20% from the Haplotype Reference Consortium (HRC) genome reference”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [16] Deary, I. J. Intelligence. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 63, 453–482 (2012). source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Visual inspection of the distribution of summary statistics was performed, and Manhattan plots and quantile-quantile plots were created for the cleaned summary statistics from each cohort.

    “Visual inspection of the distribution of the summary statistics was performed, and Manhattan plots and quantile-quantile plots were created for the cleaned summary statistics from each cohort (Supplementary Fig. 1).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisereasoning

    Because chromatin interactions are often defined at a resolution such as 40 kb, an interacting region can span multiple genes.

    “Because chromatin interactions are often defined in a certain resolution, such as 40 kb, an interacting region can span multiple genes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Older samples were screened for cognitive decline to exclude the possibility of dementia affecting performance on cognitive tests.

    “Participants ranged from children to older adults, with older samples being screened for cognitive decline to exclude the possibility of dementia affecting performance on cognitive tests.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    A random-effects meta-analysis was included for each phase to evaluate potential heterogeneity in SNP association statistics between cohorts.

    “We additionally included a random-effects meta-analysis for each phase, as implemented in METAL, to evaluate potential heterogeneity in the SNP association statistics between cohorts.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    For each independent genomic locus, evidence for replication was defined as the lead SNP or another correlated SNP in the region being sign concordant with the corresponding intelligence meta-analysis SNP and having a two-tailed P value of association with educational attainment < 0.05/242 = 0.0002.

    “For each independent genomic locus, we considered it to be evidence for replication if the lead SNP or another correlated SNP in the region was sign concordant with the corresponding SNP in the intelligence meta-analysis and had a two-tailed P value of association with educational attainment smaller than 0.05/242 independent tests = 0.0002.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    To test replication of SNPs with educational attainment, a sign concordance test was performed for all genome-wide significant SNPs from the meta-analysis using the two-tailed exact binomial test.

    “To test replication of the SNPs with this proxy phenotype, we performed a sign concordance test for all genome-wide significant SNPs from the meta-analysis using the two-tailed exact binomial test.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
51 of 51
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The GSMR analysis assumptions (e.g., genetic instruments are valid and not horizontally pleiotropic) hold for the causal inferences.

    “We used Generalized Summary-data-based Mendelian randomization 29 to test for potential credible causal associations between intelligence and genetically correlated traits”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    A common latent g factor underlies multiple dimensions of cognitive functioning and can be indexed by the different intelligence measures used across cohorts.

    “Different measures of intelligence were assessed in each cohort but were all operationalized to index a common latent g factor underlying multiple dimensions of cognitive functioning.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The effect of non-pleiotropic SNPs on an exposure is related to their effect on the outcome in an independent sample only via mediation through the phenotypic causal pathway.

    “given the assumption that the effect of non-pleiotropic SNPs on an exposure (x) should be related to their effect on the outcome (y) in an independent sample only via mediation through the phenotypic causal pathway (b xy )”
3 of 3

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Genome-wide association studies to date suggest that hundreds to thousands of genes additively influence variation in intelligence, with the effect of any one gene being very small.

    “Most genome-wide association studies (GWAS) to date have focused on intelligence or g [234–237], and suggest that hundreds to thousands of genes additively influence variation in intelligence, with the effect of any one gene being very small (typically in GWAS, a variant has r2 < 0.05% [238]).”

    From The role of prefrontal cortex in cognitive control and executive function (2022) · cites this paper as [234]

    The paper reports 1,016 genes associated with intelligence (Abstract; page not provided), supporting the claim that many genes are involved. It also describes individually small effects for nonsynonymous SNPs (Abstract; page not provided), but does not establish that every implicated gene has a very small effect or that the genes act additively. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • ZNF638 is highly expressed in the brain, particularly in oligodendrocytes and their precursor cells, and has been implicated in large-scale genetic studies of intelligence and general cognitive ability.

    “The gene is highly expressed in the brain, particularly in oligodendrocytes and their precursor cells, and has been implicated in large-scale genetic studies of intelligence and general cognitive ability43.”

    From Locus for severity implicates CNS resilience in progression of multiple sclerosis (2023) · cites this paper as [43]

    The Letters report brain-expression and intelligence associations for groups of genes, but the passages found do not identify ZNF638 among them. A figure label lists oligodendrocytes and their precursors without linking either cell type to ZNF638. Searches for ZNF638 and its claimed cell-specific expression found no passage addressing the gene-specific claim. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Genetic variants in dysbindin-1 are strongly associated with human intelligence.

    “Genetic variants in dysbindin-1 are strongly associated with human intelligence [51].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Savage, J. E., Jansen, P. R., Stringer, S., Watanabe, K., Bryois, J., de Leeuw, C. A., Nagel, M., Awasthi, S., Barr, P. B., Coleman, J. R. I., Grasby, K. L., Hammerschlag, A. R., Kaminski, J. A., Karlsson, R., Krapohl, E., Lam, M., Nygaard, M., Reynolds, C. A., Trampush, J. W., Young, H., Zabaneh, D., Hägg, S., Hansell, N. K., Karlsson, I. K., Linnarsson, S., Montgomery, G. W., Muñoz-Manchado, A. B., Quinlan, E. B., Schumann, G., Skene, N. G., Webb, B. T., White, T., Arking, D. E., Avramopoulos, D., Bilder, R. M., Bitsios, P., Burdick, K. E., Cannon, T. D., Chiba-Falek, O., Christoforou, A., Cirulli, E. T., Congdon, E., Corvin, A., Davies, G., Deary, I. J., DeRosse, P., Dickinson, D., Djurovic, S., Donohoe, G., Conley, E. D., Eriksson, J. G., Espeseth, T., Freimer, N. A., Giakoumaki, S., Giegling, I., Gill, M., Glahn, D. C., Hariri, A. R., Hatzimanolis, A., Keller, M. C., Knowles, E., Koltai, D., Konte, B., Lahti, J., Le Hellard, S., Lencz, T., Liewald, D. C., London, E., Lundervold, A. J., Malhotra, A. K., Melle, I., Morris, D., Need, A. C., Ollier, W., Palotie, A., Payton, A., Pendleton, N., Poldrack, R. A., Räikkönen, K., Reinvang, I., Roussos, P., Rujescu, D., Sabb, F. W., Scult, M. A., Smeland, O. B., Smyrnis, N., Starr, J. M., Steen, V. M., Stefanis, N. C., Straub, R. E., Sundet, K., Tiemeier, H., Voineskos, A. N., Weinberger, D. R., Widen, E., Yu, J., Abecasis, G., Andreassen, O. A., Breen, G., Christiansen, L., Debrabant, B., Dick, D. M., Heinz, A., Hjerling-Leffler, J., Ikram, M. A., Kendler, K. S., Martin, N. G., Medland, S. E., Pedersen, N. L., Plomin, R., Polderman, T. J. C., Ripke, S., van der Sluis, S., Sullivan, P. F., Vrieze, S. I., Wright, M. J., & Posthuma, D.
Affiliations
  • Amsterdam Neuroscience (NL)
  • Erasmus MC (NL)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
  • Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute (AU)
  • Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
  • Institute of Mental Health (SG)
  • University of Southern Denmark (DK)
  • University of California, Riverside (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
Venue
Nature Genetics
Published
2018-06-25
Volume
50
Issue
7
Pages
912-919
ISSN
  • 1061-4036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1718
OpenAlex
W2809193491
Cited by
1,443
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 92 · 2025: 165 · 2024: 188 · 2023: 170 · 2022: 171 · 2021: 187 · 2020: 157 · 2019: 121 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
97.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • e-space (Manchester Metropolitan University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (submittedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
  • Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • SUNY Digital Repository Support (State University of New York System) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
Keywords
intelligence, cognitive ability, genetic loci, expression quantitative trait loci, chromatin interactions, non-synonymous mutations, brain gene expression, striatal medium spiny neurons
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Brain, Female, Humans, Intelligence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-29.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-29.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review