Genome-wide association meta-analysis in 269,867 individuals identifies new genetic and functional links to intelligence
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Intelligence is highly heritable 1 and a major determinant of human health and well-being 2. Recent genome-wide meta-analyses have identified 24 genomic loci linked to variation in intelligence 3-7, but much about its genetic underpinnings remains to be discovered. Here, we present a large-scale genetic association study of intelligence (n = 269,867), identifying 205 associated genomic loci (190 new) and 1,016 genes (939 new) via positional mapping, expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL) mapping, chromatin interaction mapping, and gene-based association analysis. We find enrichment of genetic effects in conserved and coding regions and associations with 146 nonsynonymous exonic variants. Associated genes are strongly expressed in the brain, specifically in striatal medium spiny neurons and hippocampal pyramidal neurons. Gene set analyses implicate pathways related to nervous system development and synaptic structure. We confirm previous strong genetic correlations with multiple health-related outcomes, and Mendelian randomization analysis results suggest protective effects of intelligence for Alzheimer's disease and ADHD and bidirectional causation with pleiotropic effects for schizophrenia. These results are a major step forward in understanding the neurobiology of cognitive function as well as genetically related neurological and psychiatric disorders.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
34 of 45 cited sources checked · 15 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
The universality of g is supported.
“supporting the universality of g 15,16”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked - Findingown data
The LD score intercept was 1.08 (s.e. = 0.02).
“a linkage disequilibrium (LD) score intercept 17 of 1.08 (s.e.= 0.02)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [17] Bulik-Sullivan, B. K. et al. LD Score regression distinguishes confounding from polygenicity in genome-wide association studies. Nat. Genet. 47, 291–295 (2015). source
- Interpretationown data
Most of the inflation (λGC = 1.92) could be explained by polygenic signal.
“indicated that most of the inflation (λ GC = 1.92) could be explained by polygenic signal 6”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [6] Trampush, J. W. et al. GWAS meta-analysis reveals novel loci and genetic correlates for general cognitive function: a report from the COGENT consortium. Mol. Psychiatry 22, 336–345 (2017). source
In Results, under “GWAS of general cognitive function,” the paper says polygenicity accounted for most of the increase in the mean χ² statistic. But it reports λGC = 1.12, not 1.92. (LLM, conf=0.92)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingown data
The regulation of synapse structure or activity Gene Ontology gene set was significantly associated with intelligence (P = 5.42 × 10^-6).
“regulation of synapse structure or activity (P = 5.42 × 10 -6 )”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [26] Ashburner, M. et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat. Genet. 25, 25–29 (2000). source
The passages headed “A dynamic gene ontology” and “Examples of GO annotation” describe the ontology and its use for gene annotation, not an association with intelligence. A search of our copy for the named synapse term, intelligence, and the reported P value found no passage addressing this result. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingown data
The neurogenesis Gene Ontology gene set was significantly associated with intelligence (P = 4.78 × 10^-7).
“neurogenesis (P = 4.78 × 10 -7 )”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [26] Ashburner, M. et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat. Genet. 25, 25–29 (2000). source
The Abstract describes the Gene Ontology as a vocabulary for annotating genes, but does not report an association between a neurogenesis gene set and intelligence. Searches for neurogenesis, intelligence, and the stated P value found no passage addressing that result in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
MAGMA competitive P values are more robust to type I error than self-contained tests that only test a gene set against the null hypothesis of no association.
“This method is more robust to type I error than self-contained tests that only test for association of a gene set against the null hypothesis of no association 25 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [25] de Leeuw, C. A., Mooij, J. M., Heskes, T. & Posthuma, D. MAGMA: generalized gene-set analysis of GWAS data. PLoS Comput. Biol. 11, e1004219 (2015). source
- Findingown data
The positive regulation of nervous system development Gene Ontology gene set was significantly associated with intelligence (P = 1.00 × 10^-6).
“positive regulation of nervous system development (P = 1.00 × 10 -6 )”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [26] Ashburner, M. et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat. Genet. 25, 25–29 (2000). source
The paper’s Abstract describes the Gene Ontology as a controlled vocabulary for annotating genes, but it does not report an association between a nervous-system-development gene set and intelligence. Searches for the specific term, intelligence, and the stated P value found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Study design and conductown data
GWAS of educational attainment was conducted in a non-overlapping European subset of UKB (n = 188,435) who did not complete the intelligence measure.
“We conducted GWAS of educational attainment, an outcome with a high genetic correlation with intelligence 5 , in a non-overlapping European subset of the UKB sample (n = 188,435) who did not complete the intelligence measure.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [5] Sniekers, S. et al. Genome-wide association meta-analysis of 78,308 individuals identifies new loci and genes influencing human intelligence. Nat. Genet. 49, 1107–1112 (2017). source
- Findingown data
The regulation of nervous system development Gene Ontology gene set was significantly associated with intelligence (P = 9.30 × 10^-7).
“regulation of nervous system development (P = 9.30 × 10 -7 )”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [26] Ashburner, M. et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat. Genet. 25, 25–29 (2000). source
The paper describes the Gene Ontology and its gene annotations (Abstract), but our copy does not report an association between a nervous-system-development gene set and intelligence. Searches for the gene-set term, intelligence, and the stated P value found no passage addressing that result. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingown data
The neuron differentiation Gene Ontology gene set was significantly associated with intelligence (P = 4.82 × 10^-6).
“neuron differentiation (P = 4.82 × 10 -6 )”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [26] Ashburner, M. et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat. Genet. 25, 25–29 (2000). source
The paper’s Abstract describes the Gene Ontology as a controlled vocabulary for annotating genes, not a test of association with intelligence. Searches for “neuron differentiation” and the stated P value found no passage reporting that association. (LLM, conf=0.77)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingown data
The central nervous system neuron differentiation Gene Ontology gene set was significantly associated with intelligence (P = 3.31 × 10^-6).
“central nervous system neuron differentiation (P = 3.31 × 10 -6 )”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [26] Ashburner, M. et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat. Genet. 25, 25–29 (2000). source
The Abstract describes Gene Ontology as a vocabulary for annotating genes, but does not report an association between central nervous system neuron differentiation and intelligence. Searches for the named gene set, intelligence, and the reported P value found no passage addressing that result. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingown data
In the meta-analysis, 12,110 variants indexed by 242 lead SNPs reached genome-wide significance (P < 5 × 10^-8).
“12,110 variants indexed by 242 lead SNPs in approximate linkage equilibrium (r 2 < 0.1) reached genome-wide significance (P < 5 × 10 -8 )”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
These variants were located in 205 distinct genomic loci.
“These were located in 205 distinct genomic loci”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Genetic correlations between cohorts were considerable (mean = 0.67).
“genetic correlations (r g ) between cohorts were considerable (mean = 0.67)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Age-stratified meta-analyses indicated high genetic correlations (r_g > 0.62) across age groups.
“Age-stratified meta-analyses indicated high genetic correlations (r g > 0.62)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There was no evidence of heterogeneity between cohorts in the SNP associations.
“there was no evidence of heterogeneity between cohorts in the SNP associations”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The full-sample hSNP2 was 0.19 (s.e. = 0.01).
“The full-sample h SNP 2 was 0.19 (standard error (s.e.) = 0.01)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
We confirmed high genetic correlation (r_g = 0.73) between intelligence and educational attainment.
“We confirmed this high genetic correlation (r g = 0.73)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
GWGAS analysis identified 507 associated genes.
“GWGAS analysis identified 507 associated genes”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
We observed negative genetic correlations with schizophrenia (r_g = -0.21, P = 3.82 × 10^-17).
“schizophrenia (r g = -0.21,P = 3.82 × 10 -17 )”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Functional annotation of candidate SNPs showed that these were mostly intronic or intergenic.
“showed that these were mostly intronic or intergenic”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
eQTL gene mapping matched cis-eQTL SNPs to 684 genes whose expression levels they influence.
“eQTL gene mapping matched cis-eQTL SNPs to 684 genes whose expression levels they influence”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
We observed replication for 48 loci using educational attainment.
“with replication for 48 loci”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
We observed sign concordance with educational attainment for 93% of genome-wide significant SNPs (P < 1 × 10^-300).
“observed sign concordance with educational attainment for 93% of genome-wide significant SNPs (P < 1 × 10 -300 )”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Low enrichment (87 of 1,518 genes, P = 0.05) was found for genes previously linked to intellectual disability or developmental delay.
“Low enrichment (87 of 1,518 genes, P = 0.05) was found for genes previously linked to intellectual disability or developmental delay”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Multiple interactions in multiple tissue types were seen for a cluster of eight genes on chromosome 6 encoding zinc-finger proteins and histones.
“Multiple interactions in multiple tissue types were seen for a cluster of eight genes on chromosome 6 encoding zinc-finger proteins and histones.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
This resulted in 859 unique mapped genes.
“This resulted in 859 unique mapped genes”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Chromatin interaction mapping annotated SNPs to 227 genes on the basis of 3D DNA-DNA interactions.
“chromatin interaction mapping annotated SNPs to 227 genes on the basis of 3D DNA-DNA interactions”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The ancestral C allele of rs13107325 was associated with higher scores on intelligence measures.
“the ancestral C allele was associated with higher scores on intelligence measures”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
We observed negative genetic correlations with ADHD (r_g = -0.36, P = 4.58 × 10^-23).
“negative genetic correlations with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD; r g = -0.36,P = 4.58 × 10 -23 )”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In brain single-cell expression gene set analyses, we found significant associations of cortical somatosensory pyramidal neurons (P = 2.72 × 10^-9).
“cortical somatosensory pyramidal neurons (P = 2.72 × 10 -9 )”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The study identified 939 new associated genes.
“and 1,016 genes (939 new)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
We observed enrichment for heritability of SNPs in H3K9ac histone regions/peaks (P < 6.26 × 10^-5).
“acetylated Lys9 of histone H3 (H3K9ac) histone regions/peaks (P < 6.26 × 10 -5 )”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In brain single-cell expression gene set analyses, we found significant associations of hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons (P = 5.67 × 10^-11).
“hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons (P = 5.67 × 10 -11 )”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Fifteen genes are particularly notable as they are implicated via chromatin interactions between two independent genomic risk loci.
“Fifteen genes are particularly notable as they are implicated via chromatin interactions between two independent genomic risk loci”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The study identified 190 new genomic loci associated with intelligence.
“identifying 205 associated genomic loci (190 new)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Using PGS prediction, the current results explain up to 5.2% of the variance in intelligence in four independent samples.
“the current results explain up to 5.2% of the variance in intelligence in four independent samples”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
We observed negative genetic correlations with depressive symptoms (r_g = -0.27, P = 6.20 × 10^-10).
“depressive symptoms (r g = -0.27,P = 6.20 × 10 -10 )”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The study replicated previous associations with 15 loci and 77 genes.
“replicating previous associations with 15 loci and 77 genes”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
We observed negative genetic correlations with Alzheimer's disease (r_g = -0.27, P = 2.03 × 10^-5).
“Alzheimer's disease (r g = -0.27,P = 2.03 × 10 -5 )”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In brain single-cell expression gene set analyses, we found significant associations of striatal medium spiny neurons (P = 2.02 × 10^-14).
“we found significant associations of striatal medium spiny neurons (P = 2.02 × 10 -14 )”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The strongest association with gene expression was in the frontal cortex (P = 3.10 × 10^-9).
“particularly the frontal cortex (P = 3.10 × 10 -9 )”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Positional gene mapping aligned SNPs to 522 genes by genomic location.
“Positional gene mapping aligned SNPs to 522 genes by genomic location”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
435 of the mapped genes were implicated by at least two mapping strategies.
“435 of which were implicated by at least two mapping strategies”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
We observed enrichment for heritability of SNPs in conserved regions (P = 2.01 × 10^-12).
“We observed enrichment for heritability of SNPs in conserved regions (P = 2.01 × 10 -12 )”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
We observed strong associations with gene expression across multiple brain areas.
“we observed strong associations with gene expression across multiple brain areas”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Conditional analysis showed that the independent association signal in brain cells was driven by medium spiny neurons, neuroblasts, and pyramidal CA1 neurons.
“Conditional analysis showed that the independent association signal in brain cells was driven by medium spiny neurons, neuroblasts, and pyramidal CA1 neurons.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
146 (81 genome-wide significant) SNPs were exonic nonsynonymous (ExNS).
“yet 146 (81 genome-wide significant) SNPs were exonic nonsynonymous (ExNS)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
105 genes were implicated by all four strategies.
“In total, 105 genes were implicated by all four strategies”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
We observed positive genetic correlations with longevity (r_g = 0.43, P = 7.96 × 10^-8).
“positive correlations with longevity (r g = 0.43, P = 7.96 × 10 -8 )”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
We observed positive genetic correlations with autism (r_g = 0.25, P = 3.14 × 10^-7).
“autism (r g = 0.25, P = 3.14 × 10 -7 )”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
We observed enrichment for heritability of SNPs in coding regions (P = 1.67 × 10^-6).
“coding regions (P = 1.67 × 10 -6 )”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
We observed enrichment for heritability of SNPs among common (MAF > 0.3) variants.
“among common (minor allele frequency (MAF) > 0.3) variants”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
139 of the mapped genes were implicated by all three mapping strategies.
“139 of which were implicated by all three”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
g factors extracted from different sets of cognitive tests correlate very strongly (>0.98).
“g factors extracted from different sets of cognitive tests correlate very strongly (> 0.98 13,14 )”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [13] Johnson, W., Bouchard, T. J., Krueger, R. F., McGue, M. & Gottesman, I. I. Just one g: consistent results from three test batteries. Intelligence 32, 95–107 (2004). source
- cites [14] Johnson, W., Nijenhuis, Jt & Bouchard, T. J. Still just 1 g: consistent results from five test batteries. Intelligence 36, 81–95 (2008). source
- Premisecitation
Cognitive test scores display a positive manifold of correlations, a robust empirical phenomenon observed in multiple populations.
“cognitive test scores display a positive manifold of correlations, a robust empirical phenomenon that is observed in multiple populations 8”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [8] Jensen, A.R. The G Factor: The Science of Mental Ability (Praeger, Westport, CT, US, 1998).
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Intelligence is highly heritable.
“Intelligence is highly heritable 1”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1] Polderman, T. J. et al. Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies. Nat. Genet. 47, 702–709 (2015). source
- Study design and conductnone given
Different measures of intelligence assessed in each cohort were all operationalized to index a common latent g factor underlying multiple dimensions of cognitive functioning.
“Different measures of intelligence were assessed in each cohort but were all operationalized to index a common latent g factor underlying multiple dimensions of cognitive functioning.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: A common latent g factor underlies multiple dimensions of cognitive functioning and can be indexed by the different intelligence measures used across cohorts.
- Interpretationown data
Our results provide suggestive evidence of causal associations that may drive the correlations between intelligence and related traits.
“provide suggestive evidence of causal associations that may drive these correlations”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The GSMR analysis assumptions (e.g., genetic instruments are valid and not horizontally pleiotropic) hold for the causal inferences.
- Study design and conductnone given
Stringent quality control measures were applied to the summary statistics for each GWAS cohort before combining.
“Stringent quality control measures were applied to the summary statistics for each GWAS cohort before combining.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
The meta-analysis strategy includes replication by default, as it weights the reported test statistics by the evidence of association across multiple samples.
“The meta-analysis strategy includes replication by default, as it weights the reported test statistics by the evidence of association across multiple samples.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
Our results indicate overlap in the genetic processes involved in both cognitive functioning and neurological and psychiatric traits.
“Our results indicate overlap in the genetic processes involved in both cognitive functioning and neurological and psychiatric traits”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The low enrichment indicates largely distinct biological processes between intelligence and intellectual disability/developmental delay.
“indicating largely distinct biological processes”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
Higher intelligence was associated with higher risk of autism (OR = 1.38, b_xy = 0.321, P = 1.12 × 10^-3).
“but was associated with higher risk of autism (OR = 1.38, b xy = 0.321, P = 1.12 × 10 -3 )”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The GSMR analysis assumptions (e.g., genetic instruments are valid and not horizontally pleiotropic) hold for the causal inferences.
- Interpretationown data
We observed a strong bidirectional effect of educational attainment on intelligence (b_yx = 0.480, P = 6.85 × 10^-82).
“and of educational attainment on intelligence (b yx = 0.480, P = 6.85 × 10 -82 )”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The GSMR analysis assumptions (e.g., genetic instruments are valid and not horizontally pleiotropic) hold for the causal inferences.
- Interpretationown data
There was a relatively smaller reverse effect of schizophrenia on intelligence (b_yx = -0.214, P = 4.19 × 10^-52).
“and a relatively smaller reverse effect (b yx = -0.214,P = 4.19 × 10 -52 )”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The GSMR analysis assumptions (e.g., genetic instruments are valid and not horizontally pleiotropic) hold for the causal inferences.
- Interpretationown data
Higher intelligence had a protective effect on ADHD (OR = 0.48, b_xy = -0.734, P = 2.57 × 10^-46).
“Our results also suggested that higher intelligence had a protective effect on ADHD (OR = 0.48, b xy = -0.734,P = 2.57 × 10 -46 )”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The GSMR analysis assumptions (e.g., genetic instruments are valid and not horizontally pleiotropic) hold for the causal inferences.
- Interpretationown data
Higher intelligence had a protective effect on Alzheimer's disease (OR = 0.65, b_xy = -0.435, P = 3.59 × 10^-14).
“and Alzheimer's disease (OR = 0.65, b xy = -0.435,P = 3.59 × 10 -14 )”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The GSMR analysis assumptions (e.g., genetic instruments are valid and not horizontally pleiotropic) hold for the causal inferences.
- Interpretationown data
There was a bidirectional association showing a strong protective effect of intelligence on schizophrenia (OR = 0.50, b_xy = -0.685, P = 2.02 × 10^-57).
“There was also a bidirectional association showing a strong protective effect of intelligence on schizophrenia (odds ratio (OR) = 0.50, b xy = -0.685,P = 2.02 × 10 -57 )”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The GSMR analysis assumptions (e.g., genetic instruments are valid and not horizontally pleiotropic) hold for the causal inferences.
- Study design and conductown data
Power calculations using the Genetic Power Calculator indicated virtually 100% power to detect SNPs accounting for >0.05% of trait variance in N = 269,867.
“Power calculations using the Genetic Power Calculator indicated that we had virtually 100% power to detect SNPs accounting for >0.05% of trait variance in our sample size of N=269867.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
There was additional evidence for pleiotropy between intelligence and schizophrenia.
“with additional evidence for pleiotropy”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The GSMR analysis assumptions (e.g., genetic instruments are valid and not horizontally pleiotropic) hold for the causal inferences.
- Interpretationown data
We observed a strong bidirectional effect of cognitive ability on educational attainment (b_xy = 0.549, P < 1 × 10^-320).
“We observed a strong bidirectional effect of cognitive ability on educational attainment (b xy = 0.549, P < 1 × 10 -320 )”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The GSMR analysis assumptions (e.g., genetic instruments are valid and not horizontally pleiotropic) hold for the causal inferences.
- Study design and conductown data
Aggregate genomic associations were replicated using polygenic score validation in four holdout samples.
“Aggregate genomic associations were replicated using polygenic score validation in four holdout samples.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 40
- May combine two claims. 20
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIntelligence has been associated with a wide variety of human behaviors and brain anatomy.
“Intelligence has been associated with a wide variety of human behaviors 15 and brain anatomy 27”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationRecent genome-wide meta-analyses have identified 24 genomic loci linked to variation in intelligence.
“Recent genome-wide metaanalyses have identified 24 genomic loci linked to variation in intelligence 3-7”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim5 of 5 sources checked- cites [3] Davies, G. et al. Genetic contributions to variation in general cognitive function: a meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies in the CHARGE consortium (N = 53949). Mol. Psychiatry 20, 183–192 (2015). source
The Results report 13 genome-wide significant SNPs in three genomic regions associated with general cognitive function. This supports the claim that a genome-wide meta-analysis identified linked regions, but this paper does not establish the cited sentence’s total of 24 loci across multiple analyses. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [4] Davies, G. et al. Genome-wide association study of cognitive functions and educational attainment in UK Biobank (N = 112 151). Mol. Psychiatry 21, 758–767 (2016). source
The Introduction (page unavailable) reports genome-wide significant associations with general cognitive function, and the Results section on verbal–numerical reasoning (page unavailable) identifies three associated genomic regions. These passages support the link between genomic loci and cognitive variation, but the paper does not establish the claimed total of 24 loci identified by recent meta-analyses. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [5] Sniekers, S. et al. Genome-wide association meta-analysis of 78,308 individuals identifies new loci and genes influencing human intelligence. Nat. Genet. 49, 1107–1112 (2017). source
The Letters section reports that this genome-wide meta-analysis identified loci associated with intelligence, supporting the general point. It reports 18 independent significant loci, not 24; the cited paper alone therefore does not substantiate the sentence’s total across multiple studies. No page number is supplied in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [6] Trampush, J. W. et al. GWAS meta-analysis reveals novel loci and genetic correlates for general cognitive function: a report from the COGENT consortium. Mol. Psychiatry 22, 336–345 (2017). source
The Results (GWAS of general cognitive function; page unavailable) report two genome-wide-significant loci, supporting the claim that a meta-analysis identified loci associated with cognitive performance. The Abstract reports that 24 is the number of cohorts studied, not the number of loci identified; it also reports three additional loci from gene-based analysis. This source therefore does not support the count of 24 genomic loci. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [7] Zabaneh, D. et al. A genome-wide association study for extremely high intelligence. Mol. Psychiatry 23, 1226–1232 (2018). source
The Results (Analysis of genome-wide SNPs; page unavailable) identify three significant SNPs at one ADAM12 locus, and the Introduction discusses earlier genome-wide studies of intelligence. Neither passage supports the specific claim that meta-analyses identified 24 loci. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIntelligence is a major determinant of human health and well-being.
“a major determinant of human health and well-being 2”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [2] Wraw, C., Deary, I. J., Gale, C. R. & Der, G. Intelligence in youth and health at age 50. Intelligence 53, 23–32 (2015). source
The Abstract’s Results & conclusion and the Discussion (page numbers not provided) link higher intelligence in youth with better physical health and fewer chronic conditions at age 50. They describe associations, not intelligence as a major determinant of human health generally, and the study does not establish an effect on well-being. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPrevious studies implicate bidirectional causal effects between cognitive ability and educational attainment.
“Such findings are consistent with previous studies implicating bidirectional causal effects 30,31”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationConserved and regulatory regions have previously been implicated in cognitive functioning, but coding regions have not.
“Conserved and regulatory regions have previously been implicated in cognitive functioning 22 , but coding regions have not.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [22] Hill, W. D. et al. Molecular genetic aetiology of general cognitive function is enriched in evolutionarily conserved regions. Transl. Psychiatry 6, e980 (2016). source
The Results (Partitioned heritability; page unavailable) report enrichment for cognitive-function heritability in conserved regions and in regulatory annotations, including weak enhancers and DNase hypersensitivity sites. The paper does not establish the broader claim that coding regions have not been implicated in cognitive functioning. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPrevious reports support both a causal link and genetic overlap between intelligence and schizophrenia.
“A number of previous reports support both a causal link and genetic overlap between these phenotypes 32,33”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [32] Kendler, K. S., Ohlsson, H., Sundquist, J. & Sundquist, K. IQ and schizophrenia in a Swedish national sample: their causal relationship and the interaction of IQ with genetic risk. Am. J. Psychiatry 172, 259–265 (2015). source
- cites [33] Le Hellard, S. et al. Identification of gene loci that overlap between schizophrenia and educational attainment. Schizophr. Bull. 43, 654–664 (2017). source
The Discussion and the ‘Genetic Overlap of SCZ and Educational Attainment’ section report genetic overlap between general cognition and schizophrenia; page numbers are unavailable in our copy. The paper does not establish a causal link between intelligence and schizophrenia, so it supports only the genetic-overlap part of the claim. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationA false discovery rate of 1 × 10-5 was used to define significant chromatin interactions, based on previous recommendations modified for the cell lines used.
“We used an FDR of 1 × 10 -5 to define significant interactions, based on previous recommendations 51 modified to account for the differences in cell lines used here.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [51] Schmitt, A. D. et al. A compendium of chromatin contact maps reveals spatially active regions in the human genome. Cell Rep. 17, 2042–2059 (2016). source
The Experimental Procedures ('Identification of significant Hi-C contacts') support using an FDR threshold to define significant contacts, but specify FDR < 1 × 10⁻⁶, not 1 × 10⁻⁵. The Results ('Identification of Frequently Interacting Regions') discuss variation between samples, but do not describe the citing authors’ cell-line-specific modification. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationBrain-cell-type expression data used to construct the cell-type gene sets were drawn from single-cell RNA-seq data from mouse brains.
“Briefly, brain-cell-type expression data were drawn from single-cell RNA-seq data from mouse brains.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [53] Skene, N. G. et al. Genetic identification of brain cell types underlying schizophrenia. Nat. Genet. 50, 825–833 (2018). source
- cites [37] Coleman, J.R.I. et al. Biological annotation of genetic loci associated with intelligence in a meta-analysis of 87,740 individuals. Mol. Psychiatry https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-018-0040-6 (2018). source
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationComparison with previous GWAS supported these correlations, showing numerous shared genetic variants across phenotypes.
“Comparison with previous GWAS 28 supported these correlations, showing numerous shared genetic variants across phenotypes”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [28] MacArthur, J. et al. The new NHGRI-EBI Catalog of published genome-wide association studies (GWAS Catalog). Nucleic Acids Res. 45(D1), D896–D901 (2017). source
The Introduction (page not provided) says GWAS Catalog data have been used to find evidence of pleiotropy, which supports the general idea of genetic associations across traits. It does not report the citing authors’ comparison with previous GWAS, confirm their correlations, or show that numerous variants were shared across the phenotypes they studied. (LLM, conf=0.80)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationA CADD score above 12.37 is the threshold for a variant to be potentially pathogenic.
“A CADD score above 12.37 is the threshold to be potentially pathogenic 23 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [23] Kircher, M. et al. A general framework for estimating the relative pathogenicity of human genetic variants. Nat. Genet. 46, 310–315 (2014). source
The Technical Report says CADD scores rank known pathogenic variants highly, but it does not establish 12.37 as a pathogenicity threshold. It also says C-scores cannot be precisely calibrated to the likelihood that a variant is pathogenic and are best interpreted as indicating likelihood of deleteriousness. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe estimated GSMR causal effect coefficients (bxy) are approximately equal to the natural log odds ratio for a case-control trait.
“The estimated causal effect coefficients (b xy ) are approximately equal to the natural log odds ratio (OR) for a case-control trait 29 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [29] Zhu, Z. et al. Causal associations between risk factors and common diseases inferred from GWAS summary data. Nat. Commun. 9, 224 (2018). source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe NCP-weighting method improves power when using an extreme case sampling design such as HiQ and provides a comparable metric to combine information from different analytic designs while accounting for differences in power/effective sample size.
“This method improves power when using an extreme case sampling design such as that in HiQ 35 and provides a comparable metric with which to combine information from different analytic designs while accounting for their differences in power/effective sample size.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [35] Peloso, G. M. et al. Phenotypic extremes in rare variant study designs. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 24, 924–930 (2016). source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductcitationIndependently associated loci from the meta-analysis were defined using FUMA.
“Independently associated loci from the metaanalysis were defined using FUMA 24 (see URLs), an online platform for functional mapping of genetic variants.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [24] Watanabe, K., Taskesen, E., van Bochoven, A. & Posthuma, D. Functional mapping and annotation of genetic associations with FUMA. Nat. Commun. 8, 1826 (2017). source
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataConvergent evidence of strong association (z = 9.49) and the highest observed probability of a deleterious protein effect (CADD score = 34) were found for rs13107325.
“Convergent evidence of strong association (z = 9.49) and the highest observed probability of a deleterious protein effect (CADD 23 score = 34) were found for rs13107325.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [23] Kircher, M. et al. A general framework for estimating the relative pathogenicity of human genetic variants. Nat. Genet. 46, 310–315 (2014). source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationGSMR can help differentiate the likely causal direction of association between two traits but cannot make any statement about the intermediate mechanisms involved in any potential causal process.
“This method can help differentiate the likely causal direction of association between two traits but cannot make any statement about the intermediate mechanisms involved in any potential causal process.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [29] Zhu, Z. et al. Causal associations between risk factors and common diseases inferred from GWAS summary data. Nat. Commun. 9, 224 (2018). source
The Methods section describes GSMR as testing whether an exposure causally affects an outcome, and the Results section uses forward and reverse GSMR analyses to assess direction. The Results also say it is difficult to distinguish whether an effect is mediated by other risk factors or driven by them. But the paper does examine associations among risk factors and conditional effects, so the categorical claim that GSMR cannot make any statement about intermediate mechanisms overstates its stated limitation. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- The authors state this as an assumption: The effect of non-pleiotropic SNPs on an exposure is related to their effect on the outcome in an independent sample only via mediation through the phenotypic causal pathway.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationFUMA contains Hi-C data for 14 tissue types from the study of Schmitt et al.
“FUMA currently contains Hi-C data for 14 tissue types from the study of Schmitt et al. 51 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [51] Schmitt, A. D. et al. A compendium of chromatin contact maps reveals spatially active regions in the human genome. Cell Rep. 17, 2042–2059 (2016). source
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataAge-stratified meta-analyses indicated comparable heritability across age groups, hSNP2 = 0.19-0.22.
“comparable heritability across age groups, as captured by the SNPs included in the analysis (h SNP 2 = 0.19-0.22)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataConditional analysis indicated three independent associations-regulation of nervous system development, central nervous system neuron differentiation, and regulation of synapse structure or activity-that together accounted for the associations of the other sets.
“Conditional analysis indicated that there were three independent associations-regulation of nervous system development, central nervous system neuron differentiation, and regulation of synapse structure or activity-that together accounted for the associations of the other sets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown data350 of the GWGAS genes were also mapped by FUMA.
“of which 350 were also mapped by FUMA”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe FUMA-mapped genes were enriched for brain tissue expression and several regulatory biological gene sets.
“The FUMA-mapped genes were enriched for brain tissue expression and several regulatory biological gene sets”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCross-locus interactions implicated ELAVL2, PTCH1, ATF4, FBXL17, and MAN2A1 in the left ventricle of the heart, SATB2 in liver tissue, and MEF2C in five tissues.
“Cross-locus interactions implicated ELAVL2, PTCH1, ATF4, FBXL17, and MAN2A1 in the left ventricle of the heart, SATB2 in liver tissue, and MEF2C in five tissues.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown datars13107325 is a missense mutation (MAF = 0.065, P = 2.23 × 10^-21) in SLC39A8 and was the lead SNP in locus 71.
“This missense mutation (MAF = 0.065, P = 2.23 × 10 -21 ) in SLC39A8 was the lead SNP in locus 71”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationTwin and family studies show strong genetic correlations across diverse cognitive domains, suggesting pleiotropy, and across levels of ability.
“twin and family studies show strong genetic correlations across diverse cognitive domains 11 , suggesting pleiotropy, and across levels of ability 11”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [11] Plomin, R. & Kovas, Y. Generalist genes and learning disabilities. Psychol. Bull. 131, 592–617 (2005). source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationThe variance common across cognitive tasks can be modeled as a latent factor denoted as g (the general factor of intelligence).
“the variance common across cognitive tasks can be modeled as a latent factor denoted as g (the general factor of intelligence) 9,10”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningThe Bonferroni-corrected significance threshold for the 56 functional annotation categories in the stratified LD Score regression was 0.05/56 = 0.0009.
“The Bonferroni-corrected significance threshold was 0.05/56 annotations = 0.0009.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataRestricting interaction-mapped genes to those with an enhancer-promoter overlap reduced the number of genes mapped but increased the likelihood that the identified genes would have a plausible biological function.
“This reduced the number of genes mapped but increased the likelihood that those identified would have a plausible biological function.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenSNP-based replication was carried out using a proxy phenotype of educational attainment in an independent sample.
“SNP-based replication was carried out using a proxy phenotype of educational attainment in an independent sample.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenA P value threshold of 0.01 was used for HEIDI outlier detection in the GSMR analyses, which removes 1% of SNPs by chance if there is no pleiotropic effect.
“We used a threshold P value of 0.01 for the outlier detection analysis in HEIDI, which removes 1% of SNPs by chance if there is no pleiotropic effect.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataWith the exception of HiQ/HRS, all cohorts used a normally distributed single sum, mean, or factor score from a multidimensional set of cognitive performance tests as the phenotype in a covariate-adjusted GWAS using linear regression.
“With the exception of HiQ/HRS, all cohorts extracted a single sum score, mean score, or factor score from a multidimensional set of cognitive performance tests and used this normally distributed score as the phenotype in a covariate-adjusted (for example, age, sex, ancestry principal components) GWAS using linear regression methods.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningThe Bonferroni-corrected significance threshold for the 38 genetic correlation tests was 0.05/38 = 1.32 × 10-3.
“The Bonferroni-corrected significance threshold was 0.05/38 traits = 1.32 × 10 -3 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenMany of the 1,518 genes linked to intellectual disability and/or developmental delay were identified by non-GWAS sources and are not represented in the NHGRI catalog.
“Many of these have been identified by non-GWAS sources and are not represented in the NHGRI catalog.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataPolygenic scores were calculated from leave-one-out meta-analyses in which four cohorts were separately excluded and reserved for score validation.
“We calculated polygenic scores (PGSs) based on the SNP effect sizes of the leave-one-out meta-analyses, from which four cohorts were (separately) excluded and reserved for score validation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe X chromosome was treated separately because imputed genotypes were not available for the X chromosome in UKB and there was little overlap between UKB called genotypes and imputed data from other cohorts (n SNPs < 500).
“The X chromosome was treated separately in the meta-analysis because imputed genotypes were not available for the X chromosome in the largest cohort (UKB), and there was little overlap between the UKB called genotypes and imputed data from other cohorts (n SNPs < 500).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningOnly called X-chromosome variants in UKB were included for X-chromosome analyses after X-chromosome-specific quality-control steps.
“We therefore included only the called X-chromosome variants in UKB for these analyses after performing X-chromosome-specific quality-control steps 38 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [38] König, I. R., Loley, C., Erdmann, J. & Ziegler, A. How to include chromosome X in your genome-wide association study. Genet. Epidemiol. 38, 97–103 (2014). source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningThe Bonferroni-corrected significance threshold for the 9,494 gene sets tested by GENE2FUNC was 0.05/9,494 = 5.27 × 10-6.
“The Bonferroni-corrected significance threshold was 0.05/9,494 gene sets = 5.27 × 10 -6 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenA false discovery rate of 0.05 was used to define significant eQTL associations in the gene mapping.
“We used a false discovery rate (FDR) of 0.05 to define significant eQTL associations”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataThe explained variance (ΔR2) of each polygenic score was derived from a linear model regressing the GWAS intelligence phenotype on the PGS while controlling for the same covariates as in each cohort-specific GWAS, compared to a covariates-only model.
“The explained variance (Δ R 2 ) was derived from a linear model in which the GWAS intelligence phenotype was regressed on each PGS while controlling for the same covariates as in each cohort-specific GWAS, compared to a linear model with GWAS covariates only.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenAll files were checked for data integrity and accuracy.
“All files were checked for data integrity and accuracy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningThe Bonferroni-corrected significance threshold for the 7,323 gene sets tested with MAGMA was 0.05/7,323 = 6.83 × 10-6.
“The Bonferroni-corrected significance threshold was 0.05/7,323 gene sets = 6.83 × 10 -6 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenAfter combining all data, meta-analysis results were filtered to exclude any variants with n < 50,000.
“After combining all data, meta-analysis results were further filtered to exclude any variants with n < 50,000.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenIndependent significant SNPs were defined as having a Bonferroni-corrected genome-wide significant two-tailed P < 5 × 10−8 and representing signals independent from each other at r2 < 0.6.
“We first identified 'independent significant SNPs' , which had a Bonferroni-corrected genome-wide significant two-tailed P value (P < 5 × 10 -8 ) and represented signals that were independent from each other at r 2 < 0.6.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenIndels and SNPs that were duplicated, multiallelic, monomorphic, or ambiguous (A/T or C/G with MAF > 0.4) were excluded.
“Indels and SNPs that were duplicated, multiallelic, monomorphic, or ambiguous (A/T or C/G with MAF > 0.4) were also excluded.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningThe Bonferroni-corrected genome-wide significance threshold for the 18,128 genes tested in the GWGAS was 0.05/18,128 = 2.76 × 10-6.
“The Bonferroni-corrected genome-wide significance threshold was 0.05/18,128 genes = 2.76 × 10 -6 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataTo create independent discovery samples for polygenic score validation, meta-analyses were conducted with a leave-one-out strategy excluding each of four validation datasets.
“To create independent discovery samples for use in polygenic score validation, we also conducted meta-analyses with a 'leave-one-out' strategy in which summary statistics from four validation datasets were each excluded from the meta-analysis”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationSNPs were filtered from further analysis if they had imputation quality (INFO/R2) < 0.6, Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium P < 5 × 10−6, study-specific minor allele count < 100, or mismatch of alleles or allele frequency difference greater than 20% from the HRC reference panel.
“SNPs were filtered from further analysis if they met any of the following criteria: imputation quality (INFO/R 2 ) score < 0.6, Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium P < 5 × 10 -6 , study-specific minor allele frequency (MAF) corresponding to a minor allele count (MAC) < 100, and mismatch of alleles or allele frequency difference greater than 20% from the Haplotype Reference Consortium (HRC) genome reference”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [16] Deary, I. J. Intelligence. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 63, 453–482 (2012). source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataVisual inspection of the distribution of summary statistics was performed, and Manhattan plots and quantile-quantile plots were created for the cleaned summary statistics from each cohort.
“Visual inspection of the distribution of the summary statistics was performed, and Manhattan plots and quantile-quantile plots were created for the cleaned summary statistics from each cohort (Supplementary Fig. 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisereasoningBecause chromatin interactions are often defined at a resolution such as 40 kb, an interacting region can span multiple genes.
“Because chromatin interactions are often defined in a certain resolution, such as 40 kb, an interacting region can span multiple genes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenOlder samples were screened for cognitive decline to exclude the possibility of dementia affecting performance on cognitive tests.
“Participants ranged from children to older adults, with older samples being screened for cognitive decline to exclude the possibility of dementia affecting performance on cognitive tests.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataA random-effects meta-analysis was included for each phase to evaluate potential heterogeneity in SNP association statistics between cohorts.
“We additionally included a random-effects meta-analysis for each phase, as implemented in METAL, to evaluate potential heterogeneity in the SNP association statistics between cohorts.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataFor each independent genomic locus, evidence for replication was defined as the lead SNP or another correlated SNP in the region being sign concordant with the corresponding intelligence meta-analysis SNP and having a two-tailed P value of association with educational attainment < 0.05/242 = 0.0002.
“For each independent genomic locus, we considered it to be evidence for replication if the lead SNP or another correlated SNP in the region was sign concordant with the corresponding SNP in the intelligence meta-analysis and had a two-tailed P value of association with educational attainment smaller than 0.05/242 independent tests = 0.0002.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataTo test replication of SNPs with educational attainment, a sign concordance test was performed for all genome-wide significant SNPs from the meta-analysis using the two-tailed exact binomial test.
“To test replication of the SNPs with this proxy phenotype, we performed a sign concordance test for all genome-wide significant SNPs from the meta-analysis using the two-tailed exact binomial test.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
The GSMR analysis assumptions (e.g., genetic instruments are valid and not horizontally pleiotropic) hold for the causal inferences.
“We used Generalized Summary-data-based Mendelian randomization 29 to test for potential credible causal associations between intelligence and genetically correlated traits”
The paper relies on this without support.
A common latent g factor underlies multiple dimensions of cognitive functioning and can be indexed by the different intelligence measures used across cohorts.
“Different measures of intelligence were assessed in each cohort but were all operationalized to index a common latent g factor underlying multiple dimensions of cognitive functioning.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The effect of non-pleiotropic SNPs on an exposure is related to their effect on the outcome in an independent sample only via mediation through the phenotypic causal pathway.
“given the assumption that the effect of non-pleiotropic SNPs on an exposure (x) should be related to their effect on the outcome (y) in an independent sample only via mediation through the phenotypic causal pathway (b xy )”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Genome-wide association studies to date suggest that hundreds to thousands of genes additively influence variation in intelligence, with the effect of any one gene being very small.
“Most genome-wide association studies (GWAS) to date have focused on intelligence or g [234–237], and suggest that hundreds to thousands of genes additively influence variation in intelligence, with the effect of any one gene being very small (typically in GWAS, a variant has r2 < 0.05% [238]).”
From The role of prefrontal cortex in cognitive control and executive function (2022) · cites this paper as [234]
The paper reports 1,016 genes associated with intelligence (Abstract; page not provided), supporting the claim that many genes are involved. It also describes individually small effects for nonsynonymous SNPs (Abstract; page not provided), but does not establish that every implicated gene has a very small effect or that the genes act additively. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredZNF638 is highly expressed in the brain, particularly in oligodendrocytes and their precursor cells, and has been implicated in large-scale genetic studies of intelligence and general cognitive ability.
“The gene is highly expressed in the brain, particularly in oligodendrocytes and their precursor cells, and has been implicated in large-scale genetic studies of intelligence and general cognitive ability43.”
From Locus for severity implicates CNS resilience in progression of multiple sclerosis (2023) · cites this paper as [43]
The Letters report brain-expression and intelligence associations for groups of genes, but the passages found do not identify ZNF638 among them. A figure label lists oligodendrocytes and their precursors without linking either cell type to ZNF638. Searches for ZNF638 and its claimed cell-specific expression found no passage addressing the gene-specific claim. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredGenetic variants in dysbindin-1 are strongly associated with human intelligence.
“Genetic variants in dysbindin-1 are strongly associated with human intelligence [51].”
From Oxytocin Signaling in the Central Amygdala Modulates Emotion Discrimination in Mice (2019) · cites this paper as [51]
Cites
Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology
Ashburner, M., Ball, C. A., Blake, J. A., Botstein, D., Butler, H., Cherry, J. M., Davis, A. P., Dolinski, K., Dwight, S. S., Eppig, J. T., et al. (2000) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/75556 · Cited by 43,206 · see citing works
ANNOVAR: functional annotation of genetic variants from high-throughput sequencing data
Wang, K., Li, M., & Hakonarson, H. H. (2010) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkq603 · Cited by 14,380 · see citing works
Second-generation PLINK: rising to the challenge of larger and richer datasets
Chang, C. C., Chow, C. C., Tellier, L. C., Vattikuti, S., Purcell, S. M., & Lee, J. J. (2015) · Gigascience · doi:10.1186/s13742-015-0047-8 · Cited by 12,709 · see citing works
Molecular signatures database (MSigDB) 3.0
Liberzon, A., Subramanian, A., Pinchback, R., Thorvaldsdóttir, H., Tamayo, P., & Mesirov, J. P. (2011) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btr260 · Cited by 7,111 · see citing works
Integrative analysis of 111 reference human epigenomes
Roadmap Epigenomics Consortium, Kundaje, A., Meuleman, W., Ernst, J., Bilenky, M., Yen, A., Heravi-Moussavi, A., Kheradpour, P., Zhang, Z., Wang, J., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14248 · Cited by 6,368 · see citing works
"General Intelligence," Objectively Determined and Measured
Spearman, C. (1904) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1412107 · Cited by 6,207 · see citing works
A general framework for estimating the relative pathogenicity of human genetic variants
Kircher, M., Witten, D. M., Jain, P., O'Roak, B. J., Cooper, G. M., & Shendure, J. (2014) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.2892 · Cited by 6,183 · see citing works
LD Score regression distinguishes confounding from polygenicity in genome-wide association studies
Schizophrenia Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium, Bulik-Sullivan, B. K., Loh, P.-R., Finucane, H. K., Ripke, S., Yang, J., Patterson, N., Daly, M. J., Price, A. L., & Neale, B. M. (2015) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3211 · Cited by 5,559 · see citing works
METAL: fast and efficient meta-analysis of genomewide association scans
Willer, C. J., Li, Y., & Abecasis, G. R. (2010) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq340 · Cited by 5,205 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) pilot analysis: Multitissue gene regulation in humans
The GTEx Consortium, Ardlie, K. G., Deluca, D. S., Segrè, A. V., Sullivan, T. J., Young, T. R., Gelfand, E. T., Trowbridge, C. A., Maller, J. B., Tukiainen, T., et al. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1262110 · Cited by 5,062 · see citing works
An atlas of genetic correlations across human diseases and traits
ReproGen Consortium, Bulik-Sullivan, B., Psychiatric Genomics Consortium, Genetic Consortium for Anorexia Nervosa of the Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium 3, Finucane, H. K., Anttila, V., Gusev, A., Day, F. R., Loh, P.-R., Duncan, L., et al. (2015) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3406 · Cited by 4,255 · see citing works
Human Cognitive Abilities: A Survey of Factor-Analytic Studies
Carroll, J. B. (1993) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511571312 · Cited by 4,121 · see citing works
Functional mapping and annotation of genetic associations with FUMA
Watanabe, K., Taskesen, E., van Bochoven, A., & Posthuma, D. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-017-01261-5 · Cited by 4,083 · see citing works
Self-citationMAGMA: Generalized Gene-Set Analysis of GWAS Data
de Leeuw, C. A., Mooij, J. M., Heskes, T., & Posthuma, D. (2015) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004219 · Cited by 3,653 · see citing works
Human cognitive abilities a survey of factor-analytic studies
Carroll, J. B. (2004) · Cited by 3,396 · see citing works
Integration of summary data from GWAS and eQTL studies predicts complex trait gene targets
Zhu, Z., Zhang, F., Hu, H., Bakshi, A., Robinson, M. R., Powell, J. E., Montgomery, G. W., Goddard, M. E., Wray, N. R., Visscher, P. M., et al. (2016) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3538 · Cited by 3,352 · see citing works
Self-citationAnnotation of functional variation in personal genomes using RegulomeDB
Boyle, A. P., Hong, E. L., Hariharan, M., Cheng, Y., Schaub, M. A., Kasowski, M., Karczewski, K. J., Park, J., Hitz, B. C., Weng, S., et al. (2012) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.137323.112 · Cited by 2,722 · see citing works
Partitioning heritability by functional annotation using genome-wide association summary statistics
ReproGen Consortium, Finucane, H. K., Schizophrenia Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium, The RACI Consortium, Bulik-Sullivan, B., Gusev, A., Trynka, G., Reshef, Y., Loh, P.-R., Anttila, V., et al. (2015) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3404 · Cited by 2,604 · see citing works
Self-citationChromHMM: automating chromatin-state discovery and characterization
Ernst, J., & Kellis, M. (2012) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.1906 · Cited by 2,489 · see citing works
Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies
Polderman, T. J. C., Benyamin, B., de Leeuw, C. A., Sullivan, P. F., van Bochoven, A., Visscher, P. M., & Posthuma, D. (2015) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3285 · Cited by 2,467 · see citing works
The new NHGRI-EBI Catalog of published genome-wide association studies (GWAS Catalog)
MacArthur, J., Bowler, E., Cerezo, M., Gil, L., Hall, P., Hastings, E., Junkins, H., McMahon, A., Milano, A., Morales, J., et al. (2017) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkw1133 · Cited by 2,161 · see citing works
Purcell, S., Cherny, S. S., & Sham, P. C. (2003) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/19.1.149 · Cited by 2,057 · see citing works
Intelligence and educational achievement
Deary, I. J., Strand, S., Smith, P., & Fernandes, C. (2007) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2006.02.001 · Cited by 1,723 · see citing works
Self-citationSystematic identification of trans eQTLs as putative drivers of known disease associations
Westra, H.-J., Peters, M. J., Esko, T., Yaghootkar, H., Schurmann, C., Kettunen, J., Christiansen, M. W., Fairfax, B. P., Schramm, K., Powell, J. E., et al. (2013) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.2756 · Cited by 1,658 · see citing works
Self-citationModeling Linkage Disequilibrium Increases Accuracy of Polygenic Risk Scores
Vilhjálmsson, B. J., Yang, J., Finucane, H. K., Gusev, A., Lindström, S., Ripke, S., Genovese, G., Loh, P.-R., Bhatia, G., Do, R., et al. (2015) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2015.09.001 · Cited by 1,303 · see citing works
Self-citationGenome-wide association study identifies 74 loci associated with educational attainment
Okbay, A., Beauchamp, J. P., Fontana, M. A., Lee, J. J., Pers, T. H., Rietveld, C. A., Turley, P., Chen, G.-B., Emilsson, V., Meddens, S. F. W., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature17671 · Cited by 1,297 · see citing works
Self-citationPRSice: Polygenic Risk Score software
Euesden, J., Lewis, C. M., & O’Reilly, P. F. (2014) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu848 · Cited by 1,149 · see citing works
The neuroscience of human intelligence differences
Deary, I. J., Penke, L., & Johnson, W. (2010) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2793 · Cited by 1,038 · see citing works
Self-citationCausal associations between risk factors and common diseases inferred from GWAS summary data
Zhu, Z., Zheng, Z., Zhang, F., Wu, Y., Trzaskowski, M., Maier, R., Robinson, M. R., McGrath, J. J., Visscher, P. M., Wray, N. R., et al. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-017-02317-2 · Cited by 951 · see citing works
A compendium of chromatin contact maps reveals spatially active regions in the human genome
Schmitt, A. D., Hu, M., Jung, I., Xu, Z., Qiu, Y., Tan, C. L., Li, Y., Lin, S., Lin, Y., Barr, C. L., et al. (2016) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2016.10.061 · Cited by 866 · see citing works
GWAS of 126,559 Individuals Identifies Genetic Variants Associated with Educational Attainment
Rietveld, C. A., Medland, S. E., Derringer, J., Yang, J., Esko, T., Martin, N. W., Westra, H.-J., Shakhbazov, K., Abdellaoui, A., Agrawal, A., et al. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1235488 · Cited by 827 · see citing works
Self-citationGenetic identification of brain cell types underlying schizophrenia
Major Depressive Disorder Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium, Skene, N. G., Bryois, J., Bakken, T. E., Breen, G., Crowley, J. J., Gaspar, H. A., Giusti-Rodriguez, P., Hodge, R. D., Miller, J. A., et al. (2018) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-018-0129-5 · Cited by 651 · see citing works
Self-citationGeneralist Genes and Learning Disabilities.
Plomin, R., & Kovas, Y. (2005) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.4.592 · Cited by 534 · see citing works
Self-citationThe new genetics of intelligence
Plomin, R. J., & von Stumm, S. (2018) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg.2017.104 · Cited by 495 · see citing works
Self-citationSniekers, S., Stringer, S., Watanabe, K., Jansen, P. R., Coleman, J. R. I., Krapohl, E., Taskesen, E., Hammerschlag, A. R., Okbay, A., Zabaneh, D., et al. (2017) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3869 · Cited by 490 · see citing works
Self-citationDeary, I. J. (2012) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100353 · Cited by 467 · see citing works
Self-citationIdentification of context-dependent expression quantitative trait loci in whole blood
Zhernakova, D. V., Deelen, P., Vermaat, M., van Iterson, M., van Galen, M., Arindrarto, W., van 't Hof, P., Mei, H., van Dijk, F., Westra, H.-J., et al. (2017) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3737 · Cited by 441 · see citing works
Davies, G., Armstrong, N., Bis, J. C., Bressler, J., Chouraki, V, Giddaluru, S., Hofer, E., Ibrahim-Verbaas, C. A., Kirin, M., Lahti, J., et al. (2015) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/mp.2014.188 · Cited by 384 · see citing works
Self-citationDavies, G., Marioni, R. E., Liewald, D. C., Hill, W. D., Hagenaars, S. P., Harris, S. E., Ritchie, S. J., Luciano, M., Fawns-Ritchie, C., Lyall, D., et al. (2016) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/mp.2016.45 · Cited by 373 · see citing works
Self-citationThe association between brain volume and intelligence is of genetic origin
Posthuma, D., De Geus, E. J. C., Baaré, W. F. C., Pol, H. E. H., Kahn, R. S., & Boomsma, D. I. (2002) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn0202-83 · Cited by 356 · see citing works
Just one g: consistent results from three test batteries
Johnson, W., Bouchard, T. J., Krueger, R. F., McGue, M., & Gottesman, I. I. (2004) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/s0160-2896(03)00062-x · Cited by 353 · see citing works
Sniekers, S., Stringer, S., Watanabe, K., Jansen, P. R., Coleman, J. R. I., Krapohl, E. M. L., Taskesen, E., Hammerschlag, A. R., Okbay, A., Zabaneh, D., et al. (2017) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1017-1558c · Cited by 333 · see citing works
Self-citationStill just 1 g: Consistent results from five test batteries
Johnson, W., Nijenhuis, J. T., & Bouchard, T. J. (2008) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2007.06.001 · Cited by 304 · see citing works
The statistical properties of gene-set analysis
de Leeuw, C., Neale, B. M., Heskes, T., & Posthuma, D. (2016) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg.2016.29 · Cited by 286 · see citing works
Trampush, J. W., Yang, M. L. Z., Yu, J., Knowles, E., Davies, G., Liewald, D. C., Starr, J. M., Djurovic, S., Melle, I., Sundet, K., et al. (2017) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/mp.2016.244 · Cited by 271 · see citing works
Self-citationCausal associations between risk factors and common diseases inferred from GWAS summary dataPreprint
Zhu, Z., Zheng, Z., Zhang, F., et al. (2017) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/168674 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
An Atlas of Genetic Correlations across Human Diseases and TraitsPreprint
Bulik-Sullivan, B. K., Finucane, H. K., Anttila, V., et al. (2015) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/014498 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Intelligence in youth and health at age 50
Wraw, C., Deary, I. J., Gale, C. R., & Der, G. (2015) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2015.08.001 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Self-citationHow to Include Chromosome X in Your Genome‐Wide Association Study
König, I. R., Loley, C., Erdmann, J., & Ziegler, A. (2014) · Genetic Epidemiology · doi:10.1002/gepi.21782 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Kendler, K. S., Ohlsson, H., Sundquist, J., & Sundquist, K. (2015) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2014.14040516 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Self-citationLD Score Regression Distinguishes Confounding from Polygenicity in Genome-Wide Association StudiesPreprint
Bulik-Sullivan, B. K., Loh, P., Finucane, H. K., et al. (2014) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/002931 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Genetic identification Of brain cell types underlying schizophreniaPreprint
Skene, N., Bryois, J., Bakken, T. E., et al. (2017) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/145466 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Self-citationIdentification of Gene Loci That Overlap Between Schizophrenia and Educational Attainment
Le Hellard, S., Wang, Y., Witoelar, A., Zuber, V., Bettella, F., Hugdahl, K., Espeseth, T., Steen, V. M., Melle, I., Desikan, R., et al. (2016) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbw085 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Self-citationA genome-wide association study for extremely high intelligence
Zabaneh, D., Krapohl, E., Gaspar, H. A., Curtis, C., Lee, S. H., Patel, H., Newhouse, S., Wu, H. M., Simpson, M. A., Putallaz, M., et al. (2018) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/mp.2017.121 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Self-citationGenetic and environmental transactions underlying educational attainment
Johnson, W., Deary, I. J., & Iacono, W. G. (2009) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2009.05.006 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Self-citationColeman, J. R. I., Bryois, J., Gaspar, H. A., Jansen, P. R., Savage, J. E., Skene, N., Plomin, R., Muñoz-Manchado, A. B., Linnarsson, S., Crawford, G., et al. (2019) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-018-0040-6 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Self-citationIntelligence in youth and mental health at age 50
Wraw, C., Deary, I. J., Der, G., & Galé, C. R. (2016) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2016.06.005 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Self-citationPhenotypic extremes in rare variant study designs
Peloso, G. M., Rader, D. J., Gabriel, S., Kathiresan, S., Daly, M. J., & Neale, B. M. (2016) · European Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1038/ejhg.2015.197 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
FUMA: Functional mapping and annotation of genetic associationsPreprint
Watanabe, K., Taskesen, E., van, B. A., et al. (2017) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/110023 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Self-citationHill, W. D., Davies, G., Harris, S. E., Hagenaars, S. P., The neuroCHARGE Cognitive Working group, Davies, G., Deary, I. J., Debette, S., Verbaas, C. I., Bressler, J., et al. (2016) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/tp.2016.246 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Self-citationRichards, M., & Sacker, A. (2011) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyq166 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Hill, W. D., Davies, G., Harris, S. E., et al. (2016) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/063636 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Self-citationTrampush, J. W., Yang, M. L. Z., Yu, J., Knowles, E., Davies, G., Liewald, D. C., Starr, J. M., Djurovic, S., Melle, I., Sundet, K., et al. (2017) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/mp.2017.197
Self-citationCorrigendum to “Just one g: consistent results from three test batteries”
Johnson, W., Bouchard, T. J., Krueger, R. F., McGue, M., & Gottesman, I. I. (2004) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2004.03.001
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Jansen, I. E., Savage, J. E., Watanabe, K., Bryois, J., Williams, D. M., Steinberg, S., Sealock, J., Karlsson, I. K., Hägg, S., Athanasiu, L., et al. (2019) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-018-0311-9 · Cited by 2,277 · see citing works
Self-citation23andMe Research Team, Lee, J. J., COGENT (Cognitive Genomics Consortium), Social Science Genetic Association Consortium, Wedow, R., Okbay, A., Kong, E., Maghzian, O., Zacher, M., Nguyen-Viet, T. A., et al. (2018) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-018-0147-3 · Cited by 2,470 · see citing works
Self-citationThe role of prefrontal cortex in cognitive control and executive function
Friedman, N. P., & Robbins, T. W. (2022) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/s41386-021-01132-0 · Cited by 1,737 · see citing works
Comprehensive functional genomic resource and integrative model for the human brain
Wang, D., Liu, S., Warrell, J., Won, H., Shi, X., Navarro, F. C. P., Clarke, D., Gu, M., Emani, P., Yang, Y. T., et al. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aat8464 · Cited by 965 · see citing works
Self-citationInitiative, A. N. G., Watson, H. J., Eating Disorders Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium, Yilmaz, Z., Thornton, L. M., Hübel, C., Coleman, J. R. I., Gaspar, H. A., Bryois, J., Hinney, A., et al. (2019) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-019-0439-2 · Cited by 1,109 · see citing works
Self-citationSynGO: An Evidence-Based, Expert-Curated Knowledge Base for the Synapse
Koopmans, F., van Nierop, P., Andres-Alonso, M., Byrnes, A., Cijsouw, T., Coba, M. P., Cornelisse, L. N., Farrell, R. J., Goldschmidt, H. L., Howrigan, D. P., et al. (2019) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2019.05.002 · Cited by 938 · see citing works
Self-citationIntegrative functional genomic analysis of human brain development and neuropsychiatric risks
Li, M., Santpere, G., Imamura Kawasawa, Y., Evgrafov, O. V., Gulden, F. O., Pochareddy, S., Sunkin, S. M., Li, Z., Shin, Y., Zhu, Y., et al. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aat7615 · Cited by 810 · see citing works
Self-citationGenome-wide association studies of brain imaging phenotypes in UK Biobank
Elliott, L. T., Sharp, K., Alfaro-Almagro, F., Shi, S., Miller, K. L., Douaud, G., Marchini, J., & Smith, S. M. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0571-7 · Cited by 834 · see citing works
The genetic architecture of the human cerebral cortex
Grasby, K. L., Jahanshad, N., Painter, J. N., Colodro-Conde, L., Bralten, J., Hibar, D. P., Lind, P. A., Pizzagalli, F., Ching, C. R. K., McMahon, M. A. B., et al. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aay6690 · Cited by 876 · see citing works
Self-citationBrain cell type–specific enhancer–promoter interactome maps and disease <b>-</b> risk association
Nott, A., Holtman, I. R., Coufal, N. G., Schlachetzki, J. C. M., Yu, M., Hu, R., Han, C. Z., Pena, M., Xiao, J., Wu, Y., et al. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aay0793 · Cited by 823 · see citing works
The trans-ancestral genomic architecture of glycemic traits
Chen, J., Spracklen, C. N., Marenne, G., Varshney, A., Corbin, L. J., Luan, J., Willems, S. M., Wu, Y., Zhang, X., Horikoshi, M., et al. (2021) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-021-00852-9 · Cited by 798 · see citing works
Cognitive impairment in schizophrenia: aetiology, pathophysiology, and treatment
McCutcheon, R. A., Keefe, R. S. E., & McGuire, P. K. (2023) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-023-01949-9 · Cited by 800 · see citing works
Yarkoni, T. (2022) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x20001685 · Cited by 701 · see citing works
The new genetics of intelligence
Plomin, R. J., & von Stumm, S. (2018) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg.2017.104 · Cited by 495 · see citing works
Self-citationInterpreting type 1 diabetes risk with genetics and single-cell epigenomics
Chiou, J., Geusz, R. J., Okino, M.-L., Han, J. Y., Miller, M., Melton, R. L., Beebe, E., Benaglio, P., Huang, S., Korgaonkar, K., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03552-w · Cited by 437 · see citing works
Bryois, J., Skene, N., Hansen, T. F., Kogelman, L. J. A., Watson, H. J., Liu, Z., Adan, R. A. H., Alfredsson, L. S., Ando, T., Andreassen, O. A., et al. (2020) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-020-0610-9 · Cited by 374 · see citing works
Self-citationZhou, H., Sealock, J., Sanchez‐Roige, S., Clarke, T., Levey, D. F., Cheng, Z., Li, B., Polimanti, R. A., Kember, R. L., Vickers‐Smith, R., et al. (2020) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-020-0643-5 · Cited by 343 · see citing works
Sohail, M., Maier, R. M., Ganna, A., Bloemendal, A., Martin, A. R., Turchin, M. C., Chiang, C. W., Hirschhorn, J., Daly, M. J., Patterson, N., et al. (2019) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.39702 · Cited by 359 · see citing works
Genetic mapping of cell type specificity for complex traits
Watanabe, K., Mirkov, M. U., de Leeuw, C., van den Heuvel, M. P., & Posthuma, D. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-11181-1 · Cited by 323 · see citing works
Self-citationComparing Within- and Between-Family Polygenic Score Prediction
Selzam, S., Ritchie, S. J., Pingault, J.-B., Reynolds, C. A., O’Reilly, P. F., & Plomin, R. (2019) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2019.06.006 · Cited by 289 · see citing works
Self-citationZhang, M. J., Hou, K., Dey, K. K., Sakaue, S., Jagadeesh, K. A., Weinand, K., Taychameekiatchai, A., Rao, P., Pisco, A. O., Zou, J., et al. (2022) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-022-01167-z · Cited by 302 · see citing works
Zhao, B., Luo, T., Li, T., Li, Y., Zhang, J., Shan, Y., Wang, X., Yang, L., Zhou, F., Zhu, Z., et al. (2019) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-019-0516-6 · Cited by 295 · see citing works
Human gene and disease associations for clinical‐genomics and precision medicine research
Ahmed, Z., Zeeshan, S., Mendhe, D., & Dong, X. (2020) · Clinical and Translational Medicine · doi:10.1002/ctm2.28 · Cited by 316 · see citing works
Predicting Polygenic Risk of Psychiatric Disorders
Martin, A. R., Daly, M. J., Robinson, E., Hyman, S. E., & Neale, B. M. (2018) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2018.12.015 · Cited by 292 · see citing works
Item-level analyses reveal genetic heterogeneity in neuroticism
Nagel, M., Watanabe, K., Stringer, S., Posthuma, D., & van der Sluis, S. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-03242-8 · Cited by 263 · see citing works
Self-citationThe impact of short tandem repeat variation on gene expression
Feupe, S. F., Margoliash, J., Wang, C., Saini, S., Yanicky, R., Shleizer-Burko, S., Goren, A., & Gymrek, M. (2019) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-019-0521-9 · Cited by 271 · see citing works
Broad transcriptomic dysregulation occurs across the cerebral cortex in ASD
Gandal, M. J., Haney, J. R., Wamsley, B., Yap, C. X., Parhami, S., Emani, P. S., Chang, N., Chen, G. T., Hoftman, G. D., de Alba, D., et al. (2022) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05377-7 · Cited by 281 · see citing works
Discovery of shared genomic loci using the conditional false discovery rate approach
Smeland, O. B., Frei, O., Shadrin, A. A., O’Connell, K. S., Fan, C. C., Bahrami, S., Holland, D., Djurovic, S., Thompson, W. K., Dale, A. M., et al. (2019) · Human Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00439-019-02060-2 · Cited by 249 · see citing works
Self-citationGenetic control of RNA splicing and its distinct role in complex trait variation
Qi, T., Wu, Y., Fang, H., Zhang, F., Liu, S., Zeng, J., & Yang, J. (2022) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-022-01154-4 · Cited by 237 · see citing works
Andreassen, O. A., Hindley, G., Frei, O., & Smeland, O. B. (2023) · World Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/wps.21034 · Cited by 255 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Generalizability CrisisPreprint
Yarkoni, T. (2019) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/jqw35 · Cited by 275 · see citing works
Locus for severity implicates CNS resilience in progression of multiple sclerosis
International Multiple Sclerosis Genetics Consortium, Harroud, A., Stridh, P., McCauley, J. L., Saarela, J., van den Bosch, A. M. R., Engelenburg, H. J., Beecham, A. H., Alfredsson, L., Alikhani, K., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06250-x · Cited by 243 · see citing works
Holland, D., Frei, O., Desikan, R. S., Fan, C. C., Shadrin, A. A., Smeland, O. B., Sundar, V. S., Thompson, P. M., Andreassen, O. A., & Dale, A. M. (2020) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1008612 · Cited by 230 · see citing works
Self-citationWatanabe, K., Jansen, P. R., Savage, J. E., Nandakumar, P., Wang, X., Agee, M., Aslibekyan, S. W., Auton, A., Bell, R. K., Bryc, K., et al. (2022) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-022-01124-w · Cited by 234 · see citing works
Self-citationSmeland, O. B., Bahrami, S., Frei, O., Shadrin, A. A., O’Connell, K. S., Savage, J. E., Watanabe, K., Krull, F., Bettella, F., Steen, N. E., et al. (2019) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-018-0332-x · Cited by 223 · see citing works
Self-citationGenetic variants associated with longitudinal changes in brain structure across the lifespan
Brouwer, R. M., Klein, M., Grasby, K. L., Schnack, H. G., Jahanshad, N., Teeuw, J., Thomopoulos, S. I., Sprooten, E., Franz, C. E., Gogtay, N., et al. (2022) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-022-01042-4 · Cited by 227 · see citing works
Self-citationMulti-trait analysis for genome-wide association study of five psychiatric disorders
Wu, Y., Cao, H., Baranova, A. V., Huang, H., Li, S., Cai, L., Rao, S., Dai, M., Xie, M., Dou, Y., et al. (2020) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41398-020-00902-6 · Cited by 211 · see citing works
Oxytocin Signaling in the Central Amygdala Modulates Emotion Discrimination in Mice
Ferretti, V., Maltese, F., Contarini, G., Nigro, M., Bonavia, A., Huang, H., Gigliucci, V., Morelli, G., Scheggia, D., Managò, F., et al. (2019) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2019.04.070 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
Landslide recognition : identification, movement and courses
Dikau, R. (1996) · Wiley eBooks · Cited by 210 · see citing works
The polygenic architecture of schizophrenia — rethinking pathogenesis and nosology
Smeland, O. B., Frei, O., Dale, A. M., & Andreassen, O. A. (2020) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/s41582-020-0364-0 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
Self-citationColeman, J. R. I., Gaspar, H. A., Bryois, J., Byrne, E. M., Forstner, A. J., Holmans, P. A., de Leeuw, C. A., Mattheisen, M., McQuillin, A., Whitehead Pavlides, J. M., et al. (2020) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2019.10.015 · Cited by 199 · see citing works
Self-citationAyhan, F., Kulkarni, A., Berto, S., Sivaprakasam, K., Douglas, C., Lega, B. C., & Konopka, G. (2021) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2021.05.003 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
Polygenic inheritance, GWAS, polygenic risk scores, and the search for functional variants
Crouch, D. J. M., & Bodmer, W. F. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2005634117 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
Ancestry-inclusive dog genomics challenges popular breed stereotypes
Morrill, K. M., Hekman, J. P., Li, X., McClure, J., Logan, B., Goodman, L., Gao, M., Dong, Y., Alonso, M., Carmichael, E., et al. (2022) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abk0639 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
Kupari, J., Usoskin, D., Parisien, M., Lou, D., Hu, Y., Fatt, M. P., Lönnerberg, P., Spångberg, M., Eriksson, B., Barkas, N., et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-21725-z · Cited by 186 · see citing works
Genomic findings in schizophrenia and their implications
Owen, M. J., Legge, S. E., Rees, E., Walters, J., & O’Donovan, M. C. (2023) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-023-02293-8 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
An atlas of gene regulatory elements in adult mouse cerebrum
Li, Y. E., Preissl, S., Hou, X., Zhang, Z., Zhang, K., Qiu, Y., Poirion, O. B., Li, B., Chiou, J., Liu, H., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03604-1 · Cited by 185 · see citing works
Genetic mapping and evolutionary analysis of human-expanded cognitive networks
Wei, Y., de Lange, S. C., Scholtens, L. H., Watanabe, K., Ardesch, D. J., Jansen, P. R., Savage, J. E., Li, L., Preuss, T. M., Rilling, J. K., et al. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-12764-8 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Self-citationLeader development across the lifespan: A dynamic experiences-grounded approach
Liu, Z., Venkatesh, S., Murphy, S. E., & Riggio, R. E. (2020) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2020.101382 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Cao, Z., Wu, Y., Li, Q., Li, Y., & Wu, J. (2022) · Annals of Medicine · doi:10.1080/07853890.2022.2085883 · Cited by 183 · see citing works
Single-cell DNA methylation and 3D genome architecture in the human brain
Tian, W., Zhou, J., Bartlett, A., Zeng, Q., Liu, H., Castanon, R. G., Kenworthy, M., Altshul, J., Valadon, C., Aldridge, A., et al. (2023) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adf5357 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Self-citationResource profile and user guide of the Polygenic Index Repository
Becker, J., Burik, C. A. P., Goldman, G., Wang, N., Jayashankar, H., Bennett, M., Belsky, D. W., Linnér, R. K., Ahlskog, R., Kleinman, A., et al. (2021) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-021-01119-3 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
A comparative atlas of single-cell chromatin accessibility in the human brain
Li, Y. E., Preissl, S., Miller, M., Johnson, N. D., Wang, Z., Jiao, H., Zhu, C., Wang, Z., Xie, Y., Poirion, O., et al. (2023) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adf7044 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
Self-citationGenomic prediction of cognitive traits in childhood and adolescence
Allegrini, A. G., Selzam, S., Rimfeld, K., von Stumm, S., Pingault, J., & Plomin, R. J. (2019) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-019-0394-4 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
Self-citationJurgens, S. J., Choi, S. H., Morrill, V. N., Chaffin, M. D., Pirruccello, J. P., Halford, J. L., Weng, L.-C. C., Nauffal, V., Roselli, C., Hall, A. W., et al. (2022) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-021-01011-w · Cited by 158 · see citing works
Self-citationGenetic predictors of participation in optional components of UK Biobank
Tyrrell, J., Zheng, J., Beaumont, R., Hinton, K., Richardson, T. G., Wood, A. R., Davey Smith, G., Frayling, T. M., & Tilling, K. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-21073-y · Cited by 162 · see citing works
Fabbri, C., Hagenaars, S. P., John, C., Williams, A. T., Shrine, N. R. G., Moles, L., Hanscombe, K. B., Serretti, A., Shepherd, D. J., Free, R. C., et al. (2021) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-021-01062-9 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
A concerted neuron–astrocyte program declines in ageing and schizophrenia
Ling, E., Nemesh, J. C., Goldman, M., Kamitaki, N., Reed, N. M., Handsaker, R. E., Genovese, G., Vogelgsang, J. S., Gerges, S., Kashin, S., et al. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07109-5 · Cited by 162 · see citing works
Genetic variation, brain, and intelligence differences
Deary, I. J., Cox, S. R., & Hill, W. D. (2022) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-021-01027-y · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Self-citationGenetic correlates of phenotypic heterogeneity in autism
Warrier, V., Zhang, X., Reed, P., Havdahl, A., Moore, T. M., Cliquet, F., Leblond, C. S., Rolland, T., Rosengren, A., LEAP, E.-A., et al. (2022) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-022-01072-5 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Association of mental disorder in childhood and adolescence with subsequent educational achievement
Dalsgaard, S., McGrath, J., Østergaard, S. D., Wray, N. R., Pedersen, C. B., Mortensen, P. B., & Petersen, L. (2020) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.0217 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
Mace, E., Innes, D., Hunt, C., et al. (2018) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00122-018-3212-5 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Sociology, Genetics, and the Coming of Age of Sociogenomics
Mills, M. C., & Tropf, F. C. (2020) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-121919-054756 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Common variants contribute to intrinsic human brain functional networks
Zhao, B., Li, T., Smith, S. M., Xiong, D., Wang, X., Yang, Y., Luo, T., Zhu, Z., Shan, Y., Matoba, N., et al. (2022) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-022-01039-6 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Self-citationAssociation of Genetic Liability to Psychotic Experiences With Neuropsychotic Disorders and Traits
Legge, S. E., Jones, H. J., Kendall, K. M., Pardiñas, A. F., Menzies, G. E., Bracher‐Smith, M., Escott‐Price, V., Rees, E., Davis, K. A. S., Hotopf, M. H., et al. (2019) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.2508 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Self-citationCell-type-specific 3D epigenomes in the developing human cortex
Song, M., Pebworth, M.-P., Yang, X., Abnousi, A., Fan, C., Wen, J., Rosen, J. D., Choudhary, M. N. K., Cui, X., Jones, I. R., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2825-4 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
The genetic architecture of structural left–right asymmetry of the human brain
Sha, Z., Schijven, D., Carrión-Castillo, A., Joliot, M., Mazoyer, B. M., Fisher, S. E., Crivello, F., & Francks, C. (2021) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-021-01069-w · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Causal influences of neuroticism on mental health and cardiovascular disease
Zhang, F., Baranova, A. V., Zhou, C., Cao, H., Chen, J., Zhang, X., & Xu, M. (2021) · Human Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00439-021-02288-x · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Sex-Dependent Shared and Non-Shared Genetic Architecture Across Mood and Psychotic Disorders
Blokland, G. A. M., Grove, J., Chen, C., Cotsapas, C. J., Tobet, S. A., Handa, R. J., Ripke, S., Neale, B. M., Corvin, A., Walters, J., et al. (2020) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2021.02.972 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Self-citationSeeboth, A., & Mõttus, R. (2018) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1002/per.2147 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Liang, K. J., & Carlson, E. S. (2019) · Neurobiology of Learning and Memory · doi:10.1016/j.nlm.2019.01.004 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Genes, Cells and Brain Areas of Intelligence
Goriounova, N. A., & Mansvelder, H. D. (2019) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2019.00044 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Genetic heterogeneity and subtypes of major depression
Nguyen, T.-D., Harder, A., Xiong, Y., Kowalec, K., Hägg, S., Cai, N., Kuja-Halkola, R., Dalman, C., Sullivan, P. F., & Lu, Y. (2022) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-021-01413-6 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Self-citationThe genetic architecture of human cortical folding
van der Meer, D., Kaufmann, T., Shadrin, A. A., Makowski, C., Frei, O., Roelfs, D., Sánchez, J. M., Linden, D. E. J., Rokicki, J., de Leeuw, C., et al. (2021) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abj9446 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Self-citationAllele-specific open chromatin in human iPSC neurons elucidates functional disease variants
Zhang, S., Zhang, H., Zhou, Y., Qiao, M., Zhao, S., Kozlova, A., Shi, J., Sanders, A. R., Wang, G., Luo, K., et al. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aay3983 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Self-citationMaul, S., Giegling, I., Fabbri, C., Corponi, F., Serretti, A., & Rujescu, D. (2020) · American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics · doi:10.1002/ajmg.b.32763 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Self-citationUnderstanding others: Emotion recognition in humans and other animals
Ferretti, V., & Papaleo, F. (2018) · Genes Brain & Behavior · doi:10.1111/gbb.12544 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Gialluisi, A., Andlauer, T. F. M., Mirza‐Schreiber, N., Moll, K., Becker, J., Hoffmann, P., Ludwig, K. U., Czamara, D., Pourcain, B. S., Honbolygó, F., et al. (2020) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-020-00898-x · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Polygenic scores: prediction versus explanation
Plomin, R. J., & von Stumm, S. (2021) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-021-01348-y · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Self-citationHindley, G., Frei, O., Shadrin, A. A., Cheng, W., O’Connell, K. S., Icick, R., Parker, N., Bahrami, S., Karadag, N., Roelfs, D., et al. (2022) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.21101051 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Self-citationLam, M., Hill, W. D., Trampush, J. W., Yu, J., Knowles, E., Davies, G., Stahl, E. A., Huckins, L. M., Liewald, D. C. M., Djurovic, S., et al. (2019) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2019.06.012 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Self-citationAn overview on neurobiology and therapeutics of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder
da Silva, B. S., Grevet, E. H., Silva, L. C. F., Ramos, J. K. N., Rovaris, D. L., & Bau, C. H. D. (2023) · Discover Mental Health · doi:10.1007/s44192-022-00030-1 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Mallard, T. T., Savage, J. E., Johnson, E. C., Huang, Y., Edwards, A. C., Hottenga, J., Grotzinger, A. D., Gustavson, D. E., Jennings, M. V., Anokhin, A. P., et al. (2021) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2020.20091390 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Self-citationCell type-specific epigenetic links to schizophrenia risk in the brain
Mendizabal, I., Berto, S., Usui, N., Toriumi, K., Chatterjee, P., Douglas, C., Huh, I., Jeong, H., Layman, T. S., Tamminga, C. A., et al. (2019) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-019-1747-7 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Peyrot, W. J., & Price, A. L. (2021) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-021-00787-1 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Shared genetic background between children and adults with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder
Rovira, P., Demontis, D., Sánchez-Mora, C., Zayats, T., Klein, M., Mota, N. R., Weber, H., Garcia-Martínez, I., Pagerols, M., Vilar-Ribó, L., et al. (2020) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/s41386-020-0664-5 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Self-citationScreening Human Embryos for Polygenic Traits Has Limited Utility
Karavani, E., Zuk, O., Zeevi, D., Barzilai, N., Stefanis, N. C., Hatzimanolis, A., Smyrnis, N., Avramopoulos, D., Kruglyak, L., Atzmon, G., et al. (2019) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2019.10.033 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Self-citationIntelligence, health and death
Deary, I. J., Hill, W. D., & Galé, C. R. (2021) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-021-01078-9 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Relationship Between Polygenic Risk Scores and Cognition in Schizophrenia
Richards, A. L., Pardiñas, A. F., Frizzati, A., Tansey, K. E., Lynham, A. J., Holmans, P., Legge, S. E., Savage, J. E., Agartz, I., Andreassen, O. A., et al. (2019) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbz061 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Self-citationGenome-wide meta-analysis of brain volume identifies genomic loci and genes shared with intelligence
Jansen, P. R., Nagel, M., Watanabe, K., Wei, Y., Savage, J. E., de Leeuw, C., van den Heuvel, M. P., van der Sluis, S., & Posthuma, D. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-19378-5 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Self-citationA general dimension of genetic sharing across diverse cognitive traits inferred from molecular data
de la Fuente, J., Davies, G., Grotzinger, A. D., Tucker–Drob, E. M., & Deary, I. J. (2020) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-020-00936-2 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Self-citationPerneczky, R., Kempermann, G., Korczyn, A. D., Matthews, F. E., Ikram, M. A., Scarmeas, N., Chételat, G., Stern, Y., & Ewers, M. (2019) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-019-1283-z · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Self-citationShared heritability of human face and brain shape
Naqvi, S., Sleyp, Y., Hoskens, H., Indencleef, K., Spence, J. P., Bruffaerts, R., Radwan, A., Eller, R. J., Richmond, S., Shriver, M. D., et al. (2021) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-021-00827-w · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Five-factor model personality traits and cognitive function in five domains in older adulthood
Sutin, A. R., Stéphan, Y., Luchetti, M., & Terracciano, A. (2019) · BMC Geriatrics · doi:10.1186/s12877-019-1362-1 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Matoba, N., Liang, D., Sun, H., Aygün, N., McAfee, J. C., Davis, J. E., Raffield, L. M., Qian, H., Piven, J., Li, Y., et al. (2020) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41398-020-00953-9 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
(2022) · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2022.06.034 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Self-citationWang, M., Song, W., Chen, M., Wang, Q., Zhou, X., Xu, P., Krek, A., Yoon, Y., Ho, L., Orr, M. E., et al. (2022) · Molecular Neurodegeneration · doi:10.1186/s13024-022-00517-z · Cited by 100 · see citing works
A shared neural basis underlying psychiatric comorbidity
Xie, C., Xiang, S., Shen, C., Peng, X.-R., Kang, J., Li, Y., Cheng, W., He, S., Bobou, M., Broulidakis, J., et al. (2023) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-023-02317-4 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Self-citationYu, K., Chen, X., Guo, J., Wang, S., Huang, X., Guo, Y., Dong, S., & Yang, T. (2023) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-023-02982-9 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Liang, D., Elwell, A. L., Aygün, N., Krupa, O., Wolter, J. M., Kyere, F. A., Lafferty, M. J., Cheek, K. E., Courtney, K. P., Yusupova, M., et al. (2021) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-021-00858-w · Cited by 83 · see citing works
- Authors
- Savage, J. E., Jansen, P. R., Stringer, S., Watanabe, K., Bryois, J., de Leeuw, C. A., Nagel, M., Awasthi, S., Barr, P. B., Coleman, J. R. I., Grasby, K. L., Hammerschlag, A. R., Kaminski, J. A., Karlsson, R., Krapohl, E., Lam, M., Nygaard, M., Reynolds, C. A., Trampush, J. W., Young, H., Zabaneh, D., Hägg, S., Hansell, N. K., Karlsson, I. K., Linnarsson, S., Montgomery, G. W., Muñoz-Manchado, A. B., Quinlan, E. B., Schumann, G., Skene, N. G., Webb, B. T., White, T., Arking, D. E., Avramopoulos, D., Bilder, R. M., Bitsios, P., Burdick, K. E., Cannon, T. D., Chiba-Falek, O., Christoforou, A., Cirulli, E. T., Congdon, E., Corvin, A., Davies, G., Deary, I. J., DeRosse, P., Dickinson, D., Djurovic, S., Donohoe, G., Conley, E. D., Eriksson, J. G., Espeseth, T., Freimer, N. A., Giakoumaki, S., Giegling, I., Gill, M., Glahn, D. C., Hariri, A. R., Hatzimanolis, A., Keller, M. C., Knowles, E., Koltai, D., Konte, B., Lahti, J., Le Hellard, S., Lencz, T., Liewald, D. C., London, E., Lundervold, A. J., Malhotra, A. K., Melle, I., Morris, D., Need, A. C., Ollier, W., Palotie, A., Payton, A., Pendleton, N., Poldrack, R. A., Räikkönen, K., Reinvang, I., Roussos, P., Rujescu, D., Sabb, F. W., Scult, M. A., Smeland, O. B., Smyrnis, N., Starr, J. M., Steen, V. M., Stefanis, N. C., Straub, R. E., Sundet, K., Tiemeier, H., Voineskos, A. N., Weinberger, D. R., Widen, E., Yu, J., Abecasis, G., Andreassen, O. A., Breen, G., Christiansen, L., Debrabant, B., Dick, D. M., Heinz, A., Hjerling-Leffler, J., Ikram, M. A., Kendler, K. S., Martin, N. G., Medland, S. E., Pedersen, N. L., Plomin, R., Polderman, T. J. C., Ripke, S., van der Sluis, S., Sullivan, P. F., Vrieze, S. I., Wright, M. J., & Posthuma, D.
- Affiliations
- Amsterdam Neuroscience (NL)
- Erasmus MC (NL)
- Karolinska Institutet (SE)
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
- Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
- King's College London (GB)
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute (AU)
- Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
- Institute of Mental Health (SG)
- University of Southern Denmark (DK)
- University of California, Riverside (US)
- University of Southern California (US)
- University of Minnesota (US)
- The University of Queensland (AU)
- ORCID
- Savage, Jeanne E.
- Jansen, Philip R.
- Stringer, Sven
- Watanabe, Kyoko
- Bryois, Julien
- Nagel, Mats
- Awasthi, Swapnil
- Barr, Peter B.
- Coleman, Jonathan R. I.
- Grasby, Katrina L.
- Hammerschlag, Anke R.
- Kaminski, Jakob A.
- Karlsson, Robert
- Krapohl, Eva
- Lam, Max
- Nygaard, Marianne
- Reynolds, Chandra A.
- Trampush, Joey W.
- Young, Hannah
- Zabaneh, Delilah
- Hägg, Sara
- Hansell, Narelle K.
- Karlsson, Ida K.
- Linnarsson, Sten
- Webb, Bradley T.
- Chiba-Falek, Ornit
- Freimer, Nelson A.
- Gill, Michael
- Konte, Bettina
- Lahti, Jari
- Liewald, David C.
- Lundervold, Astri J.
- Need, Anna C.
- Pendleton, Neil
- Roussos, Panos
- Smeland, Olav B.
- Tiemeier, Henning
- Andreassen, Ole A.
- Breen, Gerome
- Hjerling-Leffler, Jens
- Ikram, M. Arfan
- Medland, Sarah E.
- Polderman, Tinca J. C.
- Sullivan, Patrick F.
- Wright, Margaret J.
- Posthuma, Danielle
- Venue
- Nature Genetics
- Published
- 2018-06-25
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 912-919
- ISSN
- 1061-4036 (ISSN-L)
- 1546-1718
- PMC
- PMC6411041
- OpenAlex
- W2809193491
- Cited by
- 1,443
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 92 · 2025: 165 · 2024: 188 · 2023: 170 · 2022: 171 · 2021: 187 · 2020: 157 · 2019: 121 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 97.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature Genetics (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
- VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- e-space (Manchester Metropolitan University) (acceptedVersion)
- Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (submittedVersion)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion)
- Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
- University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- SUNY Digital Repository Support (State University of New York System) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
- Keywords
- intelligence, cognitive ability, genetic loci, expression quantitative trait loci, chromatin interactions, non-synonymous mutations, brain gene expression, striatal medium spiny neurons
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Brain, Female, Humans, Intelligence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-29.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-29.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review